Comment Re:America is finished! OVER! (Score 1) 285
What you're not explaining is that the people who are making all the money are able to dodge the taxes.
What you're not explaining is that the people who are making all the money are able to dodge the taxes.
I'm ok with them watching porn, as long as they don't have to see that rampart violence that litters TV.
Let's teach our kids that if someone fucks with them, it's ok to fuck them back.
if everything is automated, there is no more poor or middle class
besides, a poor country like the philippines: everyone has a maid and a driver. even the maids have maids and drivers
having people work for you is not proof of being rich. it's a proof of overpopulation
It is not a necessity. Not any more than a computer, an internet connection or a dishwasher. It's a matter of convenience and enjoyment. People want to watch their shows. And to watch them, they need to be able to do just that. They don't care that they get channels they don't want to get. What difference does it make for them?
There are a number of native libraries devoted to quickly defining and presenting working forms in iOS.
For charts, there are a number of really excellent solutions that cost money, but not much and they deliver really nice, dynamic graphs with many options.
If I were doing a heavy enterprise form app I'd still go native.
Most of the shopping channels get on your cable system though having a local TV transmitter. Cable companies are "required to carry" any and all local over the air stations. It was the "deal" that was made to allow cable systems to exist, many decades ago. So you are going to get those no matter what.
[Citation needed]
I mean, that's true in theory, but in practice, since the [OTA] digital switchover, the cable company where I live has been getting away with downgrading stuff that would be 1080i with an antenna to 480p (unless you pay an extra bribe for them to leave it HD), and omitting broadcast subchannels entirely.
Hmm... couldn't we simply do away with them instead of me? I mean, it does accomplish the same purpose.
Except most app developers want to target as many users across as many devices as possible
Say, isn't that what Malware and Spyware authors want too?
It makes very little financial sense to spend months on a native app that runs on handful of devices
"Handful" = > 500 million... that's just for iOS. Android has more.
I'd say 500 million potential customers warrants SOME degree of effort.
Also if it's so easy for me to build out something mediocre in PhoneGap that works for everyone, doesn't that mean the inevitable Chinese clone comes out on my tail all the faster?
The problem is that the only real option you have is abstaining. You don't want this behaviour? No cable TV for you. Because there's no such thing as a "channel mix" that you want. Have you ever taken a look at the average "basic mix" of channels? Nobody, absolutely nobody, on this planet would choose these channels. No matter what his interests.
If you're not happy with this, your choice is to do without. Not only without the channels you don't want, but also the ones that you would want. Don't want Sports and Bible TV? Ok, no SciFi for you either.
And most people would rather grin and bear it than abstain. Essentially what it means to them is that they don't get the 100+ channels promised but actually just about 10, with 90+ more that could as well not exist.
Cable? It's the only reason for having a TV anymore.
Why make your kids cry? www.thepiratebay...
If I could have gotten a cable package without sports channels (which would have been much cheaper than anything actually offered), I might actually still have it. As it is, the cable company lost me as a customer in part because of their dumbass deal with ESPN.
Isn't that what I said?
Even if the boat is full of water, as long as it's still floating when you plug the leak you've solved the problem. (Or at least, the most important problem.)
it would generate more energy that it used...Clearly that would cause the car to never be able to stop, and always continue increasing in velocity.
That is not a problem; you reverse the polarity to the regenerative braking system, and feed the excess power into that to stop. I call it the "degenerative braking system"
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.