You opened the PDF but you clearly didn't read a single word of it.

Stop looking at the pictures. Its not a porn magazine.

When I open my hood, there is nothing there to assure me its "working", other than a rotating fan, some noise, some heat and a big chunk of metal.
How could I know its working? It could be all batteries and speakers and butane lighters inside that chunk of metal.

Does the car move, well, lets see....

Step 1 Open door, get in car.
Step 2 insert key
(You can see where this is going)....

Nobody I know disassembles a motor in their new truck to make sure the goddamed thing runs.
Even for new an novel things like a Tesla, nobody I know insists the dealer take it appart and show them every winding and bolt.

Ultimately it comes down to "Do you really Care"? If your are a motor head, you probably do, but mostly as a point of interest.
But on the other hand, if you view it just as transportation, and it came with some kind of warranty and performed acceptably on the test drive, then for transportation purposes who cares if its 40'000 well trained mice under the hood who eat gasoline and poop only tail pipe emissions, or electric motors or an internal combustion engine, or batteries and fans and speakers making throaty sounding roars.

Manufacturer said it would do THIS, and when I tried THIS it worked, or it didn't. And it worked for all the other people who bought it for many years, and none of them came around with stories about their mice escaping en mass and killing their cat.

I don't open my cell phones either. Not on purpose anyway.

But you know THAT it works. It got you from A to B in time T.

You'd be amazed, (or probably you wouldn't) to know just how many people haven't a clue about what's under the hood or how it works.
Met this girl once who seriously thought that electricity originated at the breaker panel. She was 19 at the time.

It certainly gives you insight into THAT it works.
Which seems to be all the "inventor" is willing to disclose.

Note: I have no opinion about how it works, or even if it works. All I'm pointing out is that these investigators seem to have reasonable credentials, and they are still hedging their statement, but standing behind their measurements.

So does CsipSimple.
Every Sip app I've tried has this.

Rigged demo! Not allowed to measure!

So you didn't read the PDF either, did you.!?
Go do your homework, and post back when you have done so.

Right, they were not allowed to do destructive testing and break the ceramic casing on the wires.

It was about as big around as a 50 cent piece, and maybe 2 feet long.
So lets say the device (which the heated up till it was glowing) hid a batter that could generate the
excess 1.5 megawatt-hours. Wouldn't such a battery ALL BY ITSELF be a significant invention?

You haven't shown any other possible source for the independent measurement of 1.5 megawatt-hours, of energy.
The guys who measured it, have better credentials than you.

Do your own research son, your desire to remain willfully ignorant suggests there is simply no point in talking to you.

Sa this posted over on SoylentNews:
Seems some are getting a little pissed at getting blamed, without any proper training
http://blink.htcsense.com/Web/...

There were three of the devices, and they were set up by the researchers, not the device owner.
You now are claiming, without doing a shred of research that these people are all frauds?
What would their motive be to destroy their careers?

They had it in their hands and they had their instruments connected to it the entire time.

Did you read the PDF?
Of course not.

Their names are in the PDF. Their resume is in Google.

Did you read even a few pages of the PDF?
Cuz I feel like you didn't.

The PDF documents exactly the devices used to monitor input power

.

Explain that part about explaining inputs and outputs being "meaningless".

The size of the element alone precludes it having stored 1.5 megawatt-hours by chemical or other known means.
Further, they did analysis on the metal isotopes (maybe you missed that part). Start reading the PDF on page 27.

Since the machine needs to be charged with fuel for each run and the fuel changes isotopic composition by the end of the run, your objections as to "perpetual machines" are moot and misplaced.

Nobody made any such claims.

Their measurements indicate more power is output than was input.
These experts haven't figured it out. They are not exactly idiots. Google them.

Are you being willfully blind?

Muslim leaders have had to be badgered by WHO into revising their teachings in the face of Ebola.
http://www.esinislam.com/Other...
http://ahmadiyyatimes.blogspot...