Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 


Forgot your password?
Close
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Information Sources? (Score 1) 180

by halo1982 (#38481816) Attached to: Crowdsourced List of SOPA Supporters

I'd like to see a column containing the source of data indicating that the entity supports SOPA. SOPA support is quickly becoming the 'PR Mark of Death' so there needs to be some semblance of certainty that each entity should really be on that list.

Then create a column and hunt down the information yourself for the benefit of others! See crowdsourced! <snark />

But yeah, on a non-snarky note I agree with you and this information should be included.

Comment Re:LVMH (Score 1) 180

by halo1982 (#38481742) Attached to: Crowdsourced List of SOPA Supporters

no $1000 handbag for my wife now.

All of the major fashion houses are for SOPA due to knock-offs diluting their brands. See Dolce & Gabbana and others on this list.

Of course you can't dilute the Louis Vuitton brand any more than they have with their tacky monogram logo plastered all over everything, but that's an argument for another time.

Comment Re:Two-handed phone? (Score 1) 246

by halo1982 (#37658072) Attached to: Nexus Prime, And Ice Cream Sandwich, Go For a Video Tour

Even with 4.3" about three quarters of the population won't be able to reach all points across the screen with their thumb when using the phone one-handed without balancing it on three fingers. And not many people will like a phone that NEEDS both hands to use it.

I have issues with anything 4" or above and I don't think I have hands that are that small. On my Galaxy S with a 4" screen I could barely use it with one hand, and on an HTC HD7 that was totally impossible with it's 4.3" screen. 4.65" is just ridiculous and starts to get into Dell Streak 5 territory. But on my iPhone I have no issues with one-handed use and I find it's 3.5" screen perfect. And I'm finding less and less of a reason to Jail Break it with each itteration of iOS.
Networking

Free IPv4 Pool Now Down To Seven /8s 460

Posted by timothy from the need-to-join-a-new-pool dept.
Zocalo writes "For those of you keeping score, ICANN just allocated another four /8 IPv4 blocks; 23/8 and 100/8 to ARIN, 5/8 and 37/8 to RIPE, leaving just seven /8s unassigned. In effect however, this means that there are now just two /8s available before the entire pool will be assigned due to an arrangement whereby the five Regional Internet Registries would each automatically receive one of the final five /8s once that threshold was met. The IPv4 Address Report counter at Potaroo.net is pending an update and still saying 96 days, but it's now starting to look doubtful that we're going to even make it to January."
Input Devices

USB Is the Devil's Connection 474

Posted by CmdrTaco from the god-bless-the-loons dept.
Jamie handed us Satan's Data Connection. You see, sane and rational human being, the USB logo is actually in the shape of a trident, and the obvious action to Evangelical Christians in Brazil is to ban its use. Hopefully they don't mispronounce SCSI and find themselves lusting after their PCs.

Comment Re:Remember kids... (Score 1) 262

by halo1982 (#32796912) Attached to: BBC Web Slip-Up Insults Facebook Fans

The problem with Lorem Ipsum is the stupid questions from clients.

" Is it French? What the fuck is this? Don't you speak english? How is anyone supposed to read it?"

MOD PARENT WAY THE FUCK UP!!!!

Yeah, I get this all the time.

Even once from my old boss when I was working at a newspaper...*sigh*
Space

Weird Exoplanet Orbits Could Screw Up Alien Life 161

Posted by CmdrTaco from the stupid-newton dept.
astroengine writes "Life is good in the Solar System. We have Jupiter to thank for that. However, if the gas giant's orbit were a little more elliptical, there's every chance that Earth would become rather uncomfortable very quickly. Researchers looking at the zoo of exoplanets orbiting distant stars have simulated several scenarios of differing exoplanet orbits and find that many don't resemble our cozy Solar System. In fact, weird exoplanet orbits may be the deciding factor as to whether extraterrestrial life can form or not."
Image

Wells Fargo Bank Sues Itself 445

Posted by samzenpus from the so-crazy-it-just-might-work dept.
Extreme economic problems require extreme solutions, and Wells Fargo Bank has come up with a good one. They have decided to sue themselves. Wells Fargo holds the first and second mortgages on a condominium that is going into foreclosure. As holder of the first, they are suing all other lien holders, including the holder of the second, which is Wells Fargo. It gets better. The company has hired a lawyer to defend itself against its own lawsuit. The defense lawyer even filed this answer to the complaint, "Defendant admits that it is the owner and holder of a mortgage encumbering the subject real property. All other allegations of the complaint are denied." On the website The Consumer Warning Network, Angie Moreschi wrote: "We've apparently reached the perfect storm for complete and utter idiocy by some banks trying to foreclose on homes."
Security

Submission + - Sony in new root kit investigation (bbc.co.uk)

Submitted by szlwzl
szlwzl writes: Looks like sony's rootkit is still causing problems, some of their fingerprint scanning usb drives are installing the same rootkit as featured on their cds last year.
Microsoft

If This Was a Month Ago, OOXML Would Be Over 230

Posted by ScuttleMonkey from the games-of-corporate-chess dept.
Andy Updegrove writes "Public announcements of how Participating members of ISO have voted on OOXML are now rolling in one at a time, and the trend thus far is meaningfully weighted towards 'No with comments.' By my count, there are now four announced Yes votes, with comments, two abstentions, and seven public No with comments votes for OOXML in ISO/IEC JT1. Korea has reportedly voted no as well, and I expect at least Canada, Japan and the United Kingdom to announce 'No with comments' today or tomorrow. There will be more no votes on the roster when the final results are announced in a day or two. But even if the 11 votes I know of now were the only votes, the vote would now have failed — but for the 11 countries that upgraded their status from Observer to Participating member status in the last few weeks. Without those extra 11 'P' countries, it would only require 10 votes to block OOXML from immediate approval. If most or all of those additional 'P' members vote 'yes' as expected, it will confirm suspicions that Microsoft has promoted extra votes in favor of OOXML not only within National Bodies, but within ISO itself."
United States

Submission + - Court ends ban on navy sonar tests (reuters.com)

Submitted by
mikesd81
mikesd81 writes: "Over at Reuters there's an article that states the U.S. appeals court has put on hold a lower court injunction blocking the U.S. Navy from using a type of sonar that wildlife supporters say harms whales in exercises off the California coast. The Natural Resources Defense Council won a federal court's preliminary injunction against Navy tests using mid-frequency active sonar to detect underwater objects like submarines. However, a split three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the lower court had considered only the fate of the whales while ignoring American defense needs. Judge Andrew Kleinfeld wrote, "The district court did not explain why a broad, absolute injunction against the use of the medium frequency active sonar in these complex training exercises for two years was necessary to avoid irreparable harm to the environment.""
The Internet

Submission + - Google grows into a target (internet.co.ba)

Submitted by
webalizator
webalizator writes: "Google's historic IPO took place three years ago, and the Mountain View, Calif., search giant has an anniversary present for its founders: Not only did Larry Page and Sergey Brin beat Bill Gates in developing a better search engine, the young technologists also can boast of bringing shareholders a bigger reward. Since Google went public Aug. 19, 2004, at $85 a share, its market value has grown nearly 500 percent to $156 billion. In comparison, Microsoft's value had not quite quadrupled on its third anniversary way back in March 1989. But Google's precocious performance has come at a price: Antitrust regulators in the United States are probing its proposed $3.1 billion purchase of DoubleClick, an Internet advertising company, and European regulators are poised to follow suit. Meanwhile, open-source activists are developing alternatives to Google's popular search engine. It's a position that Google's top rival, Microsoft, knows all too well. Less than a decade ago, the same combination of colorless bureaucrats and colorful coders helped end the software giant's spectacular growth spurt, sending its stock into a seven-year slump. Industry experts say there are cautionary lessons to be drawn in comparing the two companies. "There's clearly a strong parallel on the antitrust front. You can draw a line from IBM through Microsoft to Google," said Tom Eisenmann, a Harvard Business School professor who has written a case study on Google. But Eisenmann noted that Google's market share in Internet search — about 50 percent in the United States — is significantly less than the 70 percent share of the computer mainframe market IBM enjoyed before regulators cracked down, or Microsoft's share of the personal-computer software market, which was more than 90 percent. "I don't think that is going to be the comeuppance of Google," Eisenmann said of current antitrust review. Others say trouble appears to be brewing. "Just as concerns about Microsoft gradually increased until they reached critical mass, I think that is starting to happen with Google," said Lauren Weinstein, co-founder of People for Internet Responsibility. "We are starting to approach a tipping point in all this, where the risks to Google are becoming greater and greater." Microsoft antitrust Microsoft faced its first antitrust probe four years after it went public. That investigation ended in July 1994 after the software giant agreed it would not use its dominance in computer-operating systems to undercut competitors. However, Microsoft's antitrust problems continued. An order from a federal judge to break up the company was replaced by a settlement in 2002. A European Commission ruling against the Redmond company is on appeal and is expected to be decided this month. In Google's case, opponents in the United States and Europe are already citing Microsoft's dominance of office applications to bolster their arguments. They contend Google's acquisition of DoubleClick could help it dominate the rapidly growing market for Internet advertising, combining Google's leadership in search-related ads with DoubleClick's strength in display ads. They also warn that the vast amount of data about people's behavior on the Internet held by the combined company could threaten privacy. Google said it is "confident that this acquisition poses no risk to competition and respects consumer privacy." But Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, one of several consumer groups that asked the Federal Trade Commission to review the acquisition, said it would eliminate meaningful competition, and not only because the new entity would control so much of the market. Chester said also that publishers might fear that if they did not deal with Google, their ranking in Google's search engine might be affected, making their content harder to find. "There's more at stake here than just control of online advertising and privacy," Chester said. "I believe the future of online content will be determined by the shape of the market" for Internet advertising. Open-source effort Similar concerns are driving the effort to develop an open-source search engine. "Search should be transparent, open and participatory," said Jimmy Wales, founder of Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia written by volunteers, who is organizing the effort. When Wales talks about Wikia Search, he consciously echoes the same concerns voiced by the developers who took on Microsoft in the 1990s as a way of rebelling against the control Microsoft was exerting over applications for personal computers. Wales says Internet search is plagued by the same problems that bedeviled proprietary software: lack of accountability, transparency and freedom. Top-secret formula Google closely guards its top-secret formula for ranking Web sites, making it impossible for a publisher to know why a site might enjoy front-page ranking one day in the search results and drop to Page 100 the next. Just as open-source developers openly published the software code behind alternatives to the Windows operating system and Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Wales' programmers will publicly disclose their algorithms for ranking results in the Wikia Search project. Still, open-source software could be far less of a challenge for Google than it was for Microsoft. Google already makes liberal use of open-source software, including Linux, GNU tools, OpenSSL, MySQL and computer languages like Python and C. Hundreds of Googlers have worked on improving Linux. And Google has published more than a million lines of code under open-source licenses, according to a company representative. "Open source benefits Google in many ways and it creates commercial challenges for Google in many ways," said Paul Saffo, a respected technology forecaster. One test could come from Openads, a London company whose free ad-server software competes with DoubleClick. Openads is headed by James Bilefield, a veteran of Skype and Yahoo, and backed by Index Ventures and Mangrove Capital Partners, which also backed Skype, as well as First Round Capital and O'Reilly AlphaTech Ventures. Unlike DoubleClick, Openads does not collect consumer information from the publishers who use its software. While its 20,000 customers are primarily small publishers, larger players who are concerned that DoubleClick could end up sharing information with Google are looking at Openads as an alternative. Rather than hurt Google, however, Openads' very existence could help Google persuade regulators to approve the DoubleClick merger. Validation of defense Microsoft's defense to regulators — that competition would inevitably emerge — has been validated, in part, by the success of open source. "There was really a lot of justice to the complaints against Microsoft," said tech publisher Tim O'Reilly. "They did have a monopoly position and they appeared to abuse it, but they were also right in saying that the market would correct, their monopoly wouldn't be forever." Despite widespread admiration of Google's success, O'Reilly said, there is growing animosity against the company, especially in Silicon Valley, where Google's growth has made it increasingly hard for other companies to compete for talented employees. "They are powerful, they are arrogant, but I don't think they are winner-take-all competitors in the way Microsoft was," he said. "People got burned so bad by Microsoft they are kind of overreacting.""

Slashdot Top Deals

BLISS is ignorance.

Close