Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Very disappointing. (Score 1) 93

The fact that you see nothing wrong with Apples requirements says loads - so its ok to set prices across your ecosystem and everyone else ecosystems (which is what Apple was doing) but setting prices on just your own ecosystem is completely wrong...?

The fact that a publisher setting their own price on your market with the only requirement of that market being that it is equal to or lower than any other market you sell in seems perfectly fine. Apple is not setting a price, the publisher is free to set any price they want anywhere they want to sell. Amazon, however, is setting the price, regardless of what price you want to sell your product for.

Comment Re:Very disappointing. (Score 1) 93

In this case, I agree with the publishers, and Apple, and disagree with Amazon. Amazon had been brute forcing publishers to accept Amazon's set prices, not allowing publishers to set their own prices. Apple wanted to allow publishers to set their own prices. Think Walmart here, the same thing applies. Philosophically, Apple and the publishers are in the right. Amazon is abusing an effective monopoly position by saying "sell at our prices or hit the road". Apple said "sell at any price you want, as long as that price is equal to or less than the lowest price you sell elsewhere".

Comment Re:Typical (Score 1) 162

That would be true. However, the computer itself and the means of producing it can be patented, but only for new designs and new production means. Wiring components together on stripboards would not count, for example, but building a new type of lithography machine might. A working quantum computer most likely would, as well as usher in a whole slew of new and patentable ideas, since it should work very differently from current computer designs.

Comment Re:No, no unfair advantage at all... (Score 1) 175

From TFA

Rehm runs and jumps with a specially designed blade that is 15 inches longer than his other leg

I can't imagine why anyone would accuses him of 'cheating' ...

The device is like a spring, so it stores energy as well as having extra length and mechanical advantage, and better still its far stronger and requires much more force to break.

I'm sorry he lost his leg, but there is no why this is 'fair' by any sense of the word.

It would be like wearing $500 shoes in a marathon when other runners are barefoot. Or like using a wind tunnel to train your bobsled team!

Not quite, all the other runners can wear $500 shoes too. The wind tunnel is used to design better bobsleds, not train in. Unless all competitors can utilize similar "appendages", yes, it's not fair.

Comment Re:Reality is... (Score 1) 125

But you will need it, should you be in a car wreck, fall off a bridge or cliff, or even do something as silly as slip on the sidewalk and bang your head. There's all sorts of things that might happen. Hell, you might even suffer one of the many potential massive coronary type events, including those that have nothing to do with how you live (John Ritter ring a bell?) So yes, you should pay in, or have a magnetic tattoo stamped on your forehead that you are uninsured, so when the medics arrive at the scene with your prostrate body, a quick scan will be all the time they need to determine they can leave you there for the coroner, and also bill you for the $1K+ for their trip out to read that fact. (magnetic forehead tattoo that penetrates your skull, so a mere scalping via a motorcycle wreck won't remove the ability to read said tattoo, in case any one is wondering)

Comment Re:Damn I used to like southwest (Score 1) 928

I don't think that was the issue here. The real issue was that an opinion about a gate agent on twitter resulted in SWA publicly humiliating and inconveniencing him and his family over something he posted online. Something that couldn't even be taken as a threat by the most hyper-sensitive TSA agent. That's the real story here.

Comment Re:Vote (Score 1) 200

Well, you have to start with Gb somewhere, and the most profitable areas seem logical. If the telecos won't, then someone else has to. And, TBH, the telco's (and cable) have been doing everything they can to move away from common carrier rules. If the telcos stop serving the rest of the community (hint - the major cost was in laying copper, not in running it) then I suppose the municipality can go ahead and pick that service up too. It wouldn't be a bad thing. Don't forget that fed universal fee, the municipalities may be better off running it themselves if they want decent service.

Comment Re:Avoiding Amazon Web Services? (Score 1) 168

You don't move to AWS if you care about budget, uptime, control, security, nor ownership of your data and software.

* Budget - cheap to free to develop on, rapidly escalating costs for enterprise usage.
* uptime - AWS has had notable outages with relatively long recovery times. It's happened more than once.
* control - see uptime - you had no options when that happened.
* security - ultimately, you cannot control security if you don't have the hardware, or even software, under your control
* ownership - since you don't own the hardware nor software, all your data and software placed on the server is there for anyone with access to see. And there are people with access.

Comment Re:This is just a repeat (Score 1) 282

You seem to be implying they should fire an H1B programmer and keep the factory worker or middle manager, but unless one of the latter two can step up and do the programming, it's not going to work very well.

At least I'm guessing most of the H1B employees aren't doing middle management or factory work. I could be wrong.

You are wrong.

Comment Re:Why do we have screen savers? (Score 1) 349

It bugs me that my more expensive LED can't render dark scenes without blocking, on any content, BD or otherwise. In fact, any relatively lightly varying gradient has blockiness to it. It also bugs me that contrast is far too high, even dialed down to the point it starts to degrade lesser contrasting images. And then there's the ghosting, even on a 240Hz (claimed) refresh. Didn't notice it at first, but it got worse as I watched it more, and in comparison to the plasma, it's now almost unwatchable except for maybe cartoons and the like. Maybe kids will like it while they're young, but once you notice these things, you just can't get away from it. It's like that bug bite you discovered itches when you touched it by accident, and now it is the worst itchy bug bite ever. What's worse is the 4K LEDs have these same issues, the color depth just isn't there. It remains to be seen if OLED is any better, but at 10-20K for a screen, I think I'll be watching my plasma for a while longer, and maybe pick up a Samsung before they sell out as a backup.

Slashdot Top Deals

Suggest you just sit there and wait till life gets easier.

Working...