How someone made a chart comparing the amount of plastic in the ocean and the number of IE6 installs? Maybe there's some correlation there?

Possible answers:

1) Aliens and their visits to planet earth is real and they are helping us clean up the oceans.

2) The air-planes are spraying some chemical compound or organism which break down plastic / hydrocarbons.

(3) All the plastic can be found in the Bermuda triangle.

So on so on.)

If only we could get Jon Lech Johansen working on this!

Because we have more CO2 in the atmosphere when we used to have for a long time and the amounts increase fast.

Like so:
http://climate.nasa.gov/400ppm...

Can't we just film it and call it Big Brother 2.0?

Personally I would had wanted to find out if my country really deserved to lit on fire or whatever he's just a chicken.

For the short time I was a regular at Head-Fi the Koss KSC-75 was popular among the cheapest headphones. It's not in-ear though but not actual cans either, whatever they sit around well enough for your activities I don't know but they may be worth taking a look at.

Yes!

Regardless this shouldn't make it to Slashdot.

This is news for nerds - Not news for hipsters!

[citation needed]

You argue weird. They know it's not solution for 100% of their power demand so they don't do it.

That's not an argument against what they are doing though.. since.. like you know.. they aren't going for it 100%.

Hence all renewable energy combined

That is was briefly have already been covered.

It has been pointed out the price of getting the solar panels had dropped (was it 40% in how many years?) and part of that may be to higher demand so at least there's that.

Also I've read that the nuclear power energy from a new nuclear plant in UK ended up being very costly and Finlands new nuclear power plant ended up costing much more than what was planned too. So there's that.

Plus I saw some article about how much Uranium we had .. uhm.. possibly in reserves (at current sites? In general?) and how much was mined vs how much would be needed if one where to build up nuclear power plants to cover fossile.

Personally I think one should build thorium-salt reactors if possible and not regular old uranium plants and obviously only build them if they are cheaper (and possibly accept them anyway if they can provide power when wind and solar doesn't.)

Here in Sweden almost 50% is hydro power so I guess we can buffer fairly well with that.

lol :D

Oh well, more recently they hit 74% with all renewable energy combined:
http://thinkprogress.org/clima...

Maybe the 50% is correct for this year or other pages have just picked up the hype and not checked the sources or noticed the dates either.
http://www.thelocal.de/2014061...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/qu...

Did I Fucking Love Science got it wrong?
http://www.iflscience.com/tech...

More 2012:
http://www.marketwatch.com/sto...
I can't see a year here:
http://theweek.com/speedreads/...

Anyway, even if it has happened recently too it's less impressive when it has already been done more than 2 years ago..

Which is cheaper?

For looks I'd prefer the De Loreans.

Then you're doing it.

If you just allow anyone Internet access through you?
(Which in itself isn't a crime.)

But ok.

Then again if everyone did this would that law make sense / be resonable to uphold?