Comment Re:The first? (Score 1) 197
1) Flood the Netherlands.
2) Have it come up again.
3) ???
4) Profit!
1) Flood the Netherlands.
2) Have it come up again.
3) ???
4) Profit!
...and not one has said that killing the founder of Twitter is a good idea!? </s>
So they sent a death threat.
But what did they REALLY want to say?
Other solutions:
http://www.schwalbe.com/en/spi...
http://surlybikes.com/bikes/mo...
http://yubabikes.com/cargo-bik...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Or whatever, the http://indiegogo.com/projects/... would be relevant in time.
^ This isn't funny. It's informative.
Or well, without being a question it would be.
(Was never posted back when I wrote it due to cool-down period. Old tab.)
Linux doesn't have to be either.
Assume there's a proprietary Nvidia driver.
Anyway using someone else got themselves to blame.
It's ok to demand specific hardware and software requirements.
OS X has more of a chance at becoming a capable gaming OS than Linux does
I'm not convinced.
Snobs who always have argued they for whatever reason don't need games because supposedly that ruin their creativity / other software somehow blended together with a company which argued about the same and didn't bothered about games.
Most don't run OS X (of course they don't run Linux either but in the case of the desktop the OS X likely is kinda "meh" too.)
Rather humanist.
No need for it to be ignorant and in denial.
The support is light-years ahead, unless it's one of the licensed PowerVRs.
Oh trying to decide whatever light-years ahead actually make sense or not when it comes how far one technology is ahead of another one
"This must be what quantum physics is all about!"
It was a small planet somewhere in the vicinity of Betelgeuse. So it could have been a neighboring system. Because when talking on astronomical scales, the vicinity of a star can cover a tremendous amount of space. After all, space is big, extremely big. You wouldn't believe just how big it is...
Is that when the universe is viewed in the perspective of say petunias or when it's viewed by mice?
Encryption is for terrorists! By imperial order all communication must be done using unencrypted VNC shared screens!!
Them to.
Anyway, it explains why your government needs it.
Can we take down the environmentalism straw man yet?
Tar sand is still worse, better infrastructure and higher availability would likely make things worse because more of it would be consumed, more oil available = lower prices = higher usage.
a terrorist event could be considered a "success" just from emptying an AK magazine into a crowd at a mall, even if the attacker(s) were killed immediately after opening fire.
Denmark:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...
Such fucking stupidity it's allowed into Europe.
In the case of France as I've understood it there was no escape plan. Of course there will be others with similar ideas who will still think it was a success and good.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-...
Don't understand why we have to destroy our countries. Guess the good part which can come from it is that more of them actually like the freedom and rather than the agenda they want to pull that "west is struggling to uphold its values" or whatever it will be the Islamic majority countries which will lose their fundamentalistic ways and go secular and humane or whatever.
Who knows.
Crap.
Beat them at their own game:
If you don't kill people for Allah you get SEVENTYTHREE VIRGINS at Paradise 2.0!!
As a vegan myself I just accept that bought food sources will kill so maybe that argument doesn't hold and moral and ideas are subjective.
So I don't accept the notation that "this is good and that is bad" as a scientific / complete truth.
However I don't feel responsible for whatever stupid others participate in and I won't take responsibility for whatever someone else do regardless of what they claim was the reason for it and I'm claimed to be it.
Only an ahole would say something like that anyways.
To make it more accurate it would be something along the lines of:
Every time someone burns a Quran ___ ____
Censored not to get registered as something which I'm not. But you get the point.
Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.
