Comment Re:My money is on SpaceX (Score 1) 211
They have the vision and agility that NASA lost in the sixties.
I get smacked down here for suggesting that NASA is no longer the best agency for moving the space program forward. SpaceX soft-landed two boosters in the ocean and are ready for a land trial. They did that in their spare time. It would have taken NASA 10 years and $20 billion dollars to replicate that achievement. NASA also relies on contractors with obscene overhead rates.
SpaceX is living proof that NASA wastes billions.