Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Numbers Stations (Score 1) 448

Maybe this is what numbers stations are for? It's Russians handing out activation codes to their (or our) weapons!

No, I'm not suggesting this is actually true, but issuing keys that have to be periodically entered to keep a weapon active makes a degree of sense. A stolen weapon won't immediately deactivate, nor will those of an ally who turns coat, but come the next update period, the key issued is one that works for everyone except the people you want to lock out.

Of course, governments don't REALLY want to do this, or it will quickly be pointed out that insurgents/terrorists/freedom fighters are continuing to use weapons that could have been deactivated.

Comment Re:Known For 50 Years (Score 1) 58

Unfortunately though, I can report that among professional musicians, drugs (legal or not) are an occupational hazard. I know it's far from the only profession where this is the case, but keeping out of trouble in school does not always correlate to keeping out of the same kind of trouble afterward.

Comment Re:in the meantime : (Score 1) 204

16:10 means that while watching a 16:9 video, you can pop up the control panel of the player without obscuring the video itself. Also, people who like the taskbar or equivalent on the bottom of the screen appreciate all the vertical pixels they can get. Personally I bit the bullet and adapted to putting the taskbar on the right on the machines that have vertically cramped displays, but it would be nice not to have to make this choice. Even at 2048x1152, I find I want more vertical pixels often, and only occasionally want more horizontal pixels. That's why the second (of three) monitors is rotated.

Comment BBSing. (Score 1) 231

I ran a BBS back in the day. When I took a job that required being away for months at a time, I eventually decided to let someone else run the BBS. This involved everything but the physical hardware -- he continued the board exactly as I'd handed it to him, and other than the change of phone number and half day of downtime, many people hardly noticed the difference (for a while, till he fucked it up).

The problem came when his board got hacked, and he accused me of having something to do with it. (Never mind that I could prove I had been on aforementioned job until a week AFTER the hack.) Authorities were involved. I was questioned (by telephone only) by police, who determined that although I had sufficient knowledge to perform the hack (and I didn't deny this), I had neither the opportunity nor the motive. His board got hacked because it was a cobbled-together collection of software that I had assembled myself, and he didn't know how to maintain. It turned out the hacker was one of the three people I had left in control while I was away on the first assignment, who knew the system almost as well as I did.

Comment Re:Higher Resolutions in Bigger Screens (Score 1) 204

This may not be practical, but I'm still glad to see companies driving bigger displays with higher resolutions.

Me too. It may be more than current video cards can handle, but personally, I typically go through two video cards for every desktop computer, and two to four desktop computers for every generation of displays I buy. That means the video hardware will get there.

Comment Re:In other news: Are 4K displays worth getting ye (Score 4, Insightful) 204

Do you have eagle eyes or sit close to the screen? (Yes, and no, in my case.)
Can you see the scan lines and pixels of a normal, good-quality display from a distance greater than the diagonal size of the monitor itself? (I do.)
Have you ever set shell windows to 6 or 8 point fonts so they don't clutter up your screen(s), yet still find them legible? (Also yes for me.)
Are you looking to reduce the WALL OF DISPLAY effect without losing precious real estate? (I have three monitors totaling 6.5 MPix, and wouldn't mind at all if I could reduce that to two [I'd still want a video display for watching across the room] or just one [if the scaling works well enough to do said video]).

If you sound anything like me, then yeah, you probably want this. If you're one of the types that runs a display at something other than its native resolution ALL THE TIME, because everything is too tiny for you, then you almost certainly do NOT want this.

Comment Re:Ban when you are done testing? (Score 4, Insightful) 322

I never understood this. There's no need to "bust bunkers" You just need to collapse the entrance, problem solved.

Every entrance? Are you sure you got them all? You've never been inside and your recon tools only look so far under the surface. Are you still so sure?

I'm not on the side of war, but at the same time, there are times when a "hard target" has to be taken out, and having an option that isn't nuclear (or horribly poisonous like depleted uranium) is a good thing.

Comment Re:"Against a wall" (Score 1) 149

I don't know about you, but I prefer to have my desktop machine as far away from my ears as the cables will allow. This also means putting it out of reach to set anything like drinks on top of it. I do have an 8-channel mixer and a USB3-SATA drive dock on top of it, but I have to stand up and take a couple steps to reach either of those.

If I could do it without knocking a hole in the wall, I'd put the whole machine in a different room so I don't have to hear it or feel its heat.

Comment Re:Neurons aren't just in the brain (Score 1) 28

Perhaps this will end up with robots being mind controlled also- where an operator thinks about grasping an object in a hazardous area and the robot does so as naturally as a human could via a prosthetic. This might make dangerous situations like entering a burning building or a fukishima type plant disaster easier due to a lot of the controls being created for human interaction verses remote robotics.

You just reinvented the waldo.

Comment Re:Binary yes, planet no. (Score 1) 115

Anything that is a sphere and orbits a star is a planet. Asteroids don't have sphere shape. Same goes for comets.

Ceres and Vesta are nearly spherical, yet are asteroids. Do they get counted as planets too? (They used to be.)

You're right that the definition was tailored to keep the number of defined "planets" within reason. There was no way to include Pluto in this category and NOT include Eris, Haumea, Makemake, etc., so the definition was tailored to exclude them. It also happens to exclude Ceres and Vesta, though it wouldn't be a huge problem if they were considered planets (as they are the only two members of their class).

Comment Not a tetrachromat, for sure. (Score 1) 267

Being male, I can't be a tetrachromat, but on more than one occasion I've demonstrated better color discrimination than is considered typical for males (at least as I've been told by female graphic designers). Although rare, these defects do occur in females well -- I had a girlfriend who had difficulty distinguishing between pale pink, pale orange, tan, and light gray. This was limited to pastels though, she was fine once the color saturation got bumped up a bit.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...