Comment No, that makes it uninteresting (Score 2) 88
Wake me up when there is pricing, and I'll decide how interested I am. I'm not interested in a product which could cost $INFINITY dollars.
Wake me up when there is pricing, and I'll decide how interested I am. I'm not interested in a product which could cost $INFINITY dollars.
Awake
I woke up about quarter after seven, and Destiny was already up and had coffee started. "Hungry?" She asked.
"Yeah, I am. Did we even eat dinner last night? Did you tell the robots to start breakfast?"
"No, I wanted to try something new for breakfast and wanted to see what you wanted to eat first. You know I'm a history buff, well, I found a really old recipe in the computer called a
No, I said both sides of a thermal superconductor enclosing shell are at 149.6F.
Haha. Here are your words.
At equilibrium, the enclosing shell radiates the same power out as the heated plate did before it was enclosed. But its area is 1.0025 times larger, so its outer temperature is 149.6F (338.5K) instead of 150.0F (338.7K).
A_h*T_h^4 = A_c2*T_c2^4 (Eq. 3)
For the moment, let's pretend the enclosing shell is a thermal superconductor, so its inner temperature is also 149.6F (338.5K). Energy conservation at equilibrium just inside the enclosing shell shows [dumbscientist.com] that the heated sphere will warm to an equilibrium temperature of 233.8F (385.3K)
But its inner temperature ISN'T 149.6F, because it's being heated from the inside, not the outside. You calculate a temperature due to heating on the inside, with its area, then account for a reduced temperature on the outside due to increased area, then try to turn around and say the temperature on the inside is the same as the outside.
I'm not changing a thing. This is the same criticism I gave before (just in more detail). And you're STILL full of shit, you pretender. This is the most ludicrous thing I've heard coming from someone who claims to be a real scientist in years.
I've heard some "doozies", as they say, but it's doubly hilarious that I've pointed this out to you three times, and here you are still trying to defend it, rather than simply saying "Oops, I messed up."
It is A WASTE OF MY TIME to argue with you. You don't learn. I won't do it any more. And I'm going to give a copy of this to my grandchildren.
No, I said both sides of a thermal superconductor enclosing shell are at 149.6F.
Haha. Here are your words.
At equilibrium, the enclosing shell radiates the same power out as the heated plate did before it was enclosed. But its area is 1.0025 times larger, so its outer temperature is 149.6F (338.5K) instead of 150.0F (338.7K).
A_h*T_h^4 = A_c2*T_c2^4 (Eq. 3)
For the moment, let's pretend the enclosing shell is a thermal superconductor, so its inner temperature is also 149.6F (338.5K). Energy conservation at equilibrium just inside the enclosing shell shows [dumbscientist.com] that the heated sphere will warm to an equilibrium temperature of 233.8F (385.3K)
But its inner temperature ISN'T 149.6F, because it's being heated from the inside, not the outside. You calculate a temperature due to heating on the inside, with its area, then account for a reduced temperature on the outside due to increased area, then try to turn around and say the temperature on the inside is the same as the outside.
I'm not changing a thing. This is the same criticism I gave before (just in more detail). And you're STILL full of shit, you pretender.
Again, as long as the enclosing shell is nearly the same size as the heated plate, those areas are nearly irrelevant. And because it's a simpler problem (like a tricycle) one should master it before trying to ride a bicycle with complicated view factors. I already specified my areas. Again, neglecting area ratios predicts that the heated plate warms from 150F to 235F after it's enclosed. Accounting for area ratios similar to Earth's predicts that the heated plate warms from 150F to 233.8F.
No "enclosing shell". Two parallel plates. The original thought experiment is two parallel plates (we can make them of equal volume and dimensions just to simplify, but it's not necessary). I repeat: we briefly discussed "even if it were enclosing" but that's a complication of the original, and we'll solve the original first.
What the fuck am I doing? I actually started to solve this for you, after telling you I wouldn't. It must be very late on a Friday night.
Also, I don't think we're assuming black bodies. The best we can realistically do is grey bodies that absorb in all the relevant frequencies under discussion.
What the hell. Anything is better than your "thermal superconductors" that you then claim are different temperatures on different sides. Do you remember that is the second time you tried to pull that? I bet not.
Currently with inflation at 1.5 - 2, the budget should be balanced and taxes moderate.
If you really believe inflation has been at 1.5-2%, you're either a complete loon, or you haven't tried to buy a house lately, or you've totally swallowed the government Kool-Aid.
OR, more likely, you've just been letting the wife buy the groceries and not listen to her complaints about the prices.
For fuck's sake, man, if you knew how CPI was calculated you'd never listen to that BS.
Shitty? I've got a 486DX4 laptop using memory I got from pricewatch.com in 1996.
And it's still working.
All of my memory bought from Pricewatch has worked fine and is still working to this day.
img is shorter than picture. good job bloating the code, whomever is responsible for this.
Amazon doesn't have monopoly power. No point in trying to learn from history when what you're learning is bullshit, son.
"You can also read it on any Apple computer."
I can most certainly guarantee your ass my Motorola-powered OS7 Apple laptop can not and will not read those files.
Also, now days there is no such thing as "an Apple computer" because it's an x86 piece of shit like every other computer out there.
Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse