Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:1-way encryption (Score 1) 269

value of the recording vs penalty...

The value of the suspected recorded content may give the owner of that content far more political leverage than some stupid law gives his oppressor. This, of course, only applies if there exists some sort of [even potential] automated dissemination of the aforementioned data. If the oppressor knows the user has the only copy of potentially incriminating evidence, it would be a very different and dangerous circumstance for the user.

Comment 1-way encryption (Score 2, Interesting) 269

This is the perfect opportunity to use some sort of crypo that encrypts the data stored (video, whatever) in a block by block fashion as it is recorded, but encrypts with traditional PKI so that there is no open session to attack. Also, the secret key shouldn't be stored on the device but instead reside with the news agency, trusted friend in another country, etc. In a nutshell, devices from video cameras to general-purpose gps-enabled geek toys shouldn't be made into easy tools for a repressive government to compile evidence against the user of the tool. I also realize though that these repressive regimes could just outlaw the crypto and make that penalty very harsh/cruel/insane, but then there's also the whole field of stenography, and this cat and mouse game can still continue ad nauseum. I really would love to build something like this out of a DV camera and some sort of small embeddible computer that could handle the I/O and crypto at DV rates.

Comment Encrypted Voice?!?! (Score 1) 219

I wonder if the phone allows access to the voice API in such a way that encryption can be added for voice calls (not VoIP). If the phone can emulate a phone modem with at least 9600bps of bandwidth and let me use the mic/earpiece of the phone is I/O devices, this would be a good start. 2 Phones could call each other as modems, exchange some sort of session key and go secure. It would also be really nice to be able to activate the modem mode during an existing call.
Linux Business

Submission + - Adobe Flash on Linux -- Why still broken?

mwilliamson writes: "As I sit reading my morning paper online I still cannot view the embedded videos due to auto-detection of my flash player not working. Every 3 or 4 Youtube videos crashes my browser. I remember sometime back reading that Adobe has a very small development team (possibly only one) working on the Linux port of Flash, then it dawns on me that Flash on Linux is the one major entry barrier controlling acceptance of Linux as a viable operating system on the desktop. No matter how stable, smooth, flashy, efficient and correct Linux runs on a machine, the public will continue to view it as second rate if Flash keeps crashing. This is worst example of being tied down and bound by a crappy 3rd party product in which no Linux distribution has a bit of control over. GNASH is nice, but just isn't there 100%.

I really do have to suspect the source Adobe's motivation to keep Flash on Linux in such a deplorable state."
Media

Blu-ray BD+ Cracked 521

An anonymous reader writes "In July 2007, Richard Doherty of the Envisioneering Group (BD+ Standards Board) declared: 'BD+, unlike AACS which suffered a partial hack last year, won't likely be breached for 10 years.' Only eight months have passed since that bold statement, and Slysoft has done it again. According to the press release, the latest version of their flagship product AnyDVD HD can automatically remove BD+ protection and allows you to back-up any Blu-ray title on the market."
Yahoo!

Submission + - Yahoo Hotjobs won't accept OpenOffice .doc files 1

mwilliamson writes: "I just submitted the following via Yahoo's HotJobs feedback mechanism. Call me pessimistic, but I suspect this will never be viewed by human eyes. The problem I'm trying to alert Yahoo to is that HotJob's 100kb limitation is blocking the smallest OpenOffice saved .doc files as OpenOffice probably doesn't compress the files the same way.

Here's what I submitted:
The 100kb limit on .doc formatted resumes is preventing those of us who use OpenOffice from being able to upload our .doc resumes as OpenOffice saved .doc files are not compressed in the same manner. Typical short MS-Word files are around 40kb each and short OpenOffice .doc files are just a tad over 100kb each. Please consider changing this limitation to support the open-source community. Additionally, please consider allowing RTF, PDF or even OOXML formats as well."
Wireless Networking

Submission + - FCC Rules update July 20, 2007 -- 802.11a concerns

mwilliamson writes: "The FCC is will soon require protocol changes to 802.11a to automatically avoid interference to military and weather RADAR systems using the 5 GHZ spectrum. At best, this will probably require a firmware update on your access points. More information can be found at(PDF): http://www.cisco.com.nyud.net:8080/application/pdf /en/us/guest/products/ps5861/c1244/cdccont_0900aec d801c4a88.pdf

Quoting from this article: "In order to operate in the 5 GHZ bands radios must comply with two features that are part of the 802.11h specification-Dynamic Frequency Selection (DFS) and Transmitter Power Control (TPC). DFS dynamically instructs a transmitter to switch to another channel whenever a particular condition (such as the presence of a radar signal) is met. Prior to transmitting, a device's DFS mechanism monitors its available operating spectrum, listening for a radar signal. If a signal is detected, the channel associated with the radar signal will be vacated or flagged as unavailable for use by the transmitter... [SNIP]...All WLAN products that ship in Canada and the US on or after July 20, 2007 must meet the DFS for FCC requirements.""
Patents

Submission + - High court ruling bad news for patent trolls?

mrleemrlee writes: The Supreme Court has ruled against a company that held a patent on adjustable-brake pedals, and in the process, invalidated a test that's been used to determine the "obviousness" of an invention. It will make it tougher to meet the test, and could invalidate thousands of patents on small improvements in existing inventions. Full opinion: here.

Feed Private Equity Drooling Over Huge Patent Rewards; Investing Millions In Patent H (techdirt.com)

It's no secret that getting a random broad patent and suing companies that actually innovated and succeeded in the market is a huge money maker these days -- even if it's exactly the opposite of the intention of the patent system. However, with so many headline-grabbing rewards for such patent lawsuits, it's really no surprise that the big money is rolling in. Last year, we mentioned that VCs were starting to get into the game, but these days it's the east coast hedge funds/private equity guys who are joining the party. Earlier this year, we wrote about one such fund, Altitude Capital Partners who had quietly invested in Visto, but made it clear that it really only cared about companies who had patents that could be used in lawsuits. John points us to a Forbes article that talks about Altitude and other private equity funds that have raised hundreds of millions of dollars solely to support patent lawsuits. In other words, if you thought things were bad in the past, they're about to get much, much worse. Once again, almost all of these lawsuits aren't about protecting the interests of an inventor at all. They're quite often cases of independent work on fairly obvious "next steps" in a market -- where the company who actually succeeds in bringing a desired product to market gets punished by someone who didn't successfully bring a product to market. Too often the patents are vague, exceptionally broad and have nothing to do with anything particularly new or innovative. That's not about promoting innovation -- it's about promoting patent attorneys.
Red Hat Software

Submission + - Red Hat Readying RHEL 5 Real-Time Product

GeekGal writes: "Red Hat is preparing its Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 real-time product for release later this year. The decision to release a separate real-time version of RHEL 5 marks a significant shift for Red Hat, which initially planned to bundle the technology into RHEL 6, the next version of its enterprise server operating system software. The current plan currently for the software, referred to internally as Red Hat Enterprise Linux RT, is to have a capability set that is primarily a kernel drop and replacement for standard RHEL 5, eWeek is quoting (http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,2121656,00.a sp)Tim Burke, Red Hat's director of emerging technologies as saying. The RT product will also be priced separately from standard RHEL 5 and will not be included as part of the normal customer contract for that server software. Red Hat also plans to productize its implementation of the Advanced Message Queuing Protocol, Burke said, noting that most of those users also have high-speed messaging needs. "But our AMQP offering will not require customers to be running RHEL RT," he said."
Intel

Submission + - 8-Core Dual Xeon "V8" Test Rig Performance

MojoKid writes: "Back in January at this year's CES show, Intel was giving the press glimpses of a rig in their booth dubbed the V8. It was essentially a dual-socket workstation platform outfitted with a pair of quad-core Xeon processors for a total of eight cores — hence the "V8". The enterprise platform that this box was built around is based on Intel's 5000X chipset, aka Blackford, and it supports up to 32GB of FBDIMM serial memory. HotHardware has a component build-up of a more current Intel V8 machine here, with preliminary benchmarks, pictures and more details on this 8-core dual Xeon powerhouse."

Slashdot Top Deals

Lots of folks confuse bad management with destiny. -- Frank Hubbard

Working...