Comment not a question (Score 1) 111
I just wanted to say "thanks" for many, many hours playing your games. Well done, sir!
I just wanted to say "thanks" for many, many hours playing your games. Well done, sir!
Red for stupidity.
thank you for capturing my thoughts on this so succinctly...
it's an **awful idea**
the idea might be a bit half-baked
imho, it's not a bit half-baked, it's all the way...*this idea is awful*
my first thought was, in order to detect on females you have to have intercourse first, which kind of defeats the purpose...also, checking the color (i can just see the antics w/ attempting to use a cell phone light...) is also going to be more awkward than any of the alternatives
these ideas never leave the concept stage
if something like a condom can indicate this, just make a test swab or something...it's already awkward having to stop and turn on the light to check the color...
But Microsoft is the one who dictates what technology Samsung must play nice with...
The difficulty is first with Microsoft, and Samsung's 'fix' wouldn't be necessary without it.
This isn't the first time an OEM has compromised the security of its users.
Blame has to go to Microsoft *first*...it's illogical to blame the cart for something the horse chose to do.
nitpick - the Victorian pink really was just pale red, rather than the crazy hot pink we have nowadays (hooray for synthetics!).
Your point stands.
I basically agree, but have a nitpick: the old boy's color was more red than pink - since the advent of synthetic colors we have a lot more variety. Blue was definitely a girly color in the past.
Mr. Krebs, thank you for the time.
My question is about defining "computer security" in relation to public perceptions vs technical facts.
It was reported in 2006 that the NSA was keeping massive databases of American's phone calls and metadata: http://yahoo.usatoday.com/news...
Obviously, Snowden's revelations were much more heavily reported, and contained more info, but the public was shocked at information that was already public.
When it comes to cyber security customers, how do you explain and contextualize what service you are providing given the vast differences in perception of "security"?
Heck, we aren't talking about some banana republic here. Or are we?
I see you're not up to date with current german politics. We are.
Merkel doesn't give a flying fuck because she really doesn't give a fuck about anything. She was trained very well how to get into and stay in power, and that's the only thing she's doing. Every move of her makes sense if you analyze it from that perspective. This is no different - big trouble with the USA is not a career-improving path, but the people of Germany are too forgiving and will let her and her party get away with all this shit.
How much Slashdot do we need to know in order to be called a geek?
Natalie Portman and grits.
Jon Katz.
You insensitive clod.
In soviet Russia,
The eponymous effect.
Libraries of Congress (per second).
Wesley Crusher.
Real Programmers don't eat quiche. They eat Twinkies and Szechwan food.