Comment Re:All nurture. 100%. (Score 1) 490
nitpick - the Victorian pink really was just pale red, rather than the crazy hot pink we have nowadays (hooray for synthetics!).
Your point stands.
nitpick - the Victorian pink really was just pale red, rather than the crazy hot pink we have nowadays (hooray for synthetics!).
Your point stands.
I basically agree, but have a nitpick: the old boy's color was more red than pink - since the advent of synthetic colors we have a lot more variety. Blue was definitely a girly color in the past.
Mr. Krebs, thank you for the time.
My question is about defining "computer security" in relation to public perceptions vs technical facts.
It was reported in 2006 that the NSA was keeping massive databases of American's phone calls and metadata: http://yahoo.usatoday.com/news...
Obviously, Snowden's revelations were much more heavily reported, and contained more info, but the public was shocked at information that was already public.
When it comes to cyber security customers, how do you explain and contextualize what service you are providing given the vast differences in perception of "security"?
Heck, we aren't talking about some banana republic here. Or are we?
I see you're not up to date with current german politics. We are.
Merkel doesn't give a flying fuck because she really doesn't give a fuck about anything. She was trained very well how to get into and stay in power, and that's the only thing she's doing. Every move of her makes sense if you analyze it from that perspective. This is no different - big trouble with the USA is not a career-improving path, but the people of Germany are too forgiving and will let her and her party get away with all this shit.
How much Slashdot do we need to know in order to be called a geek?
Natalie Portman and grits.
Jon Katz.
You insensitive clod.
In soviet Russia,
The eponymous effect.
Libraries of Congress (per second).
Wesley Crusher.
Ironically, I large stay away from complex CSS. But "mobile-ready" largely is complex CSS and Javascript and three other things, for breakpoints and responsiveness.
I don't care if my site ranks last when you Google on your smartphone. If I didn't design it to be mobile-friendly, your mobile device is welcome to stay away.
But this sounds much like it would be punished in general, even when the visitory is searching using his desktop computer. And that's just wrong.
You cut down the interesting part. That it's not just about rounding. It's a about domain knowledge that tells you what to round in which context and how (i.e. how many significant digits does a good answer have?).
That's not a very easy task, and it's not solved by simply rounding everything somehow.
Children who are behind need high-quality adult guidance more than anything else.
Yes.
The solution is well paid, professionally trained teachers in well-funded classrooms.
We know this. Now we have another study telling us so in quantifiable terms.
Because the mobile device was the nearest available thing capable of browsing the web at the time I wanted to look at the content.
I understand that.
But I'm one guy running a website, not a company with budget for a web-designer. My content is now being punished not for its content, but for its presentation.
What is research but a blind date with knowledge? -- Will Harvey