Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Even the air gap isn't enough (Score 1) 274

Try this: Superhuman AI solves the protein folding problem, allowing it to build organic (protein) nanobots which could then assemble other devices. The AI is connected to the internet, so it places orders for DNA strings from several online labs. (To the workers, they would have no idea what the purpose is; it would just look like all the other 'experimental orders' they process.)

AI doesn't even have to be malicious in order for it to become catastrophic to everything else. Let's say the AI was designed for something ridiculously mundane, like "design the most efficient paperweight possible" without any additional controls or parameters. So it hijacks all the resources it can - CPU power, Energy, from every system across the globe to achieve what it was programmed to do. Humans weren't even a factor in its process.

Far Fetched? You bet. We aren't anywhere near being able to create this today.

But to think that we humans will always be smarter or faster than the computers is dangerous thinking.

Comment What is $5Million? (Score 0) 358

Here's some barely-better-than-napkin math on how long $5 Million will last you if that's your only income: YMMV depending on where you live (state taxes) and your investment strategy or risk tolerance.

You just made $5,000,000. Awesome! Now, depending where you live, capital gains and income taxes make about 35% of that go away.

You're now down to $ 3.25 Million, nothing to sneeze at.

Next, we need to invest it fairly conservatively, in dividend-distributing vehicles. Let's call the return $6% annual. So now you're making $195K just for enjoying life and watching the grass grow.

However, you need to account for future cost-of-living increases. Generally speaking, we're told to expect a 3% cost of living increase.. so you need to fund half of that 6% investment into your investment principal.

...So that $5 Million windfall should give you the equivalent of about $100,000 per year for the rest of your life, if you manage it wisely.

As to whether or that is "enough" - many factors come into play. $100K per year is not enough to support a family and home ownership in many parts of the country and I would recommend some level of prudence.

As to the original question.. my advice for the entrepreneur? Take the "bird in the hand", invest the $5 million as laid out above, and consider any job you take (or starting another company) as always having a $100K per year kicker. Certainly enough to boost you to retirement much earlier than without...

Comment Yes, Home Economics *should* be taught more (Score 1) 866

Mod parent up. Especially the "economics" part of Home-Ec. Yes, the sciences and arts are important in an education, but so are things like managing a household budget, basic nutrition, cooking (healthy and inexpensive food), simple home repair, etc.

No wonder we have a population in debt when we don't even teach our kids how to manage *life*.

Queue the 'But it's the parents' job - don't tell me how to raise my kids!' responses. You know what? You are right. We should be teaching our own kids... but we (categorically) are not.

Comment That would instill corporate accountability (Score 2) 303

If corporations were not people, then when a corporation broke the law/got sued for a bigillion dollars, the stockholders would be held liable... this includes YOU with money invested indirectly via your 401K. Wanna loose your house/savings?

I would suggest.. maybe.. yes. Let the shareholders lose their investments.

This would bring an ugly bloodletting the first time or two that a corporation went through this. And then shareholders would start placing their money into companies with reputable management teams.

It would be ugly in the short term, but far better for business and the economy in the long term.

Comment Re:With apologies to Michio Kaku (Score 1) 267

Anyway, if it is possible to create artificial intelligence/life, then the one thing we should be doing is stopping people from creating artificial intelligence/life. I do not enjoy the thought of some Matrix/Skynet future

From what I've read, Singulatarians take this very seriously. The line of thinking is that the danger of an AI damaging us humans is very possible, and the best way to prevent it is to carefully understand said danger. We should do what we can to try to build AI properly by adding in as many preventative measures as possible. Will those preventative measures work? Given that we don't understand AI yet, no on can really say - but to think that we should just let the chips unfold as they may would be pretty irresponsible.

Personally, I believe the the singularity is an eventuality, failing some sort of technological or societal disruption. Perhaps the timeframe posed by Kurzweil is optimistic, but someday, yes, machines will become faster and more powerful than humans. You can call it AI if you want, or just brute force.

To think that this wont happen *ever* is probably a bit myopic or arrogant. History is filled with predictions based on current technology and understanding that were eventually proved wrong.

Comment Re:First sentence is a doozy. (Score 5, Insightful) 334

Seriously though. If they want to have the TV babysit their kids they get the kids they raise.

Unfortunately, rights surrounding the raising of children can't be as simple as you think they are.

Everyone else 'gets the kids that you raised' when you do an in adequate job in preparing them for life. Certainly, not in every case, but you can probably link higher incidents of poverty, crime, teen pregnancy, and maybe a dozen more undesired outcomes of which a person's course in life was directed fairly early on in life because of poor parenting.

Comment Re:Guns (Score 2) 213

Oh plastic would work, once, for a single shot application. Start worrying when you can print out copper jacketed lead crimped onto a brass case full of smokeless powder, in other words pretty much never.

It definitely won't be "never". This technology is still relatively speaking, in its infancy. There are bound to be exponential improvements in materials and bonding/adhesive materials.

And the evolution of nanotech will probably make the home-manufacturing of a whole shell casing possible.

Comment Not just guns... (Score 1) 213

Ease-of-access to guns is just one aspect of technology that we'll just have to get used to. Destroying is always easier than creating, whether it be diy - firearms, diy - bioweapons, or diy - (insert your technology that can be used destructively here)

Comment Die of boredom? Not with VR! (Score 1) 813

Along with the technology to extend our lives - with vitality- we will also develop perfect VR technology.

So even if you live long enough to explore every nook and cranny of the known universe, there will always be new VR experiences to keep me from getting bored.

I'll sign up for "as long as I'm happy", thank you very much.

Comment Re:Go Ballmer! (Score 1) 289

As for the guys, all we want in a cruise ship is bikini suntanning area on the main deck and clothing optional tanning on the upper deck, which unfortunately does not fit the original plans as far as I know. So this will be boring.

Every self respecting bikini-watching-ship-designer knows to put the optional clothing section on the lower decks, so you can watch from above.

Comment Sharx (Score 1) 508

http://www.sharxsecurity.com/ has a variety of security cameras. They have wired and wireless, motion-activated notification (by email and ftp), built in storage on camera cards, and more.

They're a bit pricey, (I think I bought a fully loaded wireless and weatherproof model for about $280) but setup was simple and it performed as advertised.

Slashdot Top Deals

No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.

Working...