Your response demonstrates that you failed to read and understand my points. There will always be limits to freedom of speech, but those limits are much more restrained in the US than the UK, just to go down the list:

It sounds a lot like you're walking back from "near absolute"

And just for the sake of pedantry, it's worth mentioning that no one has a Constitutional right to free of speech.
Our right to free speech is natural and the Constitution limits how the Government can infringe on it.

/I'd also be interested in seeing your citations on the fighting words doctrine being overturned, the Supreme Court doesn't really agree with you.

Or because Apple hasn't (acknowledged that they have) been hacked yet.

It is, they're just increasing the punishment.

I can't help but think that anyone who believes this is anything less that wildly ignorant about the Constitution and Supreme Court jurisprudence.

Here are some broad exceptions to the constitutional right to the freedom of speech:
1. Libel, slander, and various forms of misleading statements
2. Inciting others to violence
3. Fighting words
4. Disturbing the peace (offensive words can be considered a breach of the peace)
5. Intentional infliction of emotional distress
6. Copyrights & trademarks
7. Obscenity
8. Commercial speech

I may have forgotten one or three, but I think that suffices to make my point that there is nothing remotely like a "near absolute interpretation of the constitutional right to the freedom of speech."

Equally important to the point I'm trying to make is that at least 5/8 of those exceptions were well established as law when the Constitution was written.

The original concept for the cellular network was a series of big outdoor towers which talked to indoor base stations.
Of course, building owners didn't want the expense of (retro)fitting small indoor cells, which led to a lot more outdoor towers than envisioned.

I think it's interesting that 100% juice does not have the same effects.
Juice is increasingly being treated as junk food by dieticians and nutritionists because of its sugar content.
They don't even want juice to be treated as part of your recommended consumption of fruit.

Anyone who actually needs a 5k display should already have a backup system in place.
It's only real purpose is so graphics designers can work on 4k media without dual screens and for industrial/medical fields where high res images are normal.

The truth is, if you want to watch 4k media, you're better off with a 4k display.
Upsampling &/or stretching to fill a 5k display is less than ideal.

The closest thing to what you're describing was a 2013 SciFi series called http://www.syfy.com/robotcombatleague.

They were hydraulically powered humanoid robots that beat on each other until either one of them stopped functioning or it went to the judges' decision.

You seem to completely ignore the value of institutional knowledge.

Maybe in your world, everything is documented, but everywhere else, knowledge of certain critical business processes is only retained in the memory of a few employees.

Slashdot even had a nice conversation about it a few years ago
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/12/04/1742211/institutional-memory-and-reverse-smuggling

The hardest part of getting a new SSN is gathering up originals/certified copies of the documents you need to support your application.
http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0248-do-you-need-new-social-security-number

Please don't spread misinformation.

"Standard" media that isn't consistent sounds like a massive failure of quality control by the manufacturer.
Does no one make a quality growth media?

You might want to re-read the 4th Amendment and then pick up a history book.

The Founding Fathers have always considered border searches reasonable.
The first Congress passed a law about it in 1789.

To avoid summarizing 225 years of jurisprudence, I'll give the broad outlines of what isn't a reasonable border search.
1. Anything personally invasive or painful: strip searches, body cavity searches, x-rays, surgery
2. Destructive searches of property
3. Lengthy detention

And that's pretty much it.
You've never had an expectation of privacy at the border.

Better for the poor, better for the rich, worse for the middle class.
http://www.factcheck.org/2007/05/unspinning-the-fairtax/

Show me an alternative tax structure that doesn't lower the tax burden for corporations or high earners by passing it onto the middle class and I'll support it.

You might want to re-read your Econ 101 textbook.

The most important aspects of a monopoly is its ability to raise market prices (abnormal profits) and/or exclude competitors.
Technically a company with 50% market share could do this, but for practical purposes, the threshold is considered 70%~80% of the market.

Markets with very few competitors (oligopolies and oligopsonies) can behave like cartels, without any formal collusion, giving everyone a chance to earn monopolistic profits.

Cable tv and utilities (power/water/gas/phones/sewage) are considered natural monopolies, but they weren't always.
If you dig around in US history, competition for utility infrastructure was tried and it failed miserably.

The Kickstarter page makes no mention of encryption between my device and the Egg.
Nor anything about encrypted storage on the device itself.

If your selling point is personal security, you should really be mentioning how your device is meaningfully secure.