Here, after all this bitching and thinking I came up with something more constructive. If you want to socialize health care, some kind of price control is almost mandatory, as in you can't trust a goat with a cabbage, or a wolf with a goat, when taking them across a river puzzle way, just like you can't trust insurance corporations to come up with fair prices, even if free market competition is supposed to help, but when you remove the buyer's option not to buy, then things are even more dire compared to price fixing and monopoly/oligopoly issues even in the regular free market. For instance back in the 1930's, outside US jurisdiction, I think centered in Switzerland, there was a price fixing scheme where tungsten filament electric lights were tested from different suppliers, and if any of them surpassed the 1000 hr lifetime, the companies were punished, in a sort of cartel agreement that was equivalent to price fixing, or creating lower quality parts on purpose than a free market would have allowed. There are various collusions like this, sometimes tacit, or understood and not openly agreed on between various suppliers whose demand is very hard compared to price, such as gasoline, and often gasoline companies rake in the biggest profits in world history by charging abnormally high prices when the consumers are addicted to or a slave to that purchase. So it's not so silly to create a universal healthcare marketplace where the buyers list their prices, and the corporations get the government aid, like GM or Chrysler but not Ford. You could have a tax table, with a range, such as a 22 year old male can pay between 50-75/mo for health insurance, and list it online, knowing that if he pays 50 the insurance company he buys from will most likely require more government aid because of him, while if he pays 75, then less, and for a 40 year old between 100-150/mo. Then insurance companies would get a chance to pick the higher paying ones fantasy football style one at a time, and when none pick the lower paying ones, then we force them to accept on an equally distributed burden basis, trough lottery picks, or some one at a time in sequence. If a lot of people voluntarily pay at the high end of these spectrums, then you could kind of increase the ranges for the next tax year, and if everyone pays at the low end, then it's like a vote that nobody has that extra money. There could be negotiations between insurance companies and government agents on these ranges, just like weapons suppliers negotiate price too, but there would be better oversight on the costs by knowing how much government aid each insurance company had to get that year. You could still have government agents and insurance CEO's play golf together, or play corruption games, but you would at least have some tax table, like the gas tax, that's equally distributed in the population, and "soft welfare" in the sense that individual citizens would know they are contributing to government aid going to the insurance companies they are buying from if they pay on the low end of the range, but it does not come as a hard direct hit under their individual social security numbers they have for life, and are responsible to care for.

The very idea of a incorporating is irresponsibility, in an effort to enhance entrepreneurial risk taking and business activity, without any of the owner's personal assets being at stake or backing responsibility. Incorporating is like getting a new social security number for a company, who has its own taxes, but it can freely go in and out of existence, and restarted under a different name as a different company, while people with social security numbers don't freely go in and out of existence, because nobody likes to die, and they haven't invented easy reincarnation yet. As a sole proprietor of a business one acts under their own social, and when they get sued, their house and car are at stake, while an LLC is a setup where there is at least one person or officer or owner whose personal belongings is at stake, and everyone else is protected in a corporate sense, and their private assets are safe from lawsuits and only the business assets are at stake, or responsible. (Often these officers are some grandpa in a nursing home without any assets left, or someone similar, and it's cheaper to LLC than to Inc., on the state fees and legal fees, as long as you can find a poor sucker who has nothing that you can list as the responsible one on the list of owners.) Promoting corporate responsibility I hear on PBS is like an oxymoron, the very purpose of incorporating your business is to protect your personal responsibility in its actions, and it's easier to start a business and undertake risk that way, and create jobs. All major companies in the stock market are Inc's.

So what I'm getting at it's better to shame the insurance corporations with government aid, because they don't care, they don't have ethical objections or mental roadblocks against accepting government aid, because they are free to die and be reborn with a clean slate EIN, while the employees of such corporations, or customers buying insurance are stuck with their social for the rest of their lives, and the record follows them around for their entire life. This way you can soften the blow, or create "soft welfare" where individual citizens know they are contributing to dragging the country down by paying insurance at the low end to corporations that will most likely need more government aid, but without a hit on their credit, so to speak. And insurance corporation CEO's could still buy their yachts and play golf with the government officials, because government agents are corrupt, but there'd be more direct oversight over insurance company expenses, and nitpicking at what they do, and individual citizens maintaining freedom from being on government aid, and by that the free and open right to shop for nonessential items on Ebay for a good deal, and their individual spending habits are not nitpicked, but the insurance company internal finances are. This way you could maintain the benefit that a for profit or nonprofit insurance company that pays millions to its CEO's provide, which is they in turn nitpick at hospital costs, and tell their clients to go to one hospital vs. another, or negotiate deals with various doctors, which in itself is hard work, and best done by private self interest agents as opposed to fixed price government bureaucracy red tape machine. But you do have to regulate the price in some sort of even distribution way like you do gas tax, where individual citizens are not discriminated against but by knowing what age they are, what sex, and the like, can look up their own cost from a tax table, and choose a number within that range, in a sense getting a bill from an insurance company at the higher end of the range if in the past 5 years their total hospital expenses were high, vs. being able to be on the lower end of the range for their age and sex if they've been successful in staying away from health care needs.

So here are some constructive ideas - flexible price control, universally distributed cost on an equal or fair basis across the population, and not penalizing someone requiring high healthcare costs more than forcing them to pay at the high end of the range based on their age and sex, and the rest of the country bearing the burden, as opposed to the way it's set up now, where the insurance companies will try to shake these high cost people off their balance sheets with unscrupulous techniques, because if some requires 50,000 surgeries 4 years in a row, there is no amount of Obamacare payment under their social that makes it profitable to keep such people for those insurance companies, other than charging 50,001 dollar at least each year for the premiums, so they would try to shake these customers, even with Obamacare, while if there is government oversight and direct aid to the companies themselves, in an FDIC way that banks are protected, they don't have an incentive to shake the sick people on an individual, discriminating direct hit to the bottom line basis, but the actual, overall statistics would matter, where the government picks up the tab of the unlucky insurance companies like the FDIC picks up the tab for the unlucky banks, but individual citizens know their maximum cost, which is negotiable on a yearly basis by insurance and government agents, then submitted to a general vote like a school levy, as the rates increase, unless some insurance competitors can find a way to drop their cost, and the government only accepts say 50% of the pool of a willing insurance company candidates, who are guaranteed government aid profit, at their bids, or 80%, while the 20% not accepted and not done business with learn they should have bid at a lower price if they wanted to make money. Managing and overseeing a relatively small pool of insurance companies is a lot easier than insuring fair dealings with millions of individual citizens at the mercy of policy prices and willfull shakeoffs if they happen to get sick, even if it creates even more government red tape, and corrupt agents golfing with their insurance buddies where they either had a job or will get a job when their government tenure is up, but here, if you want forced healthcare purchases, you have to get involved in the fairness part, and it's easier to regulate and nitpick and private corporation finances, who don't really have ethical objections or mental roadblocks against accepting government aid and being monitored and regulated, compared to millions of individual citizens who want to maintain their right to clock deals on Ebay, and their finances not to get nitpicked at on an individual basis, and their healthcare payments equally and fairly distributed with rules that are know ahead of the game, such as based on age, sex, and actual cost in the past 5 years, encoded and tabulated into tax law.

As if the tax code is not complicated enough as it is.

Let's have a buyer's Affordable Care Act Obamacare, where we violate free market transaction rights of the seller, of not entering into a transaction they don't find to be a good deal for themselves, instead of the present way it's set up. Where the financial nonperformance dragging the government into further debt over not being able to manage own finances and needing government aid shame gets credited under the campaign contributor insurance company's Federal EIN, instead of the individual taxpayer's social security number. That way tax payers can stay as honest citizens, and we can institute universal coverage by forcing insurance companies to sell at whatever price the buyers feel like paying, and if the insurance companies accrue a loss at the end of the fiscal quarter or year, the trillions of dollars bankrupt government being dragged into further debt is gonna be ascribed as their fault, not the individual taxpaying citizens. Insurance companies will not be allowed to go out of business, because the government will guarantee payments to them to keep them alive, and once some taxpayer lists the price they are willing to purchase health insurance at, such as a 22 year old broke college student listing $5/mo assuming he's not gonna get sick anyway so he's overpaying on the gamble as it is, and then if no government sustained campaign contributor insurance companies are willing to sell at that price, then we roll some dice or take turns on equally distributing the burden, to come up with which insurance company is forced to sell at that price. That's what I'd call fair online marketplace for health insurance where the government forces parties to a deal to transact even at prices they don't find to be a good value for themselves, and ponies up the dough for them when they are unable to live up to those prices. I do not want forced government aid listed under my social security number as much as I can help it, because I want to maintain my freedom, in such things as being able to shop on Ebay, which, when the government pays my bills, I no longer have the right to do. I would have no problem where I keep a clean slate, and the government aid is written off under the insurance companies federal tax EIN instead of my social security number. Let's have a vote on this, see what the taxpayers think?

Bleh. Quack. It's like this: in Canada they have socialized health care, tax supported, but inadvertently they make you wait forever, and do a poor job, like Free Clinics in the US, which have been available even without Obamacare, and if you want really high quality health care, you go to a private for profit hospital in Canada too, that's gonna rape you in the ass with the bill later, and you may spend the rest of your life trying to pay it off, but you can get toppest quality health care in the Milky Way Galaxy, the only issue is that you cannot afford it, but you have choices. Even with socialized healthcare like Obamacare, you're gonna end up with a Canadian like setup, where the socialized insurance bankrupts the country or you through inefficiently directed payments or allocated funds in and economic sense, going into insurance company pockets and kept away from doctors and hospitals who would buy equipment on it, compared to a pure FREE market economy, where the only major abuse is monopolistic competition cutting behavior and price fixing, such as not enough doctors or hospital systems. In a free market a doctor is free to ask for any astronomical amount, and you don't have to buy, or he can refuse service Seinfeld's Soup Nazi style, but he can provide top quality care unheard of in the entire galaxy for these astronomical prices. Once people are forced to make purchases by the government, then the nitpicking at prices starts. Such as doctor salaries, price of goods, and the commies tried running an economy with fixed prices, such as salaries based purely on level of education completed and GPA achieved, without regard to anything else, or even regulating prices of goods, such as every canned vegetable had a factory printed price and it was illegal to sell it for a different one at Walmart where the shelves are hand stacked, or Aldi's where they throw it out before you on a skid like feed to pigs, and you're a pig that loves low prices, so you don't mind, but you'd expect these places to charge different prices based on quality of service delivered to you, but in a price regulated world they can't. The FREE market solves things so much better than the commies did, with government intervention in everything, where you cannot be forced to shop at either Aldi's or Walmart if you feel like shopping at Costco or Sams Club, or vice versa. Even in communism the peasent market at arbitrary free prices sustained the whole show like putting the daily bread on the table, not the government run corrupt red tape machine, where you had party idiots without any skills in charge of companies and factories that were not allowed to be shut down over bad performance, and the whole system collapsed. The government has to butt in with running a military, or police or even roads, but it butting in into mandatory education, law, healthcare or religion purchases will inadvertently cause price issues, or people paying for things, like excessive insurance company profits, and money kept away from the hospital and thereby receiving a bad quality care of bad deal for all that money they spent, as opposed to the way we believe in the FREE market, that ultimately such schemes are doomed to fail and shut down and people will take their money to health care places that give them a better value per dollar, self regulated, in a you can trust a person to get the best deal for himself in everything in life including healthcare and education than the government butting into his purchases. If anything, as a lesser evil, Obama could force people to pick a hospital and make monthly, quarterly or yearly donations to it, like to a Church, to keep doctors in business and available even in absence of a disease, and that way you could cut out the middle man the insurance guy running off with your money for almost no benefit provided to you, other than a gamble, and then every dollar lands in the pockets of the doctors or hospitals that way. Or even having to pick a family doctor. But for one, I don't have a personal family doctor, or a car repair shop, and I've taken my car around, including to some places where a guy I know well, whose customers are mostly black, would run into issues doing quick repairs for me in a hurry if I'm willing to pay more and cut me as a white guy in line of his other mostly customers still waiting for an estimate for many days now, so he has to chase me away and not do business with me at all yelling that I'm always in a hurry and cannot leave the car, saying he'd love to work on it, he loves working on cars, it's how he makes a living, but he cannot deal with me if I'm always in a hurry and unable to wait, and his livelihood depends on the black folk that live in the neighborhood he runs his business in, and I understand completely, and I drive another 40 minutes to a far out fancy suburb in the middle of a mall that still stands in the USA today, and take an ass raping on the price of repair from some strangers at top quality service and with having my car available ready the same night to go to work without much sleep that day, as opposed to having to rent an expensive car at quarter of the repair cost per day. So you can't really make me pick a car repair shop or even a family doctor, that I'd keep in business even in absence of car failures, and they rely on actual demand and price, the fancy repair shop sitting mostly empty and ready to take care me at a high price, and the low cost shop make me wait in line, just like the fancy grocery stores might be empty but the low cost ones crowded, in a you get what you pay for sense. The government butting in leads to price regulation, and inefficient allocation of resources economy such as people forced to pay insurance profits and keep the money away from doctors, compared to direct out of pocket payments. And they are free to support their family doctor, hospital, car repair guy or lawyer through donation payments even in absence of service, like they support their church or public television or wikipedia, if they have excess money to work with and want to maintain such luxuries available, in a sense purchasing insurance where every dollar lands in the pockets of the high skilled long education needing service provider and insures high quality service, like a car repair guy, lawyer or doctor, as opposed to some middle man insurance gambling low skilled not even a high school diploma needing the streets is my alma mater salesman running off with most of it as profit. But as an insurance it might bite you in the ass too, as in you might be paying a family doctor or car repair guy all your life for decades without needing much service and then when you actually need it, they both suddenly die, and you have to take your car or your body to another repair expert, and pony up some new dough for it. In a FREE market you have these options, but you don't have to exercise any of them, and the service providers have the right to refuse service, like the Soup Nazi, in a go somewhere else to make your purchase, way, when you're discussing payments, if you're bogged down with money issues, which is a shame when it comes to education, law, healthcare and religion (but not that much shame with car repair.) It's like being bogged down acquiring oxygen to breathe by a teacher, doctor, lawyer or priest, and having this perverse insatiable desire for more, more, more oxygen, like the gas in the Russian Sleep Experiment, like your life depends on it. And it does, but it's like you need some oxygen to function, and that should be enough, and then go focus on the real thing, education, healing, justice or soul sheperding. And even in education, having better tools like computers or science lab equipment, makes things better, but you get very well educated people from very poor regions of the world like India and retards out of really expensive schools, and in law and religion it's like you almost need no tools other than your own mind and body, and a few chairs, maybe a court recorder, while in health care true you need equipment and substances more than you do in schools, and in this sense you could be told to donate to the hospitals like to a church which in turn send you a brochure of what all equipment they bought and have available for you or your village should anyone get sick, including expertise to use it, but even with top of the line equipment you might have stupid doctors and bad health care, like bad teachers with top of the line computers, and good health care like good education provided with barely anything but the very basics like a chalkboard or proper medicine like antibiotics available. Btw these substance control acts are all bullshit too, I should have the right to go to a pharmacy and purchase some penicillin, today, instead of overdosing on heavy metal toxicity bismuth like over the counter pepto bismol, as opposed to being forced to go to a doctor and ask penicillin from him, who instead sends me to the nut house and I end up shot up with Haldol I don't need and destroys my abilities to function for a whole year til the healthcare professionals finally take me off of that bullshit I hated being on in the first place. I cannot be forced to trust any doctor with my own health, if I can't find a single doctor I can trust I have the right to puchase penicillin myself, just like I cannot be forced to have to trust any lawyer, or hire a lawyer as a consultant, and have the right to self represent in court, without a hired agent. People have the right to DIY in everything. I don't understand what's so complicated about all this? I am my doctor first and foremost, and have the right to hire a consultant or not to, and I have the right to purchase medicine that's right as opposed to the inefficient and maybe toxic over the counter stuff, like bismuth, roach killer antifungal borax sold as washing powder, or selenium sulfide sold as anti dandruff shampoo. What I really need is erythromycin and penicillin, and it's available in pharmacies but I don't really have the means to manufacture them myself, such as temperature controlled citrus mold growing, on philippine soil fungus growing right now, and I cannot get to them in pharmacies where they are for sale, because the doctors all wanna send me back to the nuthouse if I show up with a throat infection at them. These things are the very simple basics of justice and liberty people in charge don't seem to comprehend, the right to free market purchases of medication, and you are your own doctor first and foremost, because doctors do not know with certainty what they are doing, because the human body is complicated, and they don't understand it, but are playing guessing games. They know a lot, but they cannot guarantee what they are doing, when push comes to shove they have to admit they are guessing, and because of that I'm the proper authority in charge of managing my throat infection, even in absence of price discussions, and when it comes to price discussions, I have the right to refuse serice, or even if I ask for service, I have the right to refuse paying for piss poor service. If I take my car to a car repair job for a muffler repair but in his best judgement as an expert he thinks I need the breaks changed and the car painted from green to blue, and goes ahead and does them without my consent, and refuses to do the muffler work, I have the right to refuse paying him for it, and if anything, I have the right to sue him for painting my car a different color (or even changing my brakes when I did not ask for that, such as I was going to get that done with another guy, it's not his business to decide for me what's best for me and my car) and wasting my time not doing what I asked for, I don't care what kind of expert he claims to be I am the proper authority over my car, just like I am the proper authority over my own body. A doctor cannot cut me if I don't consent to it, and has to let me take my chances dying. There was a gipsy woman in the old country, where the doctor pressed her to abort a pregnancy because she and the baby will certainly die. She told him, you know what doctor, "Kill ya own kind," and she went ahead, gave birth and everything was fine. Doctors are guessing, and ultimately you are in charge of your own life, your own health, not some doctor, and you have the right to buy penicillin at the pharmacy without a prescription, unlike the corrupt laws have it these days. The one thing I cannot perform on myself is brain surgery, at least without some good mirrors, risking to pass out while doing it, but even if a doctor is absolutely certain I will die unless he jumps my head with a knife and starts cutting, I am in charge of my health and my life, and have the right, like the gypsy woman, to take my chances through a natural course of events and not get cut, and the doctor has no right to jump me with a knife unless I agree, or administer forced injection of substances into my body, unless I agree, and I have the right to cut myself or administer substances if I feel I need them. These are the very basics of Medical Ethics 101, the right of a client to refuse service, or the right to take care of himself, as he sees best fit, including DIY self procedures, or self medication. The right to purchase medicine in absence of a signature from some corrupt doctor, called a prescription. How can you trust others, like a doctor or a lawyer, with your interests better than you can trust yourself? The very basics of the Declaration of Independence is inalienable INDIVIDUAL rights because the CROWN, or the monarch, or the state, pretending to represent the best interests of the hive, tends to be corrupt, as proven over and over in the long run. The 5th amendment protects the INDIVIDUAL interest in face of the interests of the many, such as not being forced to testify against yourself such as what religion you practice, such as a Pilgrim or Quaker, when everyone else around you is Anglican, or even the right to INDIVIDUAL Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness, when you're a Jew as an individual, and the CROWN representing the interests of the many happens to be Hitler. What more of a Socratic Method of arriving at the truth when you seek it do you need than that? The whole creation of the USA is about WE THE PEOPLE send a message to WE THE KING OF ENGLAND, that we believe that all men are created equal with INDIVIDUAL rights. As in you're a Boston Tea Party member, and the CROWN happens to be King George, wanting to extract profit into his treasury from his new colonies, while the colonials escaped from Britain in the very first place to escape the abuses of the Crown, and the Tea Tax, a relatively minor thing which was an obvious precedent for a whole lot of taxes to follow with very heavy burden and lots of economic hardship was the straw that broke the camel's back, and they finally got it off their chest what really bothered them, including not having religious Liberty in Britain, under the dominance of the CROWN, nor the rest of the Bill of Rights for INDIVIDUALs, that were not respected in Britain, where everyone was assumed to be a patriot LOYAL SUBJECT of the CROWN, putting aside their INDIVIDUAL concerns for the interests of the CROWN. In the USA being a patriot is not being a loyal subject to a monarch, or some other persons having priviliege as a birthright, but an equal citizen with equal rights protecting the form of government as a Republic. The interests of the many count, of course they do, but not in some abstract, monarchic sense, but in a sense where the INDIVIDUAL rights of the many are protected best, and you cannot blindly trust authorities who happen to be in absolute power at the moment, like Hitler, or King George, including judges and doctors, and you have the right to protect yourself against abuses of the leaders or the many, including 5th Amendment ones to remain silent, or presently no amendment to administer penicillin to yourself if you see fit, while telling no to a doctor trying to administer whatever she wants to into your body, or cutting you with a knife. You have the right to refuse treatment in healthcare, and you have the right to refuse paying for it, and in turn, if they want to, they have the right to refuse service, or in practice they can do misservice such as sending you to the nuthouse, if they feel like it, which is a corruption case pretty much, it'd be much better if they just sent you away over reasons of money than teach you a lesson by providing bad service, but that's what is. You have the right not to trust doctors and you have the right not to show up at a hospital, and if they don't do what you ask, you have the right not to pay them, including not paying them in advance via some insurance. These are INDIVIDUAL rights. Unfortunately the best way to run a ship or a business or even a country is to have a captain, a leader, who we put in charge and almost blindly follow what he tells us to do, but the very first 2 amendments, the right to express dissent, and the right to bear weapons for the very purpose of overthrowing a corrupt leadership, in a sort of mutany against a corrupt captain or doctor, still stand in the Land of the FREE and the home of the Brave. Even with bees, a species with highly complex societies that have been through a lot longer evolution than human societies, and have sort of specialization of function that go all the way to birth rights, such as a queen who's the absolute captain of a hive, and lives for many years, while the workers she all mothers die after a few weeks each, even there they have a procedure of overthrowing a failed queen, often for simple reasons such as she has run out of sperm after the many years and all the eggs she lays are infertile, and this procedure is called "balling", where the worker bees whose function has been as a royal aid, feeding jelly and helping the queen in her egglaying duties, they gang up on the queen and ball her by suffocating her blocking her trachei and stinging her to death, and once her royal scent dissipates, the hive switches into a new queen rearing mode, and if they are unsuccessful after a few attempts, with the scent suppression gone for too long all the worker's female sex organs develop, and the hive is doomed because all the eggs the workers lay hatch as males, and there is no queen to lay queen eggs or worker bee eggs. Even such naturally privilege by birth containing societies have overthrow or mutany mechanisms, and, in 3 billion years humans might have alien queens and worker bees and privilege by birth, but even then there is still a need for mutany procedures, like the 2nd amendment guarantees it under an equality Republic today. How long til Obama nitpicks at the 2nd Amendment. Remember when he first got elected all the gun stores went empty, people fearing he will take away his guns? And he might, and then we'd all be ready for even more abuse from the leaders on top, or another Pearl Harbor, this time hitting Portland or Seattle instead. In Switzerland it's like a duty for every citizen to own a weapon. Don't fuck with our guns, we don't care how many terrorists or lunatics run rampant with guns, that's a small cost to pay compared to living under a dominant abusive leader like Hitler who fails to protect everyone's rights equally, but efficient overthrow mechanisms, such as the attempt Rommel partook in, are lacking.

What you need, before libraries, schools and public infrastructure, is money in the bank and food on the table. Yes health care is a need, but pimping mandatory gambling policies over it is bullshit. I have the right to show up at a doctor uninsured, with an unsure promise that I will make an effort to pay him later, and if he's not willing to work on me like that, that's fine, I don't want him touching me then. I have the right to keep him in suspense whether he's gonna get paid or not, based on the kind of work he does, and I'm the one to decide whether he did a good job or not, not some insurance company. A doctor pokes around in uncertain territory, because the human body is too complicated, and when he's unsure, I definitely want him to err on the side of not doing anything compared to making extra cuts or performing extra procedures, because some insurance will pay for it anyway. Just look at the situation with car insurance paying for repairs, and some corrupt shops having a sledgehammer used as a "moneymaker" between the time a car is dropped off and the insurance adjustor arrives. I'm not saying doctors are that corrupt, but if any doctor is so money focused, then he might be too tempted to make that extra dollar in a way I don't agree to. Having doctors work on you while you're uninsured is like a right, as he will work in a way where the only things he does are ones that are absolutely necessary in his mind and he'd do them for free too, just to save your life, and he will not do "extra." And then I'm willing to exert a lot of effort to pay that doctor later, or more like the hospital, because the healthcare billing bullshit has deteriorated to where you show up at a hospital, and some doctors see you, they send you a "SEPARATE" bill for like $100, while the hospital, performing procedures based on the instructions of that doctor, sends you a $5000 one, for a few hours of stay. Like what the fuck, it's the same fucking brothel, why are they billing separately? Because they can guarantee calibrated results on blood tests and CT scans, but not on doctors opinions, and in case of a lawsuit, you get back the couple cents the doctor charged you in case he turns out to be in error, but the hospital bill is undisputable, even if it was under command of that doctor, under command of that captain. As far as I'm concerned it's the same maffiozo gang sending you the bill, and they rape you pretty bad on it, because they don't tell you an estimate when you show up, unlike with a car repair, where you can take your car from shop to shop for an estimate, in a hospital they don't let you take your body from hospital to hospital for an estimate. As long as we're talking money, right?
Btw mandatory insurance policies are pretty much forced gambling policies, as nobody will sell you health insurance over a certain cost procedure that's about to be performed on you in 10 minutes, they'll tell you to pay out of pocket, or pay more for the policy than that certain cost. It has to be a gamble to, if you're lucky, cost less than the actual procedure, but in general, for each dollar invested into such gambles you get back less than 50 cents, like on lottery tickets, which is why gambles like lottery or health insurace are for stupid people who did not pay attention in math class, because they are all horrible investments. If anything the government has more right to force you to invest in the stock market, and make you buy stocks you don't want to buy, where at least they could claim they are looking out for your best interest with some historical track record, with an uncertain future of course, so still being a gamble, while the historical track record with all insurance is that for every dollar invested overall you got back less than 50 cents. Mandatory insurance policies are forced gambling policies at ass raping profit to those selling them, and insurance is just a fancy word for a gamble like royal concubine is a fancy word for a hooker. I demand they use the word gambling policy every time they shove a government document under my nose that has the word insurance policy on it, like Obamacare tax documents, or driver's license corrupt law documents they force me to sign at the license bureau. Corrupt motherfuckers all over in the government.

I have to come back and write all this because I'm attacked on the health front to show up at a hospital and I simply refuse to do it, to the contrary, I write you this litany and lesson in the basics, in Freedom 101:

The problem with universal health care the way it is instilled into law today is that it's unfair. We already have tax supported road care that's universal or police and military, however there is problem with universal care through mandatory insurance purchase from for private corporations at arbitrary price and profit, be it car or health insurance, by individual citizen buyers from for profit corporations at arbitrary price. The other "universal" ways are set up via some equally or fairly levied taxes (such as gas tax you pay as you go for road maintenance per gallon of gas), and it is the government that makes the purchases in bulk from private for profit companies such as road service steam roller brigades or aerospace military weapons purchases, and the government has leverage on the price in these deals and all these private for profit corporations are a bitch to the government in trying to clock a deal, as opposed to hanging out each citizens pockets to dry, in an insurance gambling policy shark infested world where each citizen, by themselves, have no collective bargaining power, and are a bitch to the limited number insurance companies that way. If I show up at the East Side Market and all tomato salesmen are trying to sell their tomatoes at $150/lb, I simply don't have to buy. Duh. How simple is that? Even if one is selling at $120/lb, which sounds like a deal compared to the going price, I don't have to buy, and I can set my price at $0.50/lb, and if I cannot find any willing sellers at that price, I don't have to buy, and they don't have to sell. Duh. This is the very basics of concepts of remedial IQ testing in justice and liberty. Freedom, in that you cannot be forced to act in your own interest, and you are the captain on your soul, or your finances, not some fucking paternalistic government pretending to act in your benefit, Timothy McVeigh Invictus style. Often these pretending to act in your benefit things the government institutes turn out to be acting in the benefit of their own pockets, or constituents pockets they represent, or most likely campaign contributors pockets that got them elected, and it's payback time, by passing laws that benefit them at the expense of everyone else. Government run as a business. Law and Justice run as a business, via mandatory gambling policy purchases at arbitrary gambling profit. Jesus chased the usurers and merchants out of the Temple with a whip, and he got crucified for it. But he was brave. Religion as a business? Health care as a business? Law and Justice as a business? Education as a business? They need somebody with a whip to go through churches, courtrooms, hospitals and schools and chase the folks out who desacrate these things with money. Money is a simple fact of life, and churches and courtrooms etc cannot function without it, but to turn all focus in these institutions on money away from the really important things they are supposed to focus on, is like a crime against humanity. What's with the fucking prices in these places? Like healthcare prices, legal prices and education prices? Somebody needs to go around with a whip like Jesus did in the Temple of Jerusalem, and get the price focused usurers away from such places. He was brave and got crucified for it, but we need more like him in the land of the free and the home of the brave, unless you're willing to change the National Anthem from "Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave over the land of the Free and the home of the Brave" to "Oh say does that star spangled banner yet wave over the land of the Slaves and the home of the Chickens."

If insurance companies were all required to be nonprofit - and in that no nonprofit bullshit where the CEO makes millions of dollars with golden parachute plans while his business runs as nonprofit, I'm talking where everyone, from the CEO to all the secretaries work at the Federal minimum wage, and they still run their business as nonprofit, and then we get into the hospital and doctors and nurses prices nitpicking, where each of them are willing to work at Federal minimum wage as nonprofit, maybe then, maybe then we could talk about you forcing me to make a purchase. But I'm not focusing my entire financial world on coming up with some insurance company CEO's million dollar paycheck and 80% profit margin so he can buy his yachts and have leisure time at golf courses. Don't get me wrong, I love people having yachts and enjoying themselves at golf courses, but they have to come up with the money for it through sales of good or services where I'm a willing buyer at a price I find to be a good deal. Forced purchases or forced sales, like the commies used to force people to sell stuff regardless of price, are bullshit. They are unfair.

It voids basic principles of FREE market. Lesson #1 in FREE Market 101 is that its agents or actors are FREE in their actions in it, based on their own personal conscience assumed to be looking out for their own private and collective interests, and not compelled by stupid corrupt laws to act against their own benefit, to their own detriment, so that others can benefit. It's all a matter of price. A seller does not have to sell and a buyer does not have to buy. Duh. A simple concept like this not comprehended by the supposedly top guy in the world, elected as the leader of the FREE world, called Barack Obama. (In fact they elected a black guy for this very purpose, because a rebellion like this under Bush or Clinton would obviously be something novel in the course of hundreds of years of political events, but when white people don't follow this fresh and new corrupt law, they say it's because they are racists. And black people are split on the topic, on the one hand they are proud of a black president, and they want to follow his laws for that reason, they also tend to be more on welfare because of explosive population growth compared to white people, as in, the single most determining factor in poverty levels and government aid levels is family size, so in this sense they welcome white people being forced on government aid too, via Obamacare payments, however they themselves don't really want to buy health insurance that pays the 80% profit margin for golden parachute contracts and yacht purchases by insurance company CEO's, instead, if they happen on some money, they wanna throw some at their cellphones for talk minutes they can sweet talk the honeys on, some at all their baby mommas so they can buy diapers, and the rest to throw a booty booty booty rockin' everywhere party and pop bottles so they can get their big black cock waxed with some fresh pussy juice from since nice big found you Miss New Booty Hoes. These are much more important priorities than buying insurance, aren't they, even if it's called Obamacare insurance?)

If the price is too high, a buyer does not have to buy, in any common sense free market. Just ask the 20 camel caravan towel heads with centuries old traditions in markets, what they think about this? If the price is too low, the seller does not have to sell. Even if there are 100 million willing buyers at $0.02 gambling policy premiums for 6 months coverage purchase, insurance companies cannot be compelled to sell, by some corrupt laws, and similarly, if there are hundreds of insurance companies selling policies at whatever price seems profitable to them, say $900/mo longterm, buyers cannot be forced to buy. How about we pass the counterequivalent of Obamacare, where, instead of online marketplaces listing hundreds of insurance companies and their policy prices, we create an online marketplace where buyers, who are presently insured, list their preferred prices, whatever they feel like listing, such as 2 cents for a policy, and then we pass a law forcing insurance companies to sell at that price? Just to make things fair, tit for tat, in an unFREE marketplace where the government butts in. Let's violate the free market rights of both parties to a transaction?

It takes two to tango in the FREE market, and both minds have to meet in deriving economic interest at a given price before there is a transaction, if one of them does not find that a purchase or a sell at a certain price is a good deal for him, he cannot be obligated by stupid laws to go ahead anyway. Just ask the camel rider caravan turban towel heads. No, I'm not gonna switch the focus of my economic activity life from finding a way to solve the biggest line item on my pareto economic analysis of my expenses, which is presently housing, to health care becoming that, at three times the cost of housing, long term. Take a fucking chance in life. You cannot eliminate or insure away all risk from life, stepping outside your door means exposing yourself to risk, and in that risk where another party is involved, such as a deer, a bear, or a poor and broke person, like a beggar, all of which are unable to pay, even if held responsible, or a party that's able to pay, and lawyers and courtrooms have pretty much have turned into such lawsuit fests, including all the stupid ads I see on TV. There are lots of risks facing your in life where you can't find another party to blame, and you're free to buy insurance against them for yourself, if you want to, at a price you find is a good deal for you, but you cannot force others to make purchases or make sales they don't want to make. For instance you cannot force someone to sell prostitution if they don't want to. I'm guessing most people in the world, even the most devout Muslims, would be willing to do prostitution things in life if they got payed 10 trillion dollars for that single act. As in that's a lot of money, and it buys a lot of hospitals, schools, roads etc, in a who do you think you are that you are so special and not willing to do it way? So what if you go to hell and don't get your 77 virgins when you die, for 10 trillion dollars other people around you can flourish, like your family, relatives, your village or your country. That's a lot of money, and it's a good deal to go to hell and burn in hell in afterlife for that worldly price, $10 trillion, isn't it? It's all a simple matter of price, and you cannot force someone to sell prostitution services at $50,000 per act if they don't find that's a good deal for them, or buy insurance of any kind over a $0.02/mo policy cost, including car or health care if they find that it's not a good deal for them. Forced car insurance has been such a corrupt law, but in a we don't sweat the small stuff in the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, and, like it says in the Declaration of Independence, people are more bound to suffer and bear the unjust incursions on their Liberty then to rebel and create all the issues that such going against the set ways creates. For instance a Camel or an Ass will bear extra strands of straw, just to not create mayhem, but there comes a point where you reach the straw that broke the camel's back, or the donkey's, or you get to the drop of water that made the cup spill, and then, while you're at it, bitch about forced car insurance too.

In education there is an issue of price too, just like in Healthcare. And good educators tend to work at high paying and costly institution, but that does not mean that you cannot find an "education deal" or a bad purchase, as in getting excellent education for a bargain or paying a lot of money and ending up with a crap education.

I for one would be willing to teach for free, or near it, as long as I had no bills, such as housing, healthcare, utilities, food, etc, and I'm working hard to achieve such a bill-free state where the only bills I take on are a small property tax, and the rest are all voluntary, such as internet or cell phone, that I can live without, but I cannot escape property tax. Then you can make everything else yourself, grow your own food, make your own renewable electricity, DIY healthcare, build your own house, and when you have no bills, you can afford to teach for free, or preach for free, or heal for free, or protect justice for free, or very close to free, at minimal expense, unlike the ass raping profit that goes down in education, law, healthcare or even religion, these days.

And I first thought they were talking about some defensive lipstick girls can wear in discos or dance clubs when predators like these approach them: http://imgur.com/gallery/NxLYc... , such as you can find here, https://www.stargazer-products... Now the question is how to make it activate and glow at will in the dark in the disco, such as indium-tin-oxide conductive coating and a small battery hidden inside a hearing-aid-like device behind the ear, and possibly a remote control switch in your pocket.

PS. On another note perhaps it's not a good idea to carve up the Moon into space stations, because so much of terrestrial life has adapted to tides, nocturnal vision, or even the lunar cycles such as women's and other mammal's periods. Possibly it could be turned into a ring orbiting around itself and going around as if the center of gravity of the moon has been maintained, while also providing artificial gravity outward due to spinning and easy life. Most likely some of the Moon will be used to put up like 1% Earth total surface area shades around the Lagrange point between the Sun and the Earth, or even a massive Fresnel lens later if we have mini ice-ages on us again, but the gravitational and light effects of the Moon are depended on by so much of terrestrial life, such as cats hunting at night that it's not worth messing with it. However Mars is a different question, and it may disappear way before the Moon does, and whether it should ever disappear is what I'm talking about here. So the Muslims should probably be safe keeping the new Moon on their flags and top of their mosques and minarets. And all this goes to show that everything I say on here has to be taken with a grain of salt, or two.

Oh, just one more thing, Colombo style. Or two:

- aluminum may be efficiently vacuum distillable out of silicon. Of course more difficult than magnesium.

- ammonia does not combust in air at room temperature, but it may burn fine if the reactants are preheated. Such as via Stirling engine style heat recouperators, possibly used in tandem. Such as a catalytic converter that gets red hot, split into two channels, one for the air intake, the other for ammonia intake, for preheat, while another pair of catalytic converter-like heat exchanger gauze gets heated by the exhaust, then you switch. If you can make the intake-exhaust long, even coiled or zigzag, you could recover even more heat by heat exchange. Such old school preheat the tandem brickwork and switch was common in the 1800's, for air preheat to a furnace. Also in the 1900's when gasifying coal - run air to heat it via exothermic combustion, run water/steam to get hydrogen and extra fuel via endothermic reaction, and switch back and forth.

In other words, opinions are like anuses.

It's like you're a Jew, and here comes Hitler, and he wants to vaccinate your kids for the best interest of the herd immunity. And when they die he says, well, we tried, we did what we could, but it looks like the vaccine was not successful in fighting off the infection. What arguments would you use against him if you were Jewish, in such a scenario? Would they be philosophical objections along the lines of INDIVIDUAL rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness as opposed to the interests of the CROWN who claims he's a unifying force looking out for the collective interest of the herd he's in charge of? Are you supposed to blindly trust any King or government, elected or otherwise?

Exactly.
Doctors don't know what they are doing, they are poking around in the dark. They play a lot of educated guessing games, and statistics, but they have no guarantees. Unlike a car technician, who can make a claim that he thoroughly understands cars, and he can fix any car and any car problem, I have yet to see a doctor who can make such a claim about people. The human body is just waaaay too complicated. Simply accounting for all the enzymes, and predicting their behavior in a disease excreted environment is waaaay beyond their abilities. Even if they can compute on a supercomputer the quantum mechanical behavior of enzymes in chemical reactions while accounting for he complicated snake-venom like antibodies diseases excrete, there is still the role of the nervous system in immune reactions, and predicting its functioning is beyond their abilities. Doctors cannot predict my thoughts. What am I thinking now, and what will I be thinking 2 minutes from now. Unless you can perfectly guess these things from present measurements like blood pressure, heart rate monitors, and EEG and EKG, you have not proven to me you can predict what mood I will be in 2 minutes from now, or how my body will react to a disease, because my thoughts affects my mood and my mood affects my adrenalin levels and such which in turn affect my bodies reaction to a disease. I'm free to think anything I want, and I'm free to control my mood that way, and have a say in how my body reacts to a disease in a way you cannot predict, so you cannot say how my body and immune system will react to a disease, whether it will self cure itself just fine, but should I take your vaccine I might die. You have no clue, you play educated guessing games as a doctor, and cite statistics, but you have no guarantees for individual cases. A way to guarantee it would be like this http://weknowmemes.com/wp-cont... Dr Riviera's If I kill you you don't pay guarantee. That means any person ending up dead even after the hospital tried treating them should get their money back. All dead cancer patients, etc. Which doctor can come up with such a money back guarantee? In a, if you don't reach 150 years old under my care, I'll pay you or your heirs all the money back? It does not work like that. You hire doctors as hopefully better experts for advice and treatment, but ultimately you are responsible for your own health, you are in charge of your own health, not some doctor, or some government.

Inevitably it is some disease that does in every person at old age, but if doctors truly understood what they were doing, they could fix any disease and you'd have at least some people who made it to 150 years old, or 200, etc. Unless a doctor can guarantee to me that he knows what he's doing, I'm in charge of my body, not some doctor, or some government that relies on the opinion of doctors.

I'm not only the captain of my soul, or my mind, Timothy McVeigh Invictus style, but also the captain of my body, and not some government or some doctors. Under the constitution people have INDIVIDUAL rights to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, and they are not subject to a overwhelming power CROWN or DICTATOR who can make life and death decisions at whim over them, Hitler style, such as genetic cleanups, or mass vaccinations, for the benefit of the herd. It is the herd, and each of its members that has sovereignty over themselves, and they limit government, and institute collective government only inasmuch as necessary, such as for military defense, or even public health issues, but every individual retains sovereignty over their body, and they should have the right to refuse forced injections even in the case of all juries and all appeal deciding against them, even in case they do have an actual, proven disease, such as Ebola (where test results can still be corrupt and faked by a corrupt system, (sometimes by a single author developing a fake test all test technicians believe), and because of this possibility they have the right to refuse), and instead have the right to live in a quarantine environment just like criminals have the right to be in prison, and lepers have the right to live in quarantine and be fed, unless the herd decides it's worth putting them down death penalty style, because the risk to the herd is too great, such as in the case of serial killers. In such cases you have to treat sick people as you treat criminals, and "measure their worth" as a human being, in a sense, and compare the criminals diseased people, who acquired the disease through no fault of their own, maybe even poisoned-infected by some political adversaries. But as long as you have convicted murderers not executed, same should apply to people carrying a disease where they chose to refuse treatment, a treatment that could kill them. For instance most people who have killed, but they could prove it was self defense, such as a burglar, without a court issued warrant to be present, holding a gun at them inside their homes, don't even go to jail. Even if it was one home owner vs. 3 burglars. He has sovereignty over his domain. (Which is why housing cost has spiraled so out of control, and mortgages last til mort, til death, as in never paid off, just so you never have your domain that requires a warrant to enter.) In this sense every person with a disease has the right to self defense, as in not letting doctors kill him with a toxic treatment, and instead trusting his own immune system and God to fight it for him. And if he can fight off the disease, so should other people of the community be able to, or are expected to. This is complicated, because it's also what you call genetic natural selection. Most of us have resistance to diseases acquired through thousands and millions of years of genetic selection, and asking not to have that selection process in place is like asking not to have an immune system. We have an immune system that knows how to fight off various diseases. If hundreds of millions of years ago, in the state of reptiles before any warm blooded animals on this planet, these reptiles had been scientifically advanced and instituted laws mandating vaccinations amongst themselves, we today may not have the mutations that developed and got selected back then against certain forms of diseases, that we still inherited, and carry, as humans, from our reptilian ancestors, and we'd be all dependent on such artificial vaccination methods of fighting. It's like a sickle cell diseased person can run naked through the Congo jungle infested with malaria carrying mosquitoes and be perfectly fine, while an average person get sick and die, without a vaccine. Also the sickle cell disease person would have to take on the vaccine, possibly suffer harm for it, and his genetic traits that are advantageous under such environments, an adaptation in a life adapt sense, would no longer properly be advantages, including you would not have a higher incentive to marry your daughters off to him because he's obviously not sick where everyone else is. Are you gonna put down a person with sickle cell disease, in case he carries a disease that is deadly for a lot of other people, but he's fine, are you gonna punish him for his successful genetic adaptation, as a murderer of others, or are you gonna quarantine him, and possibly lose that genetic adaptation forever from the herd, forcing all future generations to rely exclusively on vaccines against malaria? In this sense you could hunt down anyone with sickle cell disease and put them to death simple because of risk, because they won't get sick from malaria, or not know when they get sick from it? With forced vaccines the gene pool of gets polluted very fast, so in this sense it's not in the best interests of the herd. And in any case individual rights sound more sacred than herd rights, in a Hitler style I'll kill yo ass if I can declare you genetically unfit polluting our pool with your genes. By whose genetic standards? Some elected government's or kings genetic standards? I play these Oregon Trail games sometimes, and Mary or Katie gets hit with the measles, or the flu, or various diseases, and they are often out sick for 8 or 12 weeks before they recover, or die, from the flu, but such was the genetic selection in the past. These day they have flu vaccines, and it's usually a guess of which 3 or 5 strains of flu will hit this season, out of the 10,000+ known strains of viruses that can cause flu-like symptoms, and if they can predict it like that, and end up being right, I call bullshit and artificial willful infection of the populace, and even if they are sure the vaccine contains those 3 or 5 they are about to release this winter to get everyone sick with, I'll take my chances with my own immune system fighting it off, instead of trusting them not to inject me with mercury or other immune suppressants, claiming they are looking out for my best interests, when they are really trying to kill me when they shoot me up with mercury, and their grandchildren with a real vaccine, in their world view of social Darwinism and ethnic competition for dominance and voting power. No thank you, keep your fucking vaccines to yourselves, do not inject anything into my body unless I ask you to and consent to it, and in fact please do not put any poisons or infections into my food, water and air supply either. Please. The previous place I lived it I could not shut the heat off, which was controlled via a thermostat by an upstairs neighbor, and he "conveniently" got himself into an accident and crutches for all winter away from home, and it was some young kids of who know who's descendants that kept changing the forced air furnace filters downstairs, and I constantly kept choking by some diseases blown in with the air, and the duct tape would not hold against the air vents and always melt off and pop a hole, in my unit. I moved from there into this place where there is no force air heating from outside my doors, with infected filters. In fact, electric heating, even if it breaks the bank, it's a good idea compared to forced air heating that's so in vogue in these States. In centrally heated, there are natural convection circulated from a basement hot water heaters in every room that don't blow diseases all over the place, like one of my uncle has, that are preferable instead of forced air, if electric in each room is too expensive..

Slavery is illegal. They should amend that amendment about the sanctity of the human body and self sovereignty over it by each individual, and that forced injections of medications is also illegal, especially when mental incapacitation has not been proven, where you have to act in the interests of that person, and such a proof should require a trial by jury, in a jurisdiction of the defendants choice, with rights to appeal. Even mental incapacitation is a genetic adaptation, that may stand in life adapts to the circumstances way, and if that person can speak, write or communicate by eye blinks, or breathing, or even blood pressure, and he does not want something, that should be his right, even if mentally incapacitated, and obviously acting not in own self interest by an outside judger, But the right to a jury of 12 in a yeoman farmer non city dwelling domain (which, when nobility landlords force all lowerclass people into cities may not be a good idea if you're lower class, ideally there should be an even equality economically dominant middle class everywhere even if they are not yeoman farmer's per se, the yeoman part meaning equal in economic standing, and even then a lower class person might wish to take it to court in a lower class inner city neighborhood where his folk live, and if they excuse him there, that should be good enough, at least for mental incapacitation cases. Deciding other crimes, such as OJ Simpson style trials, should be conducted in a neutral zone, where neither OJ nor his wife's family have relations, if you can ever find such a neutral zone with neutral jury.

Even then an innocent Jesus might end up being crucified through numerous juries, but the chances are smaller than some ad hoc mock trials conducted inside the mental institution's doctor's domain, with court assigned lawyers that know their bread and butter is dependent on being on good terms with such doctors, against the interests of the mentally challenged people they are supposed to defend. Juries in random, far away places have a much smaller chance for such interests. But it's hard to find even juries that are impartial, in the sense of Jefferson's yeoman farmer being the only truly independent voter, and therefore jury duty person. A city dweller whose existence in dependent on someone throwing them a job, or some customers making purchases, even if they are not paying rent to some landlord, he's still subject to many economic manipulations and cannot be trusted or relied on. A city dweller without an independent means of existence even in the absence of economy and an income is not a qualified, unbiased jury duty person, because he's not a Jeffersonian yeoman farmer who was supposed to be the backbone of democracy.

Ya own two eyeballs have a continuous wash of tear solution, sometimes activated by a quick blink, to keep a mirror finish or optically perfect surface in the middle of a sea storm or even dust storm. It's not that complicated to think of a continuously flowing rinse, possibly a quick brush zoom-by like a blinked eyelid, to ensure near perfect optical cleanliness of mirror finish military surfaces. There are plenty of improvements you can make to R2D2 and C3PO I posted about above to make them more laser resistant.

All you gotta do is change your fashion items really old school, to make yourself and your dog look like these guys:

http://geek-news.mtv.com//wp-c...

You can start by shopping around here:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/MEDIEV...

(see original listing.)

Who said chivalry was dead? It's coming back big time, and you better get your mirror finish polishing skills tuned.

Mars is too small to hold a decent pressure atmosphere, or water in a liquid state, which, even at the triple point near 0 deg C sublimes and vaporizes if kept under low partial pressure. Show me a pressure/temperature/gravity to create that pressure parameter condition, and I'll accept that there might have been water on Mars, but otherwise I'd go for liquid methane or oxygen before I'd go for liquid water. The G-spot of Mars to create H2O wetness on it is pounding lots of moons and aseteroids and debris into it to build it up to the size of Venus, which is about the same size as Earth, but not to build it up to the size of Jupiter where it no longer vents or boils off hydrogen, and that means continuous growth at an accelerated rate into a gas giant with a hydrogen/helium atmosphere because the solar wind is mostly hydrogen/helium. It is possible to maintain steady size with a nitrogen atmosphere like earth dynamically replenished by nitrogen from the solar wind, then blown off by solar wind hydrogen sweep, to a steady state size, hydrogen always guaranteed to boil off. It's possible to sweep other things off with hydrogen, but there is nothing lighter than hydrogen, other than (charged electrons or light) that could be used to sweep off hydrogen to a steady state size that does not constantly accelerate in gravity, captures more hydrogen that creates more gravity, etc. The problem with water is that its melting point of 0C is too high, and once you get that temperature, a gas molecule of H2O with a molecular weight of 18 attains terminal velocity and escapes the gravity of Mars at that 0C temperature. Could you keep water liquid at -200C, where its thermal velocity is too low to escape the gravity of Mars, it would be no problem to have liquid water, but otherwise your options are liquid oxygen, liquid nitrogen, liquid methane, and the like, maybe even liquid ammonia, or liquid SO2, I don't know.

I just looked up liquid water, and came up with Europa, one of Jupiter's Moon, about the size of our Moon, supposedly having a liquid ocean. And the way this works is internal heating, not external solar heat, so the surface is much colder than the insides, just like there is lava kept at 3000 C by uranium thorium and potassium 40 decay in minerals that erupts from the insides of the Earth onto a much colder 20C surface. So it is possible, at least in theory, that there has been water on Mars with an ice surface to maintain the required pressure under it, and internal heat generated either by nuclear decay heating, or by some gravitational roundabout close to a strong gravity object that since has been knocked away or who knows what. Europa goes on a highly elliptical orbit near Jupiter, at the perihelion (see wikipedia and Kepler's law) and when it gets close its shape gets distorted away from spherical that it would naturally assume under self gravity into one elongated toward Jupiter, then as it travels to the farthest point, or aphelion, it assumes a more spherical shape. This constant shape shifting, like a rubber ball squeezed and relaxed, causes internal friction heat even without nuclear heat generation, and keeps the water on the subsurface of Europa liquid, with the outer surface crust being thermally insulating ice, and of course you'd get volcanic eruptions of liquid water freezing very fast into solid ice just like how you have volcanic eruptions of molten liquid rock lava on Earth freezing into solid rock and building mountains.

Which means it may be possible to create an artificial arctic sea world on the Moon too, all you need is provide it with low enough temperature, much lower than Earth, to maintain a surface layer of ice, beneath which you can create a liquid water ocean heated to say 4C temperature, and life, including humans, living on it Captain Nemo style. To drop the surface temperature of the Moon it would need to be shaded, with artificial shade from the Sun (such as putting up huge cylindrical stick like "geostationary" umbrellas that cover much of it's surface into shade) and then you can regulate the surface temperature, and create subsurface heat by either nuclear fuels, or better, through a focusing fresnel lens that sends the sunlight trough a relatively small part of glass that does not melt from the heat, deep under the ice layer onto some black matter, that melts the water there. You could have one such "glass window" through the surface ice, or many scattered around the surface, or just a belt region, a continuous crack filled by silicate glass window near the equator of the Moon, where you focus and concentrate the sunlight into subsurface depths.

Unfortunately the Moon does not have a chance for all this, because it most likely contains a ton of nickel and iron and cobalt and platinum and all that (the Sudbury or Norilsk nickel mines being mostly heavy meteorite impact sites, and whatever you can get from them is probably what you can get from the core of the Moon, so the most probable future for the Moon is that it will get sliced and diced into tiny pieces to make space stations from its material, and it will probably be gone in 500 years like a dear carcass is gone in no time by possums or velociraptors or other such voracious predators ravaging it and ripping it to pieces when it's left behind, all you know is that it's gone very fast. So that's the most likely fate of our Moon, consumed up into space station and space ship structural materials, and once the Moon is gone, that's the most likely fate of Mars too. I don't know about Venus, that's probably gonna be turned into another reservation, to have two Earths that are naturally self sustaining with a meteorite burning gas atmosphere and photosynthetic life on the surface, but Venus will need hundreds or thousands if not millions of years or geoengineering before fully habitable, for the great great grandchildren that end up looking like Alien in 3 billion years. But it's never too early to start.

That's right, I opened a parenthesis, and never closed it. It's what you call free style, freedom of expression, free speech protected under the 1st Amendment.

I woke up thinking this: 900/mo x 12 =10,800 on 8 x 2080 hrs/yr =16,000 gross minimum wage for a family of 4. Insanity. Out of that 16,000 comes the near 10% sales tax, or 1,600, then social security, medicare, and only then income tax, if any. But still aint no fucking tax gonna take 11,000 from 16000 which is what Obamacare tries to be. It's economic nonsense, and it shows that either the democracy is on its last kicks, and whoever owns the system is abandoning a sinking ship and trying to squeeze whatever wealth they can still extract from it during the last minutes before it implodes, or they want to maintain the system but have an arbitrary tax that takes all your money dependent on how Da Man feels like, what he thinks the government should pitch into your Obamacare aid, whether all 10,800 is "on paper" given to you, meaning you get free health care, or you have to pay it all out of pocket. Bullshit. And if you do not agree, we can make you really sick by force. A hell of a world is coming. All I know people don't rebel as long as the stomach is filled each day, so as long as they can guarantee food on the table for everybody, they can get away with anything, such as making sure everyone has a credit score of less than 50, full of bankruptcies, a mile long criminal record, declared a liar, and 8 million dollar in debt on paper, per person, it's all abrakadabra numbers and letters on pieces of paper or computers and don't really matter as long as there is food on the table every day, that's the only thing that really matters. And as long as that's guaranteed the urban populations grow out of control, and when it's no longer guaranteed and hunger starts, that's when any kind of violence and massive riots begin. Even racial riots don't really happen, unless some races have been kept on really tight food supply for a while. The daily bread, food, is the top priority above almost anything else to all lifeforms, besides of course air and water, which are free or almost, and roof over the head and clothing, roof over the head being the single major cost in a distorted way from what's normal on most of today's list of expenses, far outdoing food cost, for now. That's gonna change, eventually it has to, big time.

Hispanics are the fastest growing ethnic group inside the US, faster than urban blacks. Which is the only thing that counts in long term voting power, rate of population growth. San Francisco CA, San Diego CA, San Jose CA, San Angelo TX, San Antonio TX, San Marcos TX, San Luis, CA, San Clemente CA, San Bernandino CA, San Mateo CA, Santa Rosa CA, Santa Fe NM, Santa Maria CA, Santa Barbara CA, Santa Monica CA, Santa Cruz CA, Los Angeles CA, Los Alamos NM, Las Cruces NM, Las Vegas NV, Amarillo TX, Mesa AZ, Costa Mesa CA, Salinas CA, Sacramento CA, Pueblo CO, Durango CO, Natchez LA, El Paso NM, El Dorado AR, (Baton Rouge LA, french also Laplace and New Orleans too), these non-English names describe the long history of who was there first, of course mixed in and interspersed with English names. In the old days territory was conquered with swords or gunpowder, in these days of peace it's done with the phallus, the horny erect penis getting stuck into moist vaginas that are unable to say no to that dick. The whole world is playing chicken with overpopulation issues, and as long as there is voting, and welfare against starvation, popping babies on welfare as fast as you can is what any sane ethnic group should do, until we drag the government welfare funds so deep into debt that they can no longer send out the welfare checks, and then if we still hit that bootay and pop a new "individual" with equal protection in the eyes of the law, the natural consequence will be starvation if we do it in a non economically conscious way. The capacity of lifeforms to breed is or should be infinite until they hit the economic limitations, which is the normal controlling check on population levels. With free welfare money and equal protection under the law to all individuals regardless of race, skin color, eye color, hair color or lack of hair, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or economic status, the economic check is lifted because everyone is guaranteed unlimited access to inalienable rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. In the modern days all these terms are monetized, converted into money, which is why I revised the Our Father a few posts back. Money buys you rights, money buys you life, money buys you territory, and money buys you fame, money buys you reputation, money buys you good ethical standing, money buys you youth (through a plastic surgeon), money buys you weapons, money buys you corrupt politicians who can revise your credit history. Most importantly money buys you territory. Which is really at the core of my personal problems, territory, and in that ethnic control of territory. I bough my house for peanuts in Da Hood trying to show how on minimum wage people in desolate urban areas full of opportunity (cheap housing, public transportation, utilities, TV and radio stations, supermarkets, libraries, monuments) can make ends meet and live extremely happily. However I'm a white guy, and I entered a territory as a white person which was conquered by blacks during the race riots in the late 70's away from Czech and Slovak ethnics, who moved on. They put up a fight for it, and they ain't just gon give it back to white people encroaching on their conquered territory. My girl cousin living with her husband in a still fairly upscale territory around 2000 was told in that apartment bldg by some black folk that "this is already ours." Black folk consider an apartment bldg they rent or even a city block as territory. Like Eddie Griffin says it in this flick, west side west side, nigga dyin over a block you don't even own. https://www.youtube.com/watch?... But he does own it in the end if he succeed harassing and chasing white people away from it, then taking over the county government, and harassing the landlords away with bullshit things like minimum service fees on utilities. I had a homeless black man who called himself Lloyd move into the junk house I bought, and he'd rip the water line down and flood the basement with a tiny puddle in the depression not even to your ankles saying he could not see in the dark, in Dec 2007, so I had the city turn the water off at the street instead of having to turn it off inside the house. I paid the 2007 water bill, but then in 2008 they send me a $600 minimum charge, saying it was an emergency off, but the account is still active, and when I talk to them they say in order to get an account disconnection, they have to come out and pour cement into the sewer holes. And then what? When I resell the house you gonna dig the cement out? Insane. So that's how you can own a city block, by it gaining the county government, then fucking everyone out of their property who hasn't got the same skin color or eye color that you do. And then when I go to work where white people work, they bring the black folk along, just to show it's discrimination when they don't relax job performance requirements and increase cycle times on injection molding machines, to accommodate and make it more comfortable to black people that work there. Yeah white people saved my ass, but they also told me they are not gonna be able to feed their own kids because of me. I told them I'm only postponing the inevitable. The inevitable is that there are no jobs in the back country and back country welfare avoiding white folk travel a whole hour to the suburbs to their jobs, and they don't get their teeth fixed because of cost, and there is only a few hundred of them living an hour away, yet 20 minutes toward the inner city urban side of the suburbs there is at least 100,000 niggas breeding out of control on welfare money getting free dental service who eventually going to overpower the no matter what, simply because of difference in population levels. As long as the welfare checks keep coming, you can have a black dude quit a $14/job at the clinic where his job is to walk around the hospital and change batteries in various things like smoke detectors. His excuse is that he finds it impossible to make ends meet on $14/hr, like pay his rent, health insurance or health care for his 6 kids, gas for his car and food for the family, while on welfare he gets all that for free paid by the government under the equal rights to life liberty and pursuit of happiness for all individuals, plus he gets to eat steak every week, and he ain't gotta go to work anywhere, while being safe from bankruptcy. So as long as the welfare checks keep coming, you'll have black people bitching that equal protection under the law means equal access to jobs, and no discrimination, but as long as they have an easier time on welfare with their many kids than actually doing the minimum wage work, they'll find excuses like unfairly tight cycle times they want relaxed when running an injection molding machine, so they can enjoy themselves more comfortably at their job, and they quit over it and go back on welfare, and 100,000 of them stay put and peaceful in the inner city 20 minutes away from the job while from localities of 100 or 1000 from hours away in the empty back country side you have white people come do the work, bust ass at it for very little money, and not get their teeth fixed. But black people have a point, if I had to do the same job in a factory full of black people with the same cycle time requirements, I would have not been able to most likely. It is what it is. That's what ownership of a block means, nigga dyin over a block he don't even own, he's renting. He's renting for now, til he gets his votes across at the county government. Because of the county government attacking my property so hard and attacking me financially so hard, I refuse to accept any job inside the county, for the very purpose of not paying taxes to the county. They already took plenty of taxes and caused enough destruction for me that I don't feel like I owe anything to them with a clear conscience. And the federal government should regulate all utilities, especially energy companies that rake in the biggest profits in the history of mankind, into less monopolistic or oligopolistic abusive behavior. There should be no such thing as a minimum service charge from any fucking utility that is a natural monopoly, or from any monopoly for that matter. The major fight over inner city voting dominance goes down between black and Hispanic folk. Blacks are mostly Christian baptists, while Latinos are the most devout Catholics in the entire universe. Even their city names start with San or Santa, and only few English ones like St. Louis do the same. So as far as outside funding is concerned hispanics might get extra support even in places like NYC and Boston, far from the California-Arizona-New Mexico-Texas hispanic front. So I work at this cotton company that's mostly hispanic vs. blacks and there are ethnic tensions like hispanic maintenance people taking extra long to come get a downed machine going, ruining the operator's score compared to their hispanic friends, or even if their impartial, there is deep distrust along ethnic lines and extra scrutiny of accidents and mishaps, looking for intent. So who owns a job, a company? Me being white is like watching superpowers of Alien vs. Predator(I never seen that movie, heck I never even seen Matrix, other than previews) go down as a spectator between Blacks and Hispanics. And my last job I lost was also about who owns what job. It was a predominantly white job, with some blacks, but anywhere they send me to a predominantly white company, they also send the black guys along with me, to show there is racism and discrimination. And the white guys that work there may look Jewish, and they can't really decide what I am, and they say I look Saxon, as in Germanic as in Hitler they all hate, so sometimes they sing military ayohayohayohay to me and yell at me to drive that tow motor faster to hit something with it by mistake, other times they are really helpful cuz I look like one of them. They can't really decide what I am. I can't really decide what I am. I was born with blond hair, then it turned red, then it settled on brunette, while my eyes never changed away from blue so now I'm blue eyed brown haired. All babies are born with blue eyes and all the people with brown eyes metamorphosed into that color sometime in their youth. I'm a mix, I look around my relatives, and most look totally different from each other, but some, like my mother and one of my aunts, look identical even with many years difference between them, and my girl cousin looks totally different from the two, from her mother, but she's the only exact look alike of my maternal grandmother at age 5. So anyway, people who are white and Jewish sometimes look at me and they think of Germans and Hitler, so they try to set me up with a black guy to train, to show how racist I am. Dude, I'm not racist, I'll teach this black guy how to run this machine better than you or I know it, and when he observes, overhears what I say and how I teach, he gets extremely pissed because he does not want to lose his job to this black guy doing his job better than he can. Yeah, don't fuck with me like that, try to set me up, throw a grenade with the pin pulled at me cuz I'll throw it right back at you along the same line of who is racist now? Everybody. Everybody wants to protect their job, including along racial lines. They can give me a job as a white guy, have me hang around, because I don't bring anyone along, but if they let a black guy or many black guys into the place, he'll bring his cousins and his crew and soon he's gonna tell you "this is already ours", we own this block now too, you gotta go. Suburban or back country white folk have been through that experience of having to move on too many times, and it all lives vividly in their imagination. It starts along the lines of you having to let one black family move into the neighborhood like Detroit, and if you don't, you're a racist and you discriminate and that's illegal. Next he has cookouts and parties where all 150 of his first cousins show up (how can you possibly have enough money to support and raise 150 cousins unless on welfare under prevailing wages and housing costs, and they are like dude, my women are too hot and I can't help it), then his cousins start moving into the neighborhood, and once a critical mass is gained, like hyenas vs. lionesses of 3 vs. 1, it's time for open expulsion. It becomes a place where they let the few hundred black kids into the open street with mini bicycles get really loud, or sometimes put the speaker in the window and the door Rod Stuart style and play black music, or most often just litter the neighborhood into a walking around knee deep in the trash scene. (A black guy I took on a road trip getting drinking water from a mountain fountain's biggest impression while driving through the back country was how poorly white folk live in cramped up mobile home parks without basements, but also how clean they keep their surroundings regardless. And that made him appreciate his inner city ghetto houses with huge basements. I tried joking with him that this is all KKK land, and we're not really going for water, but actually to an annual KKK reunion, and we need a black guy to celebrate. He did not find it funny at all. But he still liked the sight seeing, including the Life is Good signs.) So if filling the neighborhood up with a scattered trash assault don't work, and white people are not racist enough, you can tell them that this block is ours now. When I go with the same black guy from the KKK reunion trip into a bar where he's playing pool on a $10 bet where he breaks, and finishes in one run without the other guys ever taking a single shot ever (that's what you call fair betting huh? they don't even get a chance), so when I wander into the bathroom I get told "is you lost white boy?" As in this is obviously a black bar and we know you ain't fuckin our women with your don't want don't want no eenie weenie teenie weenie shriveled little short dick man you need to put yo clothes back on honey dick you're pissing with right now. So they take over bars, neighborhoods and jobs along ethnic lines. And the inner city government is openly attacking me because I don't look either black or Jewish enough, or Hispanic, it's like I'm caught up in the middle of these alien vs. predator fights, as a squirrel trying to get a nut, often getting too much attention when they should all just worry about their own business. I should have been able to buy a junk house for peanuts, and the housing market still go on ding dong merrily on high, but they set me up and used me, and I ended up in a pure black neighborhood with white doctors and nurses walking into a parking lot right across me. Initially I wanted to go into a war ravaged ethnic area where the blacks are presently taking over territory from whites, and there are a few people killed and shot every few months, but because of that housing cost was pretty low, with lots of abandoned junk houses needing rehab, and as long as you don't get yourself killed by phosphorescing too white in the dark, you got a chance of making it economically, as opposed to sure demise economically while having to pay rent in the better neighborhood. It's like I wanted to take a chance of being able to save up lots of money that allows me to honestly have a child later, as opposed to sure extinction without children while forced to paying rent, because while I pay rent I'm always under the danger of being out on the street, nowhere to go, and even the Walmart parking lot has cameras and signs up that you cannot be there and sleep in your car like you used to, so where can you go if not to the nearest national forests where there is public land and it's nobody's private property, and claim that you're wildlife too, a cavemen, so they should not carry your ass out of there in a straitjacket. It's like I can go on a 3 week hunger strikes and protests incursions on liberty, practice civil disobedience and live in misery, but under such constant threat of not owning the roof over my head even if it's a simple tent, or the ground under my feet, I cannot honestly assume the responsibility of a child. Like you can say I'm not gonna eat anything for 3 weeks, and sleep under a bridge, and you might even find an adult woman consenting to that, or even consenting to suicide by starvation, but a 5 year old child, even if he consents, it's not a valid consent. You cannot have a child consent to a hunger strike, whether it's his idea or the parent's or both in 100% full agreement. Having a child is responsibility, and only irresponsible, guilty individuals proliferate in voting power in today's welfare economy, which is why it's obvious why it won't last long, including possible secessions along the California fault lines. For me, basic security, such as not being kicked out of your home at the whim of some landlord, or not being able to come up with housing cost which even today is by far the hugest cost on my list of expenses, is lacking. And no I ain't gonna fucking flip a few hundred dollar housing cost into an over thousand dollar Obamacare expense, bullshit. They are like it looks like we can't take your money over housing, so we're gonna give that up, you can win that fight and live for $10/mo housing cost, but we need $900/mo health insurance, out of which 600 goes into our pocket as profit, and if you don't pay it we can give you cancerous infections or heart attacks or even worm inside your head lobotomies with a gamma knife or x-ray knife from right across your driveway when you're sleeping. You better pay up. Fuck you maffiozos. So I wanted to move into this slavic ethnic vs. black war zone and get a chance at life, at having children through financial freedoms of low housing cost, where I would have had a brick wall basement and a neighbor really far on one side, so if I sleep in the x-ray shade on one side, the other one is too far to shoot me from there while I sleep. That would have been much preferable compared to the tiny ass cast iron tub on a top floor I'm forced to sleep in, to not wake up, these days with pain hit in the spine bones in the groin area right around my prostate, instead of trying to put holes in my head, remotely. Yeah a fucking ethnic war zone between slavs and blacks with a good x-ray proof basement and $600/year property tax which comes to $50/mo housing cost, plus you can throw a fucking blue tarp over a brick smashed window without the city sending you citations is much preferable compared to how I live because I could have pumped up my bank account on it, as opposed to sure death and old age the way I live now. All I know is I cannot move into a pure black neighborhood black people already conquered in 1977 riots or whenever that shit went down, but I might have had a chance in a war zone where looking white is not too out of place, and among the white people they pick off the ones that are most racists, or offensive. Even black people have a heart and they won't kill you unless you openly offend them. Like they find the ugliest ones amongst themselves, that they themselves find ugly, and send it on you, to say Hi. And you treat them like anyone else, and that's surprising, They try to wind themselves up against you by sending their young girls that look very different at you, but they are their sisters and cousins. And you call them beautiful, then they demand you fuck them, to prove that they are beautiful, and you're like dude, I'm not even fucking my mindblowingly hot white women, because I cannot afford to take on the responsibility of kids with them, so you need to leave me alone with that. But anyway, there is a chance to make it in such an environment and I did not get that chance. It's like it's my job to figure out on how to make it on minimum wage, and the reasonable options on that is inner city housing or living in the sticks. My first choice by far was living in inner city with public transportation, but I scare the black 10 year old school boys when they get on the bus and freeze in their tracks like they see a ghost when they haven't seen a white person in their entire life on that bus. And I wanted to move to the sticks, or more like a place where I can get out in deep snow without a gas inefficient plow truck because the road in front of the lot is pummeled by freight trucks, but it's too expensive to get out there, moreover they don't want me to bring the black folk with me, because anywhere I go they send the black guys along just to prove there is discrimination, and if there isn't, that's good, then they come along to take over yet another white territory. And white people understand this and they don't want me in their sticks either. So where the fuck can I go and live there owning my own roof. I sure don't want to live where I live now owning the roof, because the property tax is so friggin high. I got no business on minimum wage in the near suburbs, it's either inner city or far out suburbs of sticks, it's got to be in a place where putting a blue tarp on the window after it's smashed with a brick is acceptable to the neighbors. And black people want to use to me figure it out how to take over the inner wealthy suburbs on minimum wage, show them the way. Dude it's not fucking possible, and even if it were, I got no interest in showing you how to drive my aunt out of her house. You can already do it by working at a hospital, or the transit system, yeah, it's not minimum wage, and it's not possible on minimum wage, minimum wage is supposed to guarantee you a living in the inner city, not in the richest of richest suburbs. And in that minimum wage cannot cover brick smashed window cost on a weekly basis, but it can cover blue tarp over it. If you got brick smashing problems, that's your fucking fault. You're creating an ethnic war zone. I'm not slavic or german in my mothertongue, and there was an area of my ethnicity back in the 80's, that has been uprooted and driven out by black invaders, it's like Da Man who's mostly Jewish uses blacks who call each other Agatha, then tell me dude, don't fucking call her that, I'm like why not? He's like don't you know Agatha is a witch and we call her that cuz she's so ugly? How would I fucking know Agatha is a witch? I wasn't born and raised here. And Da Man tells these black guys it's because my people turned their back on God. And these black guys know that's total bullshit, all they have to do is take me to the abandoned protestant church up on the hill, and they can see what kinds of building my people that supposedly turned their back on God built to the Jewish God. But in any case, at my last job, Jewish looking white people set me up against black people who are like a grenade with the pin pulled, and I throw it right back at them. They successfully used them in my ethnicities area to drive out white people, partly because white women are addicted to big cocks, but it's a grenade with a pin pulled that can blow up in their own face too, like black guys fucking their daughters too, who can't say no to big dick. It's like even in the Bible Exodus from Egypt happened because the Jewish women could not resist sucking on the Egyptian dark dick that was big like a horses dong.

Here, I came back and tracked this part down: Ezekiel 23:20
"She lusted after lovers with genitals as large as a donkey's and emissions like those of a horse."
or
"Yet she multiplied her harlotries, remembering the days of her youth, when she played the harlot in the land of Egypt. 20"She lusted after their paramours, whose flesh is like the flesh of donkeys and whose issue is like the issue of horses. 21"Thus you longed for the lewdness of your youth, when the Egyptians handled your bosom because of the breasts of your youth." The Adultery of Oholah and Aholibah. (When was all this? 5000 years ago? 4000? We're still on it, but these days the promised real estate farm land to run away to is on a rotation cylinder space station.)

You throw that big black cock grenade with the pin pulled at me and my women and I throw it right back at you and our women and watch it blow up in your face instead. And it's guaranteed to create economic misery and devastation, because not only is it irresistible to your women or any women including black ones, it also does not know how to exercise self control and say no to pussy, and it will create overpopulation issues and because of that economic devastation issues among you. Yes, having too many children when you cannot afford them is the single most economically devastating thing in the world. Children are the single most expensive item on any budget, and you cannot afford to take care of them when you can barely take care of yourself, without government help, which is temporary for a few decades by the way, eventually the free money falling from the sky and the government piling on more and more debt, guaranteeing everyone and their dozen kids equal protection in the eyes of law with equal right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, to where they quit $14/hr battery replacing jobs in a hospital for it, will cease.

It may cease with this start of seceding from the Union and federal tax burden imposed by being part of that union, most of the tax burden of course going into the social security and welfare system, including unemployment checks, even the military budget is dwarfed by it. It may start along Hispanic lines, where even the Aztec little dick may out fuck the big black cock in voting power and population dominance, especially in the San and Santa southwestern US areas, even fueled by external help by world powers, such as the Catholic Church. I'm Catholic btw, but I can see there are two sides to it too, including burning of Giordano Bruno and forcing Galileo to retract his scientific opinion by the Catholic powers, and forced confessions of sins and such other things as issues with abuse of power by the church. But overall the church is more beneficial than not having it in the first place, by far, by far.

All I can say that We The People can only guaranteed equal protection under the law to all people regardless of race, ethnicity, hair color or lack thereof, religion, etc, if the United States stays united. The Constitution and Bill of Rights with the 1st Amendment, 2nd Amendment, etc, only stands while the Union stands, and those amendments are under severe attack by Da Man as it is, and he may opt to divide and conquer instead, and the breakup of the US, starting with economic breakup of a bankrupt government going out of existence, may be initiated more at the top, than the back country hill billy wanting to overthrow the government gun right activists of KY, TX, MT, WV, etc, who also want to secede from the Union. Then without the 2nd amendment you're a sitting duck, because it is the 2nd amendment that guarantees you the pen is mightier than the sword 1st amendment, when push comes to shove, the motherfucking trigger is Da Man, and whoever got it, is Da Man, and when they take it away from We The People, who we're still Da Man in theory, that's when forced home audits are gonna happen, Da Man coming into your homes carrying off your food like it was done by the jewish commies to the Ukrainians in the 30s, or to my mother and her siblings in the 50's, where they lived on orange pumpkin that was grown as feed for the pigs not for humans, and mulberry berries growing on trees around the house. I've said back in Sept that the powers that be put Hitler there in a tit for tat way, and all we ever hear is 6 million jews gassed in WW2, but we never hear about the 7 million Ukrainian kulaks starved slowly a decade before. Schindler's list movies and all that, seems to me you still owe a million dead jews to make it even, unless jews are worth more than Ukrainians, for instance, because they are special, they are the chosen people of God, while the Ukrainians are not. So if a jew is worth 2 Ukrainians, then 6 million dead jews equal 12 million dead Ukrainians, not 7, so there is a need for 5 million dead Ukrainians to satisfy the balance debt. Just how much more a chosen person is worth compared to a gentile? Or compared to an Egyptian stranger? We already had an accounting scheme where, in the days of slavery, for voting and government representation considerations each black slave was counted being worth 2/3, or 66% the value of an average white person. So you have it at 0.66 for a black enslaved person. 1.00 for an average white person of European descent during slavery, and it must be 7/6th or 1.16 for one of the chosen people of God during the 1930's, if how things went down historically is to be called even. All I know is people are not like horses, who willingly accept a master slave relationship, and cooperate willingly like that, and a royalty/nobility/yeomanry/indentured servant/slave class based society, even if much more economically efficient, does not last long because of constant internal strife. Even when born into slavery, raised in slavery, all he ever knew was slavery, a black person different even in physical appearance in skin color from a white slave master could never internally accept the internal condition of inequality, in his mind he was equal to any person in the world in worth, not more, not less. Here is the poem Invictus by William Ernest Henley that Timothy McVeigh recited at his execution:

Out of the night that covers me,
  Black as the pit from pole to pole,
  I thank whatever gods may be
  For my unconquerable soul.

  In the fell clutch of circumstance
  I have not winced nor cried aloud.
  Under the bludgeonings of chance
  My head is bloody, but unbowed.

  Beyond this place of wrath and tears
  Looms but the Horror of the shade,
  And yet the menace of the years
  Finds and shall find me unafraid.

  It matters not how strait the gate,
  How charged with punishments the scroll,
  I am the master of my fate,
  I am the captain of my soul.

People are not horses. Once you pass a certain threshhold of intellect, while it is possible to break the psyche and mess it up, this is what the human psyche, black or white, thinks like. I thank whatever gods may be for my unconquerable soul. As in give me liberty or give me death. You can temporarily keep me down with a gun held to my skull, and sign documents, or retract my opinions publicly, like Galileo had to, but internally a human spirit is free, and always considers himself equal (or at least equal, some people consider themselves worth more than some other lowlife, but nobody internally considers themselves truly worth less than others) to anyone else, if not even in skill, in rights. Which is why there was constant need to erect runaway fugitive slave laws, while you can let your dog or cat or even horse or cow freely roam around in a village, and always come back to you, and willing to pull your cart for you, as subordinate slaves, without demanding equality.

Sometimes my jews hate me more than my niggas, and they be runnin off to New Zealand abandoning ship in the US when the big black cock grenade thrown at other Europeans they hate has gotten out of hand and blown up in their face fucking all their daughters too. I tell them where to really run, into outer space onto a space station, where only niggas with skills can chase you down, and then you don't really mind those fucking your daughters, right? But in the meantime you can hide behind the Moon with no problem, nobody can see you with a telescope from down here, unless they are Chinese who take a trip once in a blue Moon around the other side of the Moon too. In the meantime I might be safer among blacks who may x-ray the shit out of me under orders from Da Man, sometimes they hate doing it, sometimes they love doing it, but because I look different, they take extra care in how they behave with me, as opposed to if I looked like one of them, when it's no big deal. As racial riot issues presently going down in the US shows, it's a bigger deal when a white policeman shoots a black one, or calls them nigga, or a black police officer shoots a white guy, or calls him dago, hunky, nazi, klansman, etc, as opposed to each doing it to their own kind. For instance a nigga calling niggas niggas is acceptable socially as the above youtube video with Eddie Griffin shows, but if I do it, or simply quote him, with a phosphorecing in the dark white skin and blue eyes, that can get me killed. Which is why I use a pseudonym on here. I still gamble every day when I step outside that I'm not gonna be struck by lightning or shot by a sniper, all life is a gamble, which goes out to those who have a problem with Wall Street being the biggest Las Vegas in the world. Even Harry buying a machine to make plastic car parts is gambling, hoping for the future. Hoping that he can sell the parts to a car manufacturer hoping he can sell the cars to car dealers hoping customers walk in from the street and want to buy the cars in the end. It's not guaranteed, it's a hope, it's a gamble, and positive expectations for the future, but still a gamble. A gamble also like a meteorite fireball won't crash into his building, against which of course he can buy insurance if he wants to, gamble on the gamble and then try to chase the insurance company down when it's out of business, or simply files for bankruptcy in face of a claim that he submits to them. All bank deposits are gambled on, banks hold 10 million out of 100 million on hand as cash, gambling that there will not be a bank run asking for all deposits back all at the same time, if anything, having a 5 yr certificate of deposit to extend to 30 year from, or 2 day bank transaction processing delay period giving them a constant supply of money on hand to extend to 30 years from, and gamble like that, is used. But otherwise your bank account funds available summaries are just mere certificates of gold, or index stocks on housing, because there is no 100 million in cash at the bank to live up to all certificate values, because that's out on loan for a mortgage and only returned in 30 years with interest, just like there is not enough gold to cover all gold certificates and not enough mortgages to cover all housing market investment intent gambling derivatives. Gentlemen and professional gamblers know how to walk out of a casino and not be sore losers, unlike all these mofos constantly attacking me, trying to blame me for their losses in the housing gambling business. You can all go fuck yourselves and stop being such a sore loser. Wall Street took all your money and ran with it laughing cuz you're all idiots and don't know how to gamble properly either in Vegas or Wall Street. For one he house always wins. Guaranteed. And no you were not forced to gamble in the casinos called NASDAQ and NYSE, but you did that out of your own choosing. For now at least, until the last not yet elected Bush, Jeb, from Florida, and his punks force you to put your retirement money into that gamble like Obama forces you to put all your money into health insurance gambles, by first paying for it all himself from your taxes, just to establish status quo, then forcing you to do it. Bullshit. If anything, I got no problem with tax rebates, like if I paint my car green, and put in big letters on it "environmentally friendly" then the government will let me have a tax discount, a deduction from my taxes. But don't call it a penalty to other people if they don't do it. What's in a name, says Shakespeare, a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet. Well Obamacare named a tax rebate as opposed to a tax penalty would smell much better. As in, let's say the taxes are $1000, and if I don't buy health insurance, you give me a penalty of $100, so the total is $1100, instead you can make the taxes be $1100, and give a deductible "discount" or "rebate" like you already do to mortgage interest (which is also bs, and causes the housing bubble), renewable energy, etc. That way old people who badly need insurance can buy it with the government paying for it if they request it, and young people in their 20's, who the insurance companies are really after, can stay happily uninsured, if they want to, or just people who don't want to drain the government funds with welfare like health insurance support, or welfare like welfare checks, but they consider it a shame or failure to be on welfare, and know it's not long term sustainable on a country scale, they can stay the way they are, away from government aid, or forced spending of their money or arbitrarily high health insurance. Of course no tax in the world can come to 900/mo that health insurance will most likely want for a family of 4 on a $8/hr minimum wage that comes to 160hrs/mo x 8/hr =1280/mo gross before taxes. Also, for instance the Amish don't even have to pay social security tax, because they take care of their own elderly. And they better not have to buy health insurance then either, right? Then everybody is like, let's take me, personally, to the Amish. Let's not, because the big black cock wants to come along with me, and fuck every one of their girls without taking responsibility for raising the children, like so many white women who have black kids I know, and women cannot say no to dick, because they don't have time and patience to wait, because with every second that passes they lose their youth. Even 50 year old japanese men like Taro Aso prefer looking at anime, hentain, teenagers than 20 or 30 or 60 year old women. Why? First of all a 60 year old woman is not fertile, she is post menopausal, she can get you off but you're wasting your sperm. And men are sexually attracted to a human female, as opposed to a boulder or a piece of rock, or a downed tree log with a hole on it, or even a sheep with a warm and tight moist hole, because human females are able to bear children for them. That's the ultimate purpose of sex after all. And in that a girl who is 16 or 18 has a much smaller chance of being insanely hot, healthy, smart, nothing wrong with her, and without preexisting children, than someone who's say 30. If she's 30, and has no kids, you ask, well, what's wrong? Sometimes it's simply the circumstances, (or often, especially in the insane housing cost of NYC a whole lot of women reach 40 before they are financially ready to take on children, without anything ever being wrong with them other than constantly broke), but oftentimes she's not that hot, or she got issues, or who knows what, but most females at age 30 are both hot and have preexisting kids already. Then comes up the topic of hooking up with single mothers. Even I had the chance for that. But that's a huge mess you're getting yourself into. If she's a widow, that's one thing, but most likely you are gonna have a gal with child who's father visits every Saturday, and they stand next to each other talking in your kitchen, and he's groping your woman's ass. And when you go over there and interrupt, they both look at you like why are you intruding on their relationship, when the two of them have a daughter together, and all you got with her is a ring on her finger and no kids. I'd be like dude she said you already had another girlfriend and dumped her, and she has a marriage vow with me, and he's like but I was here first, inside this booty, and I got the daughter with her, and now she changed her mind. She can change her mind any time, but the existence of the child cannot be flipped on a whim like that, now I see you, now I close my eyes and wish I never had you, and when I open it you disappeared. What kind of mother would that be? Also, being first means something, which is why most asian women look like underage teenagers even when they are in their 50's, and maybe that's why they are short in stature too, as in a lot of women with growth hormone issues look like they are 16 even at age 50, they still look like some teenager who has no kids yet, and none of the bullshit that comes with it with another guy in your kitchen groping your wife's ass with full rights, and you being considered an intruder on their relationship. Even if you have kids with her, and he never visits, it's unfair to that child. My mother was told she should have stayed with my father, she said she did not want to die, my aunt who looks like a copy of her said to her you said til death do us apart to him, and if you die we bury you. My mother said she does not want to die, even if she's a devout catholic, she lived separately from him. And he denied I was his child, there was a constant guessing game every time my hair turned colors who the father might be, even the catholic priest claiming fathership over me, but by age 5 or so I started looking like my father, and then he filed for divorce, to get her into court to be able to openly address her, chastising how my mother is feeding me, why I'm so skinny, when at age 5 I was almost "forcefed" so much (or more like really ushered and constantly nudged to eat), that I hated to eat, especially cabbage soup, boiled egg soup, and really nasty tasting meat with tendons I was unable to chew and either had to swallow as ball or spit out. I never really liked meat, and I'll eat it, especially here it all tastes good, but even in my youth I kept fishing around the meat and ate the other food instead. I guess she did that cuz I looked too much like my father, but when I asked her why I can't have little brothers like all my other friends, she said because she did not want to marry another man and have children with him, who would care more about his kids, and neglect me. She never fully agreed to the divorce, internally, she showed up in court, but in her mind, as a devout Catholic who always prays the rosary, what God tied together in marriage a human judge cannot dissolve apart. And these complications are why the Catholic church does not mess around with divorce. Most divorce happens around sexual boredom. I'm proud of my cousin who went with a really hot girl for like 4 months without sex when they hooked up, even though she had like 7 boyfriends before him, all failed relationships, and you later find out she is really addicted to sucking dick, from my cousins's brother, but they went for many months totally in love with each other it seemed like from the way they looked at each other, trying to find something else than sex to base their relationship on. When from the bride not only the vagina, the bootay part is needed, but there is more to her. (Which is what Steve Harvey keeps yapping at the young gangsta rapping niggas so full of themselves about. How about a song about a woman that you love, not just about their bootay or a song about yourself?) And they've been together forever, like all my other relatives, my mother being the only one who ever divorced in the extended family, and her too was forced to divorce in a way that was not really her decision, and she did not remarry. And there are countless examples of such people, like the Clintons, or even Bushes, or Obamas, unlike what's in vogue in Hollywood or in the urban ghettos. Single mothers, white or black, with a ton of black babies and all that. No I don't want to bring black with big dicks people into the Amish communities. Women don't have time to waste with every second their youth passing them by, and if any financially responsible dick approaches them, that is an opportunity they cannot reject. Unfortunately big black dicks are not financially responsible, you're not gonna find a black guy with a big black dick who got no kids, and if you can, he's ancient history very fast, because his peers overpopulate him and drive him to extinction in no time. While free welfare money falls from to sky to ensure equal protection, equal rights to life liberty and pursuit of happiness to all citizens born out of wedlock. Something is gonna give. It may even go along with a breakup of the Union, along language lines, conquering of territory not via weapons, but welfare babies and population voting power.

Oh btw, my jews hate me because I dig my heel in on intellectual property issues and bullshit insurance issues, usually against their benefit. So I might be safer hiding out among my niggas who take extra care with me like black police men take extra care in slinging racial slurs like dago at white people, compared to white people doing it to themselves. All I can say to my jews do onto others as thou would have them do unto thee. Force insurance unto black people as you would have them force insurance onto your family, and profit unfairly for it. And don't think it will never happen. Justice is supposed to be universal. (Even if that's the very first things they teach to cocksucking lawyers in law school as not being correct.)