in fact the tahoe lafs idea (erasure coding, you need e.g. any 3 chunks of the 6 floating around to reconstruct your file) is better suited because you are not hosting the whole document, and you can't even brute force decrypt a single chunk to obtain a part of the document either

All consecration is standalone? or where does it originate from? Holy spirit, which is one with the Father and the "I am the way" Son.
As for the eternal value of the consecration, it's likely that some baptized guy does not receive salvation, no matter how high you value that consecration.

War declarations were useful things.

Baptism, "the way to enter the club"? I guess it was J. "I am the way" Christ.
Baptism is more like the club's bumper sticker.

Wait, all ducks in the world actually speak Engl... sorry I meant all English speaking people in the world actually speak like ducks.

Close, but no cigar.
Hint: Apple Computer Inc. got founded April 1, 1976.

The OT poses a problem only if you insist that a father that educated a toddler shouting NO! should keep educating a grownup by doing exactly the same. Or if you insist that books written about the hypothetical WHO beyond creation should spend time detailing HOW things got formed, possibly matching the way scientists describe the universe from the inside of it (which currently can't explain 95% of stuff without introducing dark matter/energy, multiverse, bubbles where anomalies are occurring...)

For some of believers, these are not problems, the books describe a relationship man/hypothetical God. Maybe you wanted the Sutra instead?

I am saying exactly that. As in a vegetarian who is eating meat is not a vegetarian. Maybe he reverts to a veg diet later, ok.

Matthew 19:8, apply as principle, the Bible is not a ruleset, things change.

"Sola fide" is a reaction to the Catholic, not so disinterested, accent on acts of salvation. Personally I'd let an all seing all powerful and just entity decide for itself whom is to consider a follower.

The concept of capital sin, and for the Bible only fans, Matthew 25, are a bit more demanding than your syllogism about sin. Now if you argue that some Christians do not obtain salvation I could agree but then we have reached absurdity.

There is no logic in definitions. These passages seem pretty clear:
Matthew 7:21-23
Matthew 21,28-32

>Kill them all, let God sort them out.
Cool, it's an instance of lazy execution in the context of "lazy" executions. Your move, atheists.

Seriously, you cannot kill as a Christian, because 1. you can't kill 2. being Christian is defined by your actions, not your label. So you might wear a tiara, it does not matter.

This killing is permitted by Islam? There is a relatively short book that underwent much less aggressive editing than the bible, which can answer that question, personally I don't know.

MS is the new IBM, while android is the new windows.
Source: I own an android phone.

If you follow the literal contents of the books you end up with the 10 commandments and good luck imitating God's killings without being God (a capital sin justified with a sin? sorry, it's downstairs for you).

If you follow the literal contents you also assert you understand them 100% which is quite a feat, but never mind that.

If somebody wrote books like those today, he'd find himself in the same position as the Mohammed guy, where his assertions would either be questioned or used, if fitting some powerful interest's agenda.

So if you blame Mohammed instead of those interests, you make a great favor to those interests because they can change their ideology as easily as you can buy a pair of shoes.