Comment Re:Doesn't this violate TOS? (Score 1) 184
I have a cunning plan, my lord.
- The guest doesn't get open internet access.
- The wifi provider opens up a secure tunnel with a server designated, or owned by the guest. The ISP is foiled.
- The guest connect to it and sets up a secure tunnel itself, through which he accesses the internet. The wifi provider is foiled as it cannot snoop on it and cannot be considered responsible by what the guest does, morally. Legally it's another matter, but then, the law is immoral. Also if the guest misbehaves the investigators will find the server designated/owned by the guest first, which is probably the right place to investigate if you want to find the real source.