Comment Re:Online ruled out? (Score 1) 680
I like to have backups online -- I have them on a couple of services. Since they are just backups, I find it convenient to encrypt all files before uploading (gnupg style).
Comment Let's get real (Score 2, Insightful) 527
Sorry to hear about your situation, but you must be certain that death is an inevitable part of life. It is certainly sad that some people may go away earlier than expected, and we have this notion that a person may somewhat "live a while longer" as we keep their memories alive with us. After a loved one dies, mourning certainly is an important period to help us get over this fact.
No matter how many pictures, videos or journals you make of a person while he/she is alive, nothing will replace the fact that this person is really gone. Fading memories are part of an essential process where we leave them behind and move on with our lives. We will certainly remember and honor our loved ones at their best and most marking moments. But holding on to so many specific details about their lives takes an incredible unnatural effort. The longer we try, the more difficult it becomes to remember specific details. And this is natural! The more we strongly hold on to a person after he/she is gone, the more difficult it will become to keep living.
Please, don't understand me wrong. Unfortunately, that's how life goes on. It's hard, but inevitable.
I hope you make the best or your time together. And my suggestion is "stop trying to record every detail of her life and spent more time with her as a family". Your own memories of this time together should be well enough to help you get over the hard period when she's gone. In the future, when you look back, anything else will just make you seem like "the guy behind the camera".
Comment Re:Do Microsoft products use .NET? (Score 1) 443
Some large coprs have already used .NET to create solutions and integreate with MS products. So... legacy's already settled.
Behind the 4GB Memory Limit In 32-Bit Windows 756
An anonymous reader points us to a very detailed post by Geoff Chappell, first put up early this year, explaining how the 4GB memory limit commonly bandied about for 32-bit Windows (he is writing mainly about Vista) is more of a licensing preference than an architectural limit. The article outlines how Chappell unlocked his system to use all the memory that is present, but cautions that such hackery is ill-advised for several reasons, including legal ones. "If you want [to be able to use more than 4GB in Vista] without contrivance, then pester Microsoft for an upgrade of the license data or at least for a credible, detailed reasoning of its policy for licensing your use of your computer's memory. ... [C]onsider Windows Server 2008. For the loader and kernel in Windows Vista SP1 (and, by the way, for the overwhelming majority of all executables), the corresponding executable in Windows Server 2008 is exactly the same, byte for byte. Yet Microsoft sells 32-bit Windows Server 2008 for use with as much as 64GB of memory. Does Microsoft really mean to say that when it re-badges these same executables as Windows Vista SP1, they suddenly acquire an architectural limit of 4GB? Or is it that a driver for Windows Server 2008 is safe for using with memory above 4GB as long as you don't let it interact with the identical executables from Windows Vista SP1?"
IE Should Use Google's Malware List 109
Frequent contributor Bennett Haselton writes with an idea that he thinks could help keep browsing on Microsoft's browser more secure for users — and benefit Microsoft as a result. "Tests show that IE's malware filter performs well against other browsers that use the Safe Browsing blacklist from Google. But wouldn't IE's filter be even more effective if it used both filter lists at the same time? And are the political obstacles to that really so insurmountable?" Read on for the rest of a plan that seems a lot more than half-baked.
