Comment Re:It is a Hobby (Score 1) 218
Believe it or not in a conversation people do not repeat the same point over and over again.
Believe it or not, when your initial argument is bullshit, it doesn't change the facts...
Believe it or not in a conversation people do not repeat the same point over and over again.
Believe it or not, when your initial argument is bullshit, it doesn't change the facts...
Depends in what sense you use the word.
No, not to the IRS, and that was the original question.
When you have billions of dollars your versions of "hobby" may be very different from what a normal person would do.
Maybe so, but going back to original post about what the IRS considers a "hobby", a "non-profit" is not the same as a business that makes no money.
According the IRS if you run a business and don't make a profit, it is considered a HOBBY.
Sort of like Bill Gates' non-profit is a "hobby"?
Hopefully in a journal that is reviewed by skeptics rather than Ideologues.
All scientific journals are reviewed by skeptics.
That's because all scientists are skeptics.
Spoken like a true ideologue.
OK guys. We've promoted Open Source for decades. We have to own up to our own problems.
This was a failure in the Open Source process. It is just as likely to happen to closed source software, and more likely to go unrevealed if it does, which is why we aren't already having our heads handed to us.
But we need to look at whether Open Source projects should be providing the world's security without any significant funding to do so.
See, the problem with your example is that understanding a particular tech (i.e. Java, C#) != logical thinking. A lot of people are great at understanding how to integrate Spring and Hibernate and muck around with configurations, but suck at logical thinking. A lot of people are great at logical thinking and problem solving, but for the life of them can't (or won't) bother themselves with APIs and the like.
Hire someone who's studying "real" CS (i.e. lots of discrete math, graph theory, data structures etc), engineering, or the hard sciences (math, physics, chemistry etc) and you'll see that unless they studied at no-name college, they can easily solve logical problems.
On some level, I can't help but think that the article you linked to is full of shit. Or at the very least, a hyperbole.
Computer Science grads and PhDs cannot do basic loops and recursion? Yeah right. Unless they studied at University of Phoenix or DeVry, any school worth its salt will teach you math and computational logic for comp sci degrees.
Is it true for someone who's studied, say, literature, and wants to program? I can see that happening. But the legitimacy of the whole piece is affected when they make blanket statements that the majority of the comp sci grads can't or that people with master's and PhDs in comp sci cannot solve simple problems.
There's no data there other than anecdotes, and I'll dismiss it for the hyperblow that it probably is.
I chose $10 - $20 in apps, because it really depends on whether or not a new app captures my attention.
However, I spend much more than that on music and media. Like a song I heard on the radio? Shazam it and buy it. Does someone just remind you of a favorite album from your childhood? Buy it.
Our first baby was born just a few weeks ago, and lately, I've been buying lullabies, nursery rhymes, and similar music/apps.
Given how inexpensive apps are, I am boggled at how many people refuse to spend any money on them.
Jeff, I'm sorry that you're paying more. I'm envious that your state is implementing single-payer, though! California considers and rejects the bill every session, so far.
MVP itself is not-for-profit. Interesting that they think the pool in the two states they focus on is now that much more expensive. I can't imagine why.
Thanks
Bruce
To pick a nit, if you require medical attention after an auto accident, typically the at-fault driver's auto policy would need to cover that.
If they are so kind to stick around and your expenses do not exceed the limits.
Certainly such scams existed, but 30 seconds of googling can typically separate the good from the fraud.
The web helps. At the time, I was not able to see the plan until the salesman was present.
I've noticed several design suggestions in your code.