Comment Translation (Score 1) 281
From Google Translate: "Customer feedback" --> "Internet shitstorm"
From Google Translate: "Customer feedback" --> "Internet shitstorm"
"Neverwhere" by Neil Gaiman.
Or, "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett.
Hell, anything by Neil Gaiman.
No no no, for the love of God, no!!!
A major aspect of the show is the fact that it is small-screen. Its roots are in the campiness that the early shows had, and that occurred because of the tiny budget and fast turnaround. The effect of that can still been seen today.
The campiness and fun will be eliminated in a Hollywood blockbuster treatment, and it will turn into just another sex-and-explosions vehicle.
"Believe it", in this poll, in this context, is shorthand for "I am persuaded by the evidence to date".
Given the number of true believers here (people I equate with the deniers on the skeptic side), I am wondering how long this post, all of which is factual and can be confirmed with relative ease, will be modded "troll". Seems to happen to all posts that are in any way skeptical.
And you were modded +4 Insightful. Followup comment?
Read the book "The Limits To Growth--The 30 Year Update"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Limits_to_Growth
Many people dismiss this book; but, from the wikipedia article:
In 2008 Graham Turner at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) in Australia published a paper called "A Comparison of `The Limits to Growth` with Thirty Years of Reality".[5][6] It examined the past thirty years of reality with the predictions made in 1972 and found that changes in industrial production, food production and pollution are all in line with the book's predictions of economic and societal collapse in the 21st century.[7]
It's been a couple of years since I read the 30-year update edition, but I recall being unnerved by how accurate their predictions have been up to that point; and I see no reason to think things will change. It is not going to be pretty.
A guy fell off the Empire State Building. As he passed the 30th floor, he said to himself, "I'm okay so far!"
Almost; you'd actually be (1/sqrt(2))*married + ((1/sqrt(2))*single. But, imagine the superpositions!
I sure hope any potential employers google "Robert Soloway" and find "Spam king" high on the results list.
The only way that could happen is if a bunch of people all put the words "Robert Soloway" and "Spam king" together on a major website that Google crawls.
Doesn't seem likely...
So which is it?
Neither. She was not complaining about her employer, so it is a false comparison./p>
The closest I think you could come to it is that she was complaining about her working conditions. Not the same thing.
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn