Anyone answering a question of this nature online is being foolish. AC, moniker or not.

IRS tax policy has nothing to do with computer usefulness. It's office equipment, not simply PCs.

Oh please. His point was simply to snark.

Do you have any teeth left at all after your knee impacted your chin?

Might be true if that was how it worked. Even with keyboard control, you get three dimensional movement and a mouse gives analogue. What is this 4th dimension you can control, time? Not in a multi-player game unless you're talking about clipping, which isn't really control so much as an approved cheat on output timing.

I only use the keyboard for macro level actions like popping an inventory or map. Otherwise I use a customizable controller and customizable, multi-button mouse in tandem and I will guarantee that I can maneuver in 3D as well as you.

On the lighter side, auto-lock is for pussies.

Academia is business as well, therefore....

There's a big damned difference between predicting that there might or will be a bombing and naming an individual culprit.

Posting AC isn't *the* answer, only a part. Here on /. we frequently see ACs post with an appeal to authority, claiming national publication, having designed some new, cool and super-advanced kernel, etc. Those would need to be filtered out as well. I myself have referenced some personal project. Those too. Even the language used would have to be examined to remove certain subtext.

Unreadable? How sad you have a comprehensive system so primitive.

Same intolerant crap.

It was a joke, not a serious comment.

Allow me to substitute some words. Having technical skills doesn't necessarily mean that someone is smart, especially when it comes naturally to them. Someone without natural technical skills and are able to apply their intellect to gain them are very intelligent, however. But a lot of technicians out there don't have to think about it much. - And yes, it's nice. In both venues.

"I think you are confusing wisdom for intelligence." An artificial separation.

It is a theory only in terms of parlor conversation, in terms of Theory or hypothesis, not so much. In terms of reality, no support whatsoever.

From Wiki, "fluctuation (or quantum fluctuation or vacuum fluctuation) is the temporary change in the amount of energy in a point in space,[1] as explained in Werner Heisenberg's uncertainty principle."

You'll note that change is time, and energy and space are explicitly mentioned.