Comment Re:Why ban? (Score 1) 204
Your last suggestion makes a lot of sense. Then the botters can brag about besting other botters. Of course, a lot of them are in it explicitly to harsh someone else's game. But, screw them.
Your last suggestion makes a lot of sense. Then the botters can brag about besting other botters. Of course, a lot of them are in it explicitly to harsh someone else's game. But, screw them.
Many little snowflakes nowadays make the accusation that they've been "coerced" once they make a bad decision that is freely theirs to make.
coerce: persuade (an unwilling person) to do something by using force or threats.
I do believe you're calling it coercion because you fell for their clever manipulations and encouragements that enticed you to open your wallet and freely draw out your reserves to make an adult exchange. All without using any force or threats.
By the way that free adult exchange thingie doesn't qualify as theft.
Some parting adult advice to those delicate snowflakes - learn delayed gratification. It works wonders for preventing you from accumulating piles of unwanted crap.
And that has what to do with discrimination against Asian Americans?
Context. This is about some dumbass zipping ahead, swerving into the front and then slowing down radically. We've all seen it. When was the last time *you* saw some dumbass do that by outdistancing the truck by a friggin' football field's worth?
So no, won't do diddly.
Why should they take those things into account? Bad is bad. Not everyone deserves a ribbon in the race.
Every book of the New Testament was edited. Matthew is no exception.
Intel CPUs are not defective, they just act that way. -- Henry Spencer