I think that you are conflating and mangling multiple sources here, all of which have problems.

According to the CDC, in 2010 (latest available data) the total number of people of all ages that were UNINTENTIONALLY shot and killed was 606.

So where does your 4,000 number come from?

...or do you expect them to just know it? Math knowledge does not equal programming skill. I know that the algorithm usually picked is the Sieve of Eratosthenes, and I have no doubt that I can code it, but I first need to go to the web and find an explanation of the Sieve.

SCOTUS also ruled in United States v. Cruikshank that the First Amendment right to assembly was not intended to limit the powers of the State governments in respect to their own citizens. Reaching back to a case before SCOTUS began enforcing fundamental rights protected by the Bill of Rights doesn't really carry much weight these days.

United States v. Miller could also be read with "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia" indicating that the "arms" most protected by the Second Amendment are those which are in use by the military. After all, how can the militia get training in use of those weapons if they are not available for use?

The actual text from United States v. Miller of "The Court cannot take judicial notice that a shotgun having a barrel less than 18 inches long has today any reasonable relation to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia, and therefore cannot say that the Second Amendment guarantees to the citizen the right to keep and bear such a weapon." seems to support the position I mention above at least as well as the one you put forth.

Might want to look into that part a little more. While SCOTUS has said that there a many acceptable restrictions, DC's ban is gone, Chicago's ban has just gone and others will surely follow. Note that officials in DC and Chicago are still attempting to come up with something that will be acceptable under the standards set by the courts, but that's to be expected.

I guess they haven't lost some habits.

The Big Bang, obviously. Especially the variation where multiple Big Bangs occur.

Well, even this one claims that the change is just a "clarification" of the original intent and that those nasty pro-gun folks are perpetrating a fraud upon the people.

Very few people in the US are "armed to automatic weapons". The majority of us have semi-automatic shotguns and semi-automatic rifles, which fire one shot each time you pull the trigger -- just like revolvers, pump-action, bolt-action and other firearms with magazines. AND WE'VE GOT FUCKING GRIZZLY BEARS! (and several other nasty species)

Look again, and notice the opposition to a large standing army and the desire to keep a militia instead.