I don't recommend hiring the OP here; not only do they not realize its DMARC, but they don't seem to realize what DMARC and DKIM actually accomplish.
Luckily there are easy-to-read summaries like this one: https://support.google.com/a/a...
That blocking of ISP ranges is a real problem -- many ISPs offer business dedicated IP ranges suitable for running services like E-mail off of but are incorrectly marked as home network addresses by various idiots.
DKIM does NOT mean that a message isn't spam, it means that Yahoo really sent it.
DKIM is fixing a completely different problem; random spammers sending out E-mail from their own servers claiming to be from Yahoo (or another domain).
I've had this happen to domains I administer and its incredibly annoying, especially when clients get E-mail claiming to be from me. DKIM fixes this problem.
You obviously haven't experienced spam being sent out to people claiming to be from your domain yet -- you'll implement DKIM and SPF that week
I use DKIM and SPF on all domains I administer with appropriate settings on each and then advertise DMARC records stating that SPF and DKIM should be expected on all messages. This means anyone attempting to send E-mail as one of my clients to a server using DMARC will fail. I see no down side either.
Sounds like being atheistic suddenly means being a closed-minded bigot
That's a strange requirement. What if a pro-life person said they're against killing innocent people? Wouldn't that be good enough for a morally valid judgement?
Obviously you know nothing of the power of CLIs. No GUI file manager comes close to the power of bash, find and related tools.
Microsoft has been promising such features for years (and has even improved their own CLI for obvious reasons -- its very useful).
Its not *my* GUI, its any GUI.
The GUI rarely helps me focus on my tasks, especially with files.
Finding a bunch of files, matching them to a set of parameters and then doing operations on them is not easiest to do with a GUI. It would be wonderful if it were, but its simply not.
There really should be a national (if not international) standard for minimum amber light timings based on speed of the road in question.
Local municipalities could of course increase it for accident-prone intersections.
Those kiosks have already been available in Canada at some Tim Hortons branches for years now. At least four or five years ago I used one to order my lunch in advance at a very busy downtown branch of the coffee chain in Toronto and it printed me a receipt, my number was called and I received my order before some people waiting in line.
Compile any Linux binary as static and it will include everything it needs to run -- although 64-bit binaries won't load on a 32-bit system of course.
In fact just the other day I was on an older system and I couldn't find iperf in its distro so I downloaded the pre-compiled 32-bit binary to do some quick bandwidth testing.
As a company that deals with industrial customers, we have dealt with plenty of Windows software that will not run on anything newer than XP, or sometimes 7, or 98 or 3.1 before those.
The Windows API is not a static target.
Sounds like a pretty good idea, except that I should be able to tell it I'm travelling soon to disable that country's block.
The red light camera issue is easily Googled, many municipalities have found that the companies installing these have turned down the timing between amber and red in order to catch more people running the red.
HELP!!!! I'm being held prisoner in /usr/games/lib!
