I wonder if it's based on Numenta's Bayesian HTM (hierarchical temporal memory). My understanding of neuro-like learning system is that, unless its knowledge base is organized hierachically like a tree, it could not possibly do the things its promoters are claiming for it.
ahahaha... I see that the usual politically correct Slashdot gang is hard at work, as ususal, supressing free expression. Did I mention that you people were stupid as fuck? ahahaha... AHAHAHA... ahahaha...
'Not even wrong' does not do it justice. You're a gutless ass kisser on a mission.
You're not even wrong.
If you got any gonads, identify yourself and be on the record. Why be ashamed of what you are? A little bit of gonads is all it takes.
This is precisely this type of condescending, we-are-am-smater-than-you attitude that turns people off on science and scientists. Maybe physicists should concentrate on the foundational issues (e.g., the true nature of motion) first before they go chasing after gravity waves. You folks are not as smart as you think you are.
Did you know that over 90% of physicists believe that matter can move in spacetime even though it is known that spacetime is frozen from the infinite past to the infinite future? Did you know that physicists have no clue as to what keeps a moving particle in motion? Did you know that most physicists believe that moving bodies remain in motion for no reason at all, as if by magic?
My own research, based on the application of the principle of causality to motion, has led me to conclude that we are swimming in a enormous sea of energetic particles. Having a correct causal model of motion will unleash an age of free energy and extremely fast transportation.
note my non-anonymity
You call mujadaddy non-anonymity? Your gonads are the same size as an electron and you know it. LOL.
LOL. I get this a lot. It's better to be a kook than an ass kisser any time. Are there any people with gonads left in science? Or more to the point, are there any gonads on Slashdot?
If you got any gonads, identify yourself.
You want science to be popular? Just stop the elitist condescension and admit that you don't know it all and that you (especially, the more famous scientists) may be wrong about many things. The public has the right to mistrust scientists just as much as the religious leaders. We don't like to be preached to from on high. We want respect.
As an example, if you ask a physicist to explain why two particles in relative motion remain in motion, you come face to face with bullshit and ignorance. One may tell you that nothing is needed (the magical unseen cosmic hand) while the other may insist that physics is not about the why but the how of things. To a thinking layperson, both answers are pathetically wrong. Learn about why an analysis of the causality of motion leads to the conclusion that we are swimming in an immense sea of energetic particles.
My theory is that some Mexican or Columbian drug cartel needed a safe way to retrieve bundles of dope dropped off the coast of Florida and floating right below the surface of the water. What (who?) would be better suited for the job than Waldo? I'm sure Waldo is sporting a new black coating by now.
Submarine folks should know better than naming their craft any name other than Nemo. Serves them right. Besides, Waldo is probably a code name for a cocaine mule in that part of the country.
It just goes to show ya. If it's not one thing, it's another.
Ha ha. Old timer. Played with Fortran or COBOL lately?
Doctors should try their own medicine, IMO. I dismiss those who dismiss me. That is all.
I'm just an idea man. If my ideas are good, others will act on them and they do. There are several people working on implementing their own a COSA interpreters and associated user interfaces. Currently, I don't have the time to develop code. Besides, I am really interested in the hardware aspect of the model.
Also, it is not as if I am twisting anybody's arm to read my stuff. My motto is, love it or leave it.
The optimum committee has no members. -- Norman Augustine
