Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:And to think they'll misuse that (Score 1, Interesting) 132

Back in the late nineties I had a phone that lasted 2 weeks on a charge. I ended up buying a second charger to have at work because twice a month my phone would die in the middle of the work day. Now I charge my phone every night and that doesn't happen anymore.

I'll take the thinner phone, thanks.

Comment Re:Good design, eh? (Score 1) 152

Interestingly enough replacement battery doors were plentiful for all three of the phones. But whatever, no, I'm not making this up. I made no claims to how widespread the problem is, only that for me it traversed three brands of phones and two pricing tiers. Personally I find it hard to believe I am alone here, but I offer no proof
to the contrary.

Even if I was making this up despite a clear lack of motivation it is commonly understood that less moving parts means greater reliability.

There is no call for this philosophy to cause conflict, nor am I a liar because I don't have a fashionable complaint.

Comment Re:Good design, eh? (Score 4, Insightful) 152

When the Retina Macbook Pros came out, these were the ones with the integrated battery, one of their key differences over their predecessors is that they felt a good deal more sturdy. If you lifted it without folding it up it felt like it had a good deal more structural integrity. This is partly because it's lighter and you're moving less mass around and partly because the case is just plain more rigid.

That's why the lack of seams matters.

Slashdot Top Deals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...