Comment Re:Adding Insult to Injury (Score 1) 554
Damn, of all the days not to have mod points...
Damn, of all the days not to have mod points...
...were "Fahrenheit 451" and "Flowers for Algernon". I think those fall under your social issues category.
I can just see the kids in the UK figuring out what kind of innocent activity triggers police reactions. When the flood of false-positives starts, the cameras will be back to being as use[ful|less] as they are today.
I would think taking such a test would also be a good test of your potential new employer. If they are rigid and unreceptive to new ideas as in your examples, you probably don't want to work there anyway. If they appreciate that you solved the problem even when it wasn't necessarily the way they would do it, that says (to me) that they're probably pretty easy to get along with.
A moose once bit my sister.
You think insurance companies will lower prices for the average Joe with this? I think not. Their claim experience isn't going to change, and they need to charge X dollars to all customers combined so they make a profit. They're still going to need to charge X dollars, so what's going to happen? Heavy drivers will pay *more*, and everybody else will pay about the same as they are now. Bah!
little pieces should be easier to "digest", no?
> a barrier around the engine inflow
That's the first thing that popped into my head. Big, diamond-grate cones over the front of the engines (a flat one would probably just get crammed in there with the bird when it hit).
You beat me to it! The auditor only says your setup meets a specification. It does NOT guarantee that implementing the specification will keep you safe from all harm.
;) This ain't rocket science. You want to waterproof something little, just put it in a condom and tie the end in a knot. Whether this is cost-effective or not depends on the price difference between your current USB drive and the fancy waterproof one, and the price of condoms over the expected use period (or how good you are at untying those knots).
How else is it supposed to keep your dungeon clean?
Insightful? More like "sky is falling". Suing the source of the news would be moronic. Even if it did ever catch sombody's attention due to some text matching algorithm, the chances of it ever progressing past your reply of "we ARE the organization you're reporting on" is microscopic and doomed to failure.
The URL is present in the FA. I'm simply normalizing the comment data.
...three of which were answered "See my blog". Article rated -1 uninformative.
What about the lawyers & consultants that somehow manage to bill more than 24 hours a day?
fortune: No such file or directory