It is entirely plausible that speed limit is 70, speedometer reads 70, car is actually going 72, and radar reads 73.
It's my understanding that speedometers are not allowed to under report your speed.
The manufacturing tolerances are such that the speed can show you going faster than you are, but never slower.
OTOH I'm not sure how you can reasonably legislate pics taken from drones. Do you now define a private location to include the airspace above it? But what if I am in public airspace, yet high enough to see over a wall?
Instead of playing with theoretical situations, it's easier to focus on the basic tenets of the law:
If you can see it from a "normal" location, it's not an invasion of privacy.
If you use a R/C to look over a fence, it's like using a ladder to look over the fence.
It's not a viewpoint the average person has, therefore you're invading their privacy.
TFA talks about how they propose to "reasonably legislate"
I'd encourage you to read it.
Let's talk about a couple of the memes:
You forgot one: I definitely would NOT hit it. Just look at those sharp knees. She is way below my standar|
Fark doesn't spare anyone. Even its own privileged white males.
You just proved my point in its entirety. You think one is wrong and the other isn't. Others believe both are wrong. You even use the same language as homophobes. They think that homosexuality is not normal, healthy or acceptable.
You can't compare pedophilia and homosexuality because ONE OF THEM INVOLVES MINORS WHO ARE UNABLE TO LEGALLY CONSENT.
Sure, the age of consent is arbitrary and varies from state to state, but that's the fundamental difference.
And I don't see the slippery slope argument that leads from consenting adults to children to animals.
It's just not there.
Gays are human, too, thus they can be just as intolerant as any other human.
"Tolerate my intolerance" is a failed argument when it comes to civil rights.
It is very similar in some US states as well. Here in PA, there is a 10 MPH tolerance built into the law (reduced to 5 MPH in 65 MPH zones).
Our problem is we have a caste that calls themselves "lawmakers" and so all they want to do is make new laws.
Unsurprising, when you are ruled by lawyers. Poking around demographics on Congress, we find about 40% of members with a law degree (over 50% in the Senate). In contrast, only 2% of them are scientists or engineers...
Integer overflow has absolutely nothing to do with security
Integer overflow has been in the top five causes of CVEs for several years running. Buffer overflows, sadly, are still at the top.
Just because you get funded doesn't mean you have to do shit. Kickstarter creates as much obligation as a hobo standing outside a liquor store asking for change "for the bus".
Senator Somebody has filed "lawsuit" against your company. It is super-effective. All your assets are belong to him.
Ideally you would have a shell company that owns the vehicles and leases them to you.
It's how a lot of companies avoid liability.
If anything happens, the shell company declares bankruptcy and moves the assets to another shell.
I fucking loathe insurance companies, and deeply resent the government forcing me to pay them in order to drive.
In some states you can self insure by posting cash or a bond.
But if anything happens, you have unlimited personal liability.
Insurance isn't about you, it's about the people you might hurt.
It's a necessary evil, though I'd support an Obamacare style mandate for auto insurance companies to pay out a minimum of premiums or rebate the balance back to their customers.
Am I the only one who looks at this and thinks, "Here's clear evidence that, contrary to popular rhetoric, there is a powerful pro-female bias in this society, and any underrepresentation and underfunding that exists can therefore be entirely attributed to, I won't say failings... attributed to the character, capabilities and choices of women"?
UNIX was not designed to stop you from doing stupid things, because that would also stop you from doing clever things. -- Doug Gwyn
