Comment Re:Thrown from the vehicle (Score 1) 443
Yep that's why we buried Kimi Raikkonen in an urn last week.
OH WAIT
Yep that's why we buried Kimi Raikkonen in an urn last week.
OH WAIT
Nope, it just has to hit the ground at an angle, a piece bounces off of crash site 1 and lands somewhere else, creating "crash site 2." It even happens with cars sometimes (like today's Tesla crash story).
So you're doubling down on your accusations of lies, because your Sauron-class Morton's demon convinced you that you have very damned good reason to believe you were telling the truth. Just like you've doubled down on almost every other absurd claim you've made (an astonishingly vast collection- you're like a nonsense firehose). And like most of those other times, you reasonably should have known that. So once again, I'm not surprised that you can't recognize that your libelous accusations are baseless.
But how could you possibly not recognize that you're Lonny Eachus, a pathological liar posing as a woman on the internet?
In 2012 Jane Q. Public left a public comment at my website linking to http://things.titanez.net/dl/asshole-pseudo-scientist.png.
Googling things.titanez.net showed that it's Lonny Eachus's website.
Jane could've posted a screenshot of our conversation anonymously at a site like PostImg, but Jane's charming filename seemed like a message. So I wondered if Jane's domain name was also a deliberate message. Was it a cry for help? Part of Jane's comedy act? It couldn't be an unintentional rookie mistake, because Jane's a skilled web developer.
I don't care if I can look at it. I just want to know if it will run Watch_Dogs on ultra at 60 fps.
Provide money and guidance to the local school systems then let them buy the approved technology they need rather than what is dictated to them.
Because then all the money will go to the assistant principal's brother-in-law.
That's what oversight is supposed to be for... and if wishes were horses...
On the other hand, there's a variety of lesson plans and administrative tools used in education that can benefit from better connectivity.
Such as?
And the Bible said it was OK to stone adulterers and that you shouldn't eat shellfish or touch your wife while she's menstruating.
Read the Gospel;
Which one? The ones that the Council of Nicea approved? Or the older ones or the ones Luther approved?
See that's the problem with religion: It's made by men and yet is supposed to be above the review of men.
Basically anyone not in a bunker would become an easy target.
If you'd like to assert that falsifiability isn't required
You're the one doing the asserting that a falsifiable statement *is* required for science. I'm not required to prove a negative.
It is not and never has been a requirement for science. It's a belief of the philosopher Karl Popper, and nothing more.
Seriously, the only way this could be spoof-proof is to modulate the laser with some type of crypto.
In practice, by the time you realize that a sniper was targeting you, it is too late to start spoofing.
Which is why you should do it all the time.
Hey, maybe this is why everyone in "futuristic" movies walks around in full-body tinfoil...
It's a new feature on the smartphone app: you could already honk the horn, open the windows and roof, and many other things. Now they added "split in half and eject driver". Very useful, I must say.
Still playing catch-up with the big boys, I see.
To what "accusations" are you referring? You have kept saying that, but I have no idea what you mean. Certainly, I have criticized climate science, when I thought it deserved criticism. But where are these "accusations" that YOU are accusing ME of making? [Jane Q. Public]
Again, your accusations of fraudulent bullshit lies are baseless, and you should have reasonably known that. You made those libelous accusations as Jane Q. Public, and as Lonny Eachus. Because, once again, you're a man dishonestly posing as a woman on the internet. Is that really so difficult to understand, or are you still trying to pretend that you aren't Lonny Eachus?
Lol, you are technically correct.
The best kind of correct.
If you think the system is working, ask someone who's waiting for a prompt.
