Judge the tree by the fruit, if judge you must.

"Sincere" == willing to go to the mat for them.

Heck yeah!

If all of life is commerce, then the government feels cozy regulating your whole life.
Time to vote out these Godless Commie Sodomites and bring in some proper Americans (which idea, of course, is a philosophical concept, and has precisely 0 ethnic, religious, or sexual content, for all the liars will attempt to claim otherwise. Liars gonna lie, amIright?).

I'm saying that if the law goes where it should not (http://www.heritage.org/research/reports/2014/05/the-extent-of-americas-overcriminalization-problem) these kinds of blowback are to be expected. It's more of a problem of degree than kind. There is always going to be That Guy, of the "They's some men you just cain't reach" ilk: I get that. You'll never eliminate that smidgen. However, the other 98% of us rational, consenting adults should substantially agree on a minimal set of governing principles, and operate there.
Right now we're in this gridlock position where half the people who want the country to be an entitlement plantation are getting blowback from the other half who're no' so keen on this.

I'm willing to say that these are natural features of organizational behavior. I think that the structure of the 1787 Constitution had a lot of features to preclude our current issues, but those interlocks were over-ridden. God damn Progressivism.

Wife just had second child. We're getting all of these bills from specialists we don't recall seeing. Not cheap. Smacks of possible skullduggery.

Classic shots
Of better times
Before internet 'bots
And facial hair crimes
Burma Shave

If you're privately held, and you're having a good time, and not hurting others, why not?
If you're publicly held, you'd better have a solid revenue stream; the public worships Almighty Frogskin.

So you're saying Conscientious Objectors for military service do not exist?

Starting a business should not mean having to sacrifice your beliefs.

On a Linux desktop?