Because that is the state putting a restriction on speech which they are specifically denied the power to do.
The state is allowed to restrict free speech when it is rationally related to prohibiting what is in the state's best interests. Hate speech, potentially disruptive student speech, etc. are all totally legal to abridge and regulate. Maybe you should read the Constitution and the hundreds of cases of First Amendment case law that go along with a full understanding of the subject... or not spout pointless, melodramatic rhetoric about a subject which you clearly do not comprehend. Your pick.
This is my reaction too. I wouldn't want to hire someone who is always looking for shortcuts.
I, myself, am extremely wary of anyone who thinks their high school humanities courses covered any topic "in great detail".
If you're going to reboot a universe, do it like Doctor Who did it, and not like Star Trek.
Yeah, Star Trek was a huge, unmitigated disaster that made $385 million in gross revenue. I can see how a corporation would find the Doctor Who model much more attractive.
I'm sure an iOS App will be forthcoming to replace any lost Flash functionality.
Nnnnnnnnope.
If not they risk losing the entire block of iOS users when Apple releases its own cloud service.
By releasing the service first, Google hopes to get users set up and entrenched before Apple. This is their only hope of competing against a platform that can and definitely will remove any app submitted that directly competes with their service.
So it's going to be a non-starter for a lot of devices including of course iOS devices
Exactly.
Not a good way to dive into a market that has a lot of big players going into it including Amazon and potentially Apple who are rumored, as they always are, to be working on something similar.
You mean exactly how they entered the market with their search engine? Have you visited Altavista lately?
I got two words for you.
Permadeath, bitches.
Say "twenty-three-skiddoo" to logout.
