Lobbying doesn't immediately mean evil, you sophomoric children.
A system that runs on lobbying is by definition a corrupt system.
Can anyone name one reason why "traditional" government monopoly-licensed taxis are superior to Uber?
Anyone could, but you'd just ignore it again. Fans of Uber, nuclear power and GMO products are physiologically incapable of addressing straight criticism with a straight response.
Lobbying is how laws are changed, so it's what you do whether your goals are positive or negative.
Accounting isn't by nature negative. Accounting for Enron, cooking their books as Arthur Andersen did, is negative. So is lobbying for a parasitic company like Uber.
If you're cheering for the entrenched taxi services, you should know that taxi licenses do not protect you from any of the problems you think Uber causes.
Other than low insurance coverage and unprofessional drivers working for less than minimum wage after paying for gas and maintenance. You know, those aforementioned reasons that don't exist for Uberfans.