The word you are looking for is "covet."

Gosh, if only there was a rule against it....

Well, I mean, it's a bad thing and all, but I'm sure there are worse things. In fact, if you made a list of bad things, say 10 of them, this would probably only be number 10.

Gosh, it's a good thing that climate change studies are immune from this kind of thing! Otherwise there might be a bunch of people that are denigrating and insulting the skeptics for no reason!

LEAVE BRITTANY ALONE!

[citation needed]

What sucks even worse is that if I said:

"What sucks about this is Timothy McVeigh has got a point, but that's lost because his actions are plain nuts and will drown out most mainstream discussion."

...the leftists here would vicariously beat me like a rented mule.

Personally, I'm not a big McVeigh fan and prefer to think of him as just a murdering monster and not even worry about whether he has a point. Dropping Lee into the same category would be fine with me too.

But to want to endorse the man's beliefs and merely castigating his actions while at the same time NOT having the same reaction to someone that isn't a left wing loon is just plain hypocrisy.

Socialism is just Marxism sold by the drink.

A Holley or Edelbrock ( nee' Carter) carburetor isn't that complicated.

A Rochester is a collection of 17,358, 234 microscopic parts that atomize the fuel by bouncing around randomly inside the carb body.

The parts move so fast that they warp space-time and this is what makes the secondaries plates bigger than the primary plates.

In 1913 the top marginal tax rate was 7%. Today it's around 35%.

The "progressive" talking point of "historically low tax rates" is a flat out lie. Please stop repeating this falsehood.

kthxbai

Wait, who's the other guy? ~

That would be me. Here's a nickel, kid. Buy yourself a real operating system.