Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Can I stream to it? (Score 2) 50

Wow, on what do you base that rant?
I've been using a current Chrome-OS device (ASUS Chromebox) and it makes a great desktop and HTPC.
You can run Ubuntu in a chroot, feels like native.
Or if you want to wipe chrome-os, you can install Linux native. No hack needed, just switch to developer mode.
This is not Android.

Do you have some rational reason to believe the new device will be locked down? No developer mode?

Comment Re:And why not? (Score 1) 227

The land is not "uninhabitable", it is only covered by water, hence birds and fish really like it.

Well gee, I suppose Chernobyl is a good thing, since the animals are doing a lot better, now that the humans have mostly gone. It has become a wildlife refuge. Certainly far less affected than if the landscape had been drowned. Except for the fish.

Comment Re:And why not? (Score 1) 227

1500! Wow. It is tragic and idiotic that Germany is replacing perfectly good nuclear plants with lignite.
But while the CO2 pollution is irreversible, surely the topsoil is being saved for later rehabilitation?
The loss of land is much more temporary than for hydro. And the land is less important than river valleys. The number of people and villages displaced, as well as wildlife effects, is much lower.

Comment Re:And why not? (Score 2) 227

Difference is, the flood wont be around in a few thousand years.

Wrong. The Fukushima exclusion zone will be gone long before the dam, let alone a thousand years. Thats pure propaganda. The most active isotopes are long gone now, leaving caesium-137 with a 30-year half life.
That will affect the area for centuries, but not so much as you think.

Chernobyl even, is only "uninhabitable" by law. Hundreds live there illegally, and no-one has developed a 3rd eye or superpowers yet. Background levels are getting low (less than on a commercial flight), though hot-spots remain.

Comment Re:What Would be a Trivial Amount? (Score 1) 198

So about a dollar a month for standby. What would the author consider to be trivial?

For a prototype, thats trivial.
For specialist equipment that sells a few thousand units, its a bit sloppy, but still tiny.
For consumer equipment with 70 million units sold, it is fucking obscene.

Comment Re:what will be more interesting (Score 1) 662

Who cares if he said nigger, on or off air? There was no racist context, unlike his Mexican comments.

As a kid (not in the US), the only time I ever heard or said "nigger" was in that nursery rhyme, until reading Conrad and Twain. Just an archaic word like pickaninny.
It is kind of funny that some people now find it so taboo outside of any such context. Better not mention the Agatha Christie novel.
The joke (if you can call it that) is on the taboo word. You may have noticed that comedians like to swear?

Slashdot Top Deals

"May your future be limited only by your dreams." -- Christa McAuliffe

Working...