Comment Perl (Score 5, Interesting) 536
Perl 5 pretty much satisfies everything you're looking for. What's the problem with Perl again?
Perl 5 pretty much satisfies everything you're looking for. What's the problem with Perl again?
Thank you!
The summary makes me want to laugh and cry at the same time. So the people who wrote the law don't think there are any costs of compliance? I'm sure that's not news. That right there is a HUGE problem with government solutions.
1 in 10 deaths, huh? That's a bold statement considering the huge qualifications on it:
* 22-64 years old
* preventable
So the actual number is much less than 1 in 10, not much more as the summary says.
Not "incentivizing". "Inciting".
Neither "incent" nor "incentivize" are words. Using them makes you look illiterate.
I'll say we're tuning it out. With AdBlock we don't even receive it.
I was asking about this on the OVH forums just the other day, in fact:
Our IPMI are actually configured on a private network separated from Dedicated Servers network using a private VLAN for all the IPMI traffic fully secured via our network equipement.
There is two way you can access the IPMI connection:
1- Over a Java applet which generate and send you a
2- Over a webrowser via Serial over LAN that use a temporarly generated user valid for this session only.
We already have "incite".
And in what way would migrating to this new thing be any easier than IPv6? In either case, it's an entirely different protocol.
Exactly. Like, for example, in the title of this article.
But in the case of the title of this article, "whom" is entirely correct.
Exactly what definition excludes those people from your assertion that "everyone upgraded appropriately"?
That's not necessarily true. People may have "panic upgraded" who were using a supported and up-to-date (and not vulnerable) 0.9.8. People may have "panic upgraded" by building and installing the latest OpenSSL, not knowing that their distribution had pushed out a patched version of the version they had been running. Now, their OpenSSL might be totally outside of package management, and they could really be in trouble for this one, unless they're paying a lot of attention (which they aren't, or they wouldn't have screwed up in the first place).
I hope the percentage of criminals who get caught for bragging is high... Because if for every one of these guys in the article, there's one who can keep his mouth shut, then we may be in trouble.
A "global extinction event" is "highly probable"? And the future is wind and solar?? Talk about drinking the Kool-Aid.
Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein
