If they actually cared about what was being put into dairy cattle, they would do something about the steroids and other fun things used to massively increase production. This case is all about expanding government power and absolutely nothing to do with consumer safety.
They didn't have the science to know it was asbestos causing health problems 4400 years ago. We have the science now. We figured out that it was a bad thing. Using modern science, we would know if feeding beer waste to cattle is bad. Perhaps in a thousand years to they might have new science that shows eat steaks from beer waste fed cattle increases the likelihood of cancer by
And how many people will consider beer waste handling as an important enough issue to vote out someone? None. They're going to be more interested in big ticket items like gay rights or abortion. This is how the government stealthes in an array of regulations that eventually consume our every moment.
Yeah, this is a $20 solution...of you've already purchased a more expensive smartphone, web cam and don't mind moving your head reeeeaaaaally slowly so the lag from the screen mirroring to your phone doesn't affect you too badly.
That's not the enlightened view. Everything that goes wrong is always someone else's fault. It's the #1 Truth of progressive thinking. Poor people are poor because someone else made them poor. If socialist policies don't fix everything, it's because someone else interfered. If all the someone elses could just be burned or imprisoned or gassed or reeducated, society's problems could finally be solved and progressive paradise would be achieved.
Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked.
*affect
No. The linked article doesn't say. I did click on a link to the company's blog from the linked article and found it. Such critical information should have been both in the page that
tl;dr: This took place AFTER the public disclosure, but not by much: it seems it was April 8th.
Was this before the public disclosure, or after?
What jurisdiction do you live in that actually licenses software engineers?
So it seems that your position is so grounded in fact and science that you can skip disclosure, attack ths messenger and bypass accpuntability.
Are you related to mann or something?
(Hint: Step 2 is "defect to SK.")
Unlike the situation with Ukraine, the West might see that as an improvement. China, on the other hand, might disagree...
No, still a design flaw. This risk would not exist if they had used a more traditional design. If that church made it impossible to do so, they should have bought the church and demolished it, or built elsewhere, instead of risking lives with that less secure design!
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it." - Bert Lantz
