Comment Re:What's the name again? (Score 1) 647
I suspect every IT guy called Juan will quickly grow to hate this name...
I suspect every IT guy called Juan will quickly grow to hate this name...
I can't tell you the time I've had to waste rereading something when some author exhibits his stupidity...
Or her stupidity...
It depends on the amount of space you want to heat and how strong your roof is, but large gas bottles (200-500kg) can be bought in my neck of the woods, and there are multiple services that travel to my place to fill them. If access is an issue then multiple smaller bottles may do the trick - it all depends on how long you will be without gas.
Oh, and insulate your place. Walls, ceiling, windows, even consider the floor.
I can imagine it now - you can buy a giant dial to fit to the right hand side of the monitor to get the authentic windows watch experience. Dial 2.0 will let you fit it to the right or left side of the monitor.
Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results.
As a STEM major, I am somewhat bias towards "strong" evidence side of the argument. However, the more I read literature from other somewhat related fields i.e. psychology, economics and climate science; the more I felt that they have little opportunity in repeating experiments, similar to counterparts in traditional hard science fields. Their accepted theories are based on limited historical occurrences and consensus among the scholars. Given the situation, should we consider "consensus" as accepted scientific facts ?
Ah, right, it was on a web site a few days ago but you can't provide a link? Are you sure you didn't make it up?
Regarding Hamas bringing children to the buildings designated for destruction: you should realize that their values are different than yours and mine. We value life, they value heaven.
So you actually believe you are doing them a favour by killing their children? That's why you do it?
I've heard some low-grade racism in my time, but this takes the cake. I'd like to see you offer a source for this "Palestinians bringing children into buildings designated for destruction" that doesn't come from the IDF's propaganda division.
Unguided missiles have no military value as they cannot be aimed at military targets, that is true.
Is that true? I recall several cases where Hamas rockets have hit the IDF bases around Sderot.
But regardless of your personal motivation, why would you want to traumatize your children by having them grow up in the midst of such fear and violence?
Because there is actually very little violence directed at them, as the vast majority is directed at the Palestinians. And they want the Palestinians gone. They get upset when the Palestinians fight back, but it happens so rarely that they don't leave Israel over it.
As an Israeli and a neighbour of Gaza I tell you: pity the Gazans.
But not enough to stop bombing them....
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?