Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:It's the left version of the Tea Party (Score 0) 1799

"As opposed to those who get their "facts" from talk radio and Fox News?"

==
Yes..
Because these sources report the facts. Unlike the MSM who dont even report on some stories at all!!

September 17, 2011 | 17:09
As NewsBusters reported Friday, despite the growing scandal involving solar panel company Solyndra and President Obama being sixteen days old, the prime time programs of MSNBC have not said a single word about the matter. /snip

But hey...this is slashdot...
So dont worry your silly little mushfilled head about my post refuting your point. This will be mod'd far below sea-level so that nobody will 'exposed' to my retort.

Comment Re:What is the goal? (Score 0) 1799

"More like "I'm done paying for your BMWs, I can't even afford food anymore!".

Huh? Did you come up with that one while stinking up a public park along with your other whiners?

Let me ask you...
How does somebody 'pay for another's BMW', if they can't afford food?
Afterall, its your CHOICE to buy that iTwitPhone or other toy that was made possible by 'eveeel capitialism'.

Oh nevermind...Such a discussion would make you have to think..and besides..posing such a question always results in getting mod'd to -12.

Comment Re:Wow. (Score 1) 438

Oh..what the hell..
I know I'll be mod'd down...

But I'll cite the venona papers.

Also:
"The Venona project specifically references at least 349 pseudonyms in the United Statesâ"including citizens, immigrants, and permanent residentsâ"who cooperated in various ways with Soviet intelligence agencies, however not all were ever identified. In public hearings before the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations (PSI) conducted by McCarthy, 83 persons plead the fifth amendment right against self incrimination. An additional 9 persons refused to testify on constitutional grounds in private hearings, and their names were not made public. [27] Of the 83 persons pleading the fifth amendment, several have been identified by NSA and FBI as agents of the Soviet Union in the Venona project involved in espionage. "

Heck..even the all to over-cited wiki-thingy mentions it. (Tho they water it down a bit)

"These authors frequently cite new evidence, in the form of Venona decrypted Soviet messages, Soviet espionage data now opened to the West, and newly released transcripts of closed hearings before McCarthy's subcommittee, asserting that these have vindicated McCarthy by showing that many of his identifications of Communists were correct. These and other authors have said that Venona and the Soviet archives have revealed that the scale of Soviet espionage activity in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s was larger than many scholars suspected,[115][116] and that this too is a vindication of McCarthy.

After reviewing evidence from Venona and other sources, historian John Earl Haynes concluded that, of 159 people identified on lists used or referenced by McCarthy, evidence was substantial that nine had aided Soviet espionage efforts. He suggested that a majority of those on the lists could legitimately have been considered security risks, but that a substantial minority could not.[117]"

If you want get into the 205 vs 57 head count....no problem.

We can debate the details all day..but to completely dismiss this as 'hysterical and insane'..is well..hysterical and insane on your part.

Welp..that lil bit should be enough to have me shouted down and modded into oblivious...right?

 

Comment Re:Like all ignorant blowhards I oppose science. (Score 0) 407

Hmm..
Evidently the wackjobs at the EPA think straw/hay is evil...

http://www.naturalnews.com/033537_hay_pollutant.html

---Now that EPA has declared hay a pollutant, every farmer and rancher that stores hay, or that leaves a broken hay bale in the field, is potentially violating EPA rules and subject to an EPA enforcement action,â responded Callicrate. âoeHow far are we going to let this agency go before we stand up and do something about it?---

Comment Re:Who Knew? (Score 0) 229

Call me old fashioned..I prefer a land line...
As for TV? Nope..I cut the cord. And even after one day of no cable, I didnt miss it at all.
My entertainment comes local media, a pair of boxee boxes and xbmc. And as mentioned before, No block, no caps...so no worries there.

Comment Already have it covered... (Score 0) 168

Tho I dont like where this is technology is going...I'm not worried. I've already covered rouge TV communications nearly a year ago.
Its called a ROUTER.
My current TV has ethernet, and yes, its jacked into my local network. It has access to a local DNLA server for local media.
Being one to not allow a TV unfettered access to the net...the TV has a static IP, and any attempts to get to the net are slammed at the router. The rule is lifted only occasionally if I want to check for software updates.
So...considering this crowd, I dont think the media corps will be getting their marketing info from anybody 'round here.
No..my set doesnt have any 'net apps'. And even if it did, rules restricting connections can easily be created to connections only "I" approve of...

Comment Why the 'need' for 3 monitors? Single 52' (Score 2, Interesting) 136

Why the 'need' for 3 monitors?
On the home front I have 2 28 inch monitors. I though about going with a 3rd along with an additional graphics card. (Currently running an OC' GTX280 that is still performing well)
Then I went off and picked up an new LCD tv. The old really didnt have a home. So.....
I hooked up 'ol 52 inch Sharp Aquos to the computer.
WOW!!!
Talk about 'immersive' and 'in your face.
99% of my gaming is driving/racing sims. And a 52 inch 'in your face' was so much better than my previous testing with two 28's (center bezel notwithstanding of course)
So I've concluded that I enjoy a single 52 inch rather than multiple smaller monitors and all the headaches that go along with such a setup.
The biggest advantage of a single 52 inch? HEIGHT! You simply dont get that perspective with multiple, smaller horizontally set up monitors.

Comment Re:Story may not be right (Score -1) 387

So - corporations normally don't pay taxes, eh? People who have allowed themselves to be hoodwinked that badly are why we are IN this mess. And: let me guess... you think that giving wealthy individuals tax breaks will generate jobs, too. Man the neocons really screwed with your head, didn't they?

Thats correct sparky! Corps dont pay taxes. What they do is simply COLLECT taxes from consumer and pass it on to the g'ment.
GET IT?

Let me make this easy for you..
Suppose you own a business. (I know this is a stretch from your mothers basement..but stick with me)
You sell a product for 5 dollars. The g'ment wants to tax your, the evil corp at a higher rate.
What do you do?
You start charging 6 dollars for the same product and remit the additional revenue to the g'ment to cover your 'taxes'.
We can make it more complicated by discussing the rates vs income and how to 'account' around it..but thats the way it is.
What? You dont think this happens?
Tell ya what..let me know what you see the next time you go shopping, you'll find that the same product has gone up in price.
Its amazing mouth breathers like you are allowed out of your mom's basement.

Oops..I've shined a light on 'utopia'...mod me down

Comment Re:Story may not be right (Score 0) 387

<quote>
Q: What is the difference between the government cutting you a check for $1 and giving you a tax cut of $1?

A: Semantics
</quote>

Really?
Then obviously you assume all money belongs to the g'ment and what you have is only by the grace of the g'ment. Nevermind that you worked hard for it...right?

Only a marxist believes such tripe...

So....
Good luck with that in the face of those that believe their earnings from their own labor is their own. (Quaint idea I know..but its something I personally subscribe to).

There I go with that personal freedoms attitude again...so mod me down as usual.

Comment Re:Because they're religious nuts? (Score 0) 243

None of what you say contradicts my point, that Ahmadinejad isn't really in charge. And as much as he likes to play the violent demagogue, many analysts find that Khamenei and his advisors keep cool and don't intend to bring the country into a nuclear holocaust.

==========

Wait..let me get this straight...
"As much as he likes play violent demagogue"..."kamenei and his advisors keep cool" ...and how does letting him play 'violent demagogue' equate to 'keeping cool'?....

Think about that for a moment...
Thats like saying..."Obama..while over regulating and burdening the economy"..."is saving the economy and creating jobs"....

But hey..this is the kind of group think/ illogically muddled thinking I've come to expect when confronting others with reality...
Go figure huh?

Nice try tho..thanks for playing.

(Dont worry tho..I expect my response to be modded down into oblivion)

Comment Re:Because they're religious nuts? (Score 0) 243

If you were truly informed on the Iranian situation you'd know that Ahmadinejad, though holding the title of president, is not the supreme ruler of Iran. He must answer to other people, and he does not have control over the military. While he's probably a nutjob, he can't singlehandedly plunge Iran into a war against the wishes of others.

Huh?
Amaneedadinnerjacket answers to the mullahs..not 'the people'..
"Supreme leader" Khamenei has the final say...
It was the mullahs in 05 that handpicked em ya know...

What was that about being informed?

Oops..there I go with that silly reality thing again..
MOD ME DOWN!!!

Comment Re:Up the gas tax five dollars for passenger vehic (Score 0) 603

======= While I agree with your point in principle, the downside to higher gas taxes is that it 'fuels' (pardon the pun) the tea-party and drill-baby-drill political movements. And having those folks in power sort of negates all of the benefits of having electric cars in the first place. ========= Dare I say it? Yup...tea-partier here! (Welp..there goes everything 'round here..but before I'm modd'ed into oblivion...) We dont believe in what you 'think'. We let the market dictate. (With only the necessary g'ment oversight needed to prevent monopolistic over-reach) Having said that, we welcome the electric car overlords...when the market can bare it. (not thru subsidies, or 'nudging'.) When the tech is ready, they will come. We understand that the DELIBERATE and ARTIFICIAL raising of gas prices is just another command economy move from elites. (If you want to point to oil company subsidies, be prepared to talk about oil company taxation. You know, the part that is strangely omitted when discussing said issue). Now...'we' dont negate the benefits. We will be ready when its feasible, and doesnt require tax money to foist on the public.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...