Have you been to Detroit recently?

Does that count as post-apocalyptic?

Man and machine can now be linked more intimately than ever

Er, well this is Slashdot... but still: I'd rather not, thank-you very much.

The kernel is only responsible for initializing, suspending, resuming and lately modesetting of the hardware and it seems that is possible now.

Plus managing GPU memory allocation. But yes, this is probably something to be added to XRandR, or some other protocol extension. (What would happen to normal, non-X virtual consoles, though? This might require some more stuff in the kernel.)

Multitouch significantly increases the number of simple gestures that can be created.

Does that include Flipping the Bird?

The idea of huge, exact numbers is foreign to physicists

Not entirely, sometimes exact arithmetic is useful for quick cross-checks in theoretical physics. And sometimes expressions get churned out with very long, rational coefficients...

OK, the AC is trolling, but assuming it is being serious (it's hard to tell sometimes when it comes to libertarianism):

proprietary software could exist without government through explicit privately-enforceable contracts

What form should this "enforcement" take?

this isn't the Daily Mail comments section

GODWIN!

When did our kids becomes our enemies?

The moment they threw stuff over everybody's cars. The moment they intruded into my garden and pissed all over it. The moment they ripped an ornament from its base and deposited it in a gutter fifty metres down the road.

[Roadcraft] is available to the public, but is not specifically designed for civilian driving.

Hmm... well, despite the book's full title, there's a lot (pretty much everything, in fact) in Roadcraft that is entirely applicable civilian road-driving (especially the "non-physical" skills concerning attitude and observation). Nevertheless, as you pointed out, getting involved with the IAM (has its own book How to be an Advanced Driver, based on the Roadcraft System) and/or RoSPA RoADA (don't they tend to use Roadcraft directly?) is an excellent starting point for driving improvement.

If they were in a position to control the vehicle they could accelerate or decelerate to manoeuvre safely onto the roundabout either ahead or behind existing traffic. Of course that would also mean they have to look slightly earlier than at the last possible moment, but you can't have everything

Oh, God, heaven forbid your average driver ever make a plan...

Also have you ever been in a car with someone who does the official 'shuffle' steering all the bloody time, even when they're making a reasonably sharp turn? The combination of responsive power steering, repeated jerky movements and the fact that they are barely turning fast enough for the manoeuvre they are attempting is not confidence inspiring.

Pull-Push should be done in a smooth and progressive manner as part of controlled, planned driving. Shuffling the wheel as you described is "doin it rong". Nor is it the appropriate technique for all situations: Rotational Steering ("hand-over-hand", and there's a "proper" way to do this too) is often more convenient for slow-speed manoeuvring, or certain limited number of situations (see Roadcraft) where a lot of steering is needed very quickly (not that one should ordinarily be blasting through hazards so fast that very quick steering is needed...).

How do you left-foot brake if pressing the brake cuts the power?

I don't think it operates along the lines of "brakes applied" => "cut power regardless", there's a sequence of events required to activate the function (e.g., maybe it only cuts if the brakes are applied at or after an increase in engine power).