Uh you know that JC owns a FORD GT40, right?
Used to. He has since referred to it as the most unreliable car ever made.
No the Enigma machine was not a cryptographically sound device. It's major technical flaw was that it would never substitute a letter for itself thanks to the way its circuitry worked.
And in 30 years time, we may well be saying that PGP was 'not a cryptographically sound algorithm', 'It's major technical flaw was that it relied on not being able to factorise a 30-digit number'.
I think the GP just meant 'very strong', not 'very sound' - which for the time, it was. Its major flaw was actually its users.
I believe it was the first machine to have symmetrical encoding and decoding. Because it had a this property (as a letter was coded through the rotors, there was a rotor that reflected the encoding back through the rotor stages again), an operator could code and decode messages without reconfiguring the device. Due to the fact above, the Enigma could never encode a letter onto itself. This greatly decreased the permutations allowed and made the device less effective.
I may be misunderstanding your cause and effect combination slightly here, but the symmertical encoding/decoding did not cause Engima to never encode a letter onto itself; that was specifically because of the reflector cog at the end of the wheels and the design of the electrical circuit within the machine.
Operators would encode the rotor setup in the message.
Twice (in case there were problems in receiving the messages); this led to the British and Polish (who never get enough public credit, IMO) knowing, for example, that if the message started 'ABCDEF', then A and D were the same original letter, and likewise with B/E and C/F. Herivel should also be credited with his work in predicting the rotor setups based on relatively simply psychology
Also, the Germans would include many standard phrases like praise for the Fuhrer.
Of more use was a certain weather station that broadcast messages at a set time every day and started each with 'WETTER'.
There are many simulators of the Enigma machine (see the Wikipedia article). Very cool to play with to really understand the operation of the device.
Writing one helps you appreciate it even more. Even the rotation of each cog isn't as simple as it seems.
I wonder how long it would take them to arrest me, assuming I wasn't just shot in the back during my morning commute.
If the police arrested you simply for sending a lot of emails, the UK Government would have a lot more to worry about than whether they can get ISPs to retain sections of SMTP logs or not.
Someone already noted that GB can force you to divulge encryption keys. However, TLS generates random keys each connection, and keeps no record of them. Does that mean that TLS is illegal in GB?
No; one valid defence in the eyes of the [British, at least] law is not to know, or to have, the decryption keys for any encrypted content you may have.
It did; my first draft was slightly more scathing, but then I conceded that your original post may just have been a hastily-written reaction to a subject that you weren't completely au fait with. As others have already pointed out, the benefit is given irrespective of means.I know it must have taken a great deal of self-control
The post I followed-up started with you stepping backwards. Was your assertion behind you when you made it?but I stand by my assertion
One way to make your old car run better is to look up the price of a new model.