Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:One word: Lawsuits (Score 2) 253

Wow your videos hit a bit too close to home for me! I drive down that road in your first video all the time. I've also been considering getting a dashcam for the same reason you have one. My only concern is finding one that doesn't require a lot of fuss. I'm looking for something that auto-activates when the car is on and shuts itself off when the car is off. Ideally it'd roll over the video too, only keeping a memory of the last X hours. That way I only have to do anything with the dashcam when I actually want to permanently archive some video when something notable happens.

Comment Re:Detection is cheaper (Score 1) 686

Perhaps they don't bother because the cost of entering an arms race would be too high. If any major site were to block adblock users, you would expect the plugin to quickly route around their attempts.

If I wanted to sabotage ad blockers, I'd just host my ads from the same servers as my content, since ad blockers don't really do anything aside from block ad servers. How would you route around that?

Comment Re:Detection is cheaper (Score 1) 686

All ad blockers do is block common ad servers. They don't generally work on websites where the ads are hosted on the same server as the content because if the content and the ads are both coming from the same server then there's no reliable way to distinguish between the content you requested and the content you didn't.

Sometimes it can be done on a case by case basis by visibly blocking out regions of the page where ads normally appear, but that too can be easily thwarted by randomizing the placement of the ads.

All things considered, preventing ad blockers from working properly is far from impossible. It's trivially easy.

Comment Re:Detection is cheaper (Score 3, Interesting) 686

Yep, exactly. Preventing ad block from working is quite easy to do. Most sites don't bother because only a small minority does it and that small minority tends to be disproportionately made up of the kooky anti-consumerist crowd anyway, who aren't worth advertising to due to their hatred of advertising in general. If ad blocking ever went mainstream you'd see more sites tying content to ads explicitly.

Piracy

Submission + - A Free Internet, If You Can Keep It (techcrunch.com)

Kethinov writes: "My Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren, a prominent opponent of the infamous Stop Online Piracy Act, has introduced two bills to the U.S. House of Representatives designed to protect the free and open internet, expand the protections of the Fourth Amendment to digital communications, and protect against the introduction of any further SOPA-like bills. Since these are issues Slashdotters care deeply about, I wanted to open up the bills for discussion on Slashdot. Is my Congresswoman doing a good job? Is there room for improvement in the language of the bills? If you're as excited by her work as I am, please reach out to your representatives as well and as them to work with Rep. Lofgren. It will take a big coalition to beat the pro-RIAA/MPAA establishment politics on internet regulation."

Comment Re:Screen size (Score 0) 359

I don't know about anyone else, but I think that the size of the Nexus 4 is too big at 4.7". I was hoping for a 4" to 4.3" screen, but Google have really pushed for that extra big handset.

Glad I'm not the only one.

To me it's just silly to call a 4.7" phone the Nexus 4. They should round to the closest whole number and call it the Nexus 5 instead.

Comment Re:I should not have to pay $35 (Score 1) 442

You *still* believe pirating is stealing, even after spending time on slashdot?

(If you didn't mean to say loot, that's cool, we all make mistakes, just say so)

Tell people here that you use GPL-licensed code in a closed-source product and see how fast you'll be accused of stealing.

Pirating a song has no commercial profit motive. Violating the GPL (in most cases) does.

Android

Submission + - Why Microsoft Shouldn't Copy Apple's iOS Walled Garden (arstechnica.com)

Kethinov writes: "Will the computers of the future be tools for freedom or for censorship? An insightful Ars Technica editorial examines this question in depth, concluding that Apple's walled garden approach to iOS is fundamentally flawed and thus Microsoft should reconsider their plans to apply the same model to WinRT. The authors are careful to present a nuanced analysis that adequately weighs the competing interests of security, convenience, and user freedom, ultimately concluding that Mac OS X and Android offer better models because while their walled gardens are on by default, they offer supported mechanisms to opt-out if desired, thereby offering users the same security and convenience benefits without sacrificing user freedom in the process."

Comment Re:Interesting contradiction (Score 1) 218

When are we going to get the converse? If you don't use the service, you don't have to pay for the service?

That would defeat the whole purpose of taxation. If the people who benefit from the service could afford the service to begin with, we wouldn't need to levy a tax to fund it. Those who needed the service would just pay for directly.

Comment Re:This is a problem with consumers, not Apple. (Score 1, Insightful) 144

No, this is a problem with Apple.

You're right that Apple should be free to censor their app store however they want.

But everyone in this thread seems to be ignoring the fact that users should be free to install whatever apps they want on their device. Not permitting users the ability to sideload apps is the real censorship that we should be raging against.

Slashdot Top Deals

Arithmetic is being able to count up to twenty without taking off your shoes. -- Mickey Mouse

Working...