No we can be pretty sure that central planning doesn't work. People who keep insisting on it just prove insanity by repeating the same actions and expecting different results.
We can also be pretty sure that if people don't have a way to earn a living provide for themselves they will take it out on society.
It was a problem then as well.
I will say this IE 6 best virus delivery platform ever.
This needs to be modded hilarious.
Unless you are going to be developing a site that is directly related to an EE field (mathematics/signal analysis/electronic parts etc), why would you expect your knowledge to be any more use than say someone else's knowledge of law ? If you want topics that would be useful but aren't directly related, art/art history/graphic design/advertising all come to mind.
I know from experience my undergrad was EE and I have Professional Engineering license and it really doesn't overlap much except for problem solving skills and logical thought.
http://www.freepress.net/sites...
This image tells all you need to know about Cable/Telco promises.
Once you have a monopoly that has no competition there is no reason to improve service or product quality and every incentive to drive it down to as low a level as you can without people rioting outside your offices.
So you think hammers are trivial ?
While each DB of quieting maybe more expensive it's also more effective.
Until you get the answer you want ?
Why not, why don't we teach everyone electronics engineering ?
Why don't we teach everyone sales and marketing ?
Why don't we teach everyone the law ?
Arguably the above would all be more useful for people to know in a non professional fashion than how to code.
Complain to your utilities commission 5 years isn't enough.
But that isn't science. Here is how science works I have learned this from the warming people.
1. Make predictions that are only testable after you retire
2. Look at predictions and complain that people are destroying the world.
3. When your predictions fail, let a new generation make new predictions and tell everyone this is how science works.
3A. If someone questions your process label them a denier and call them anti science.
It would be great if we could actually get enough graphene of any sort for industrial apps
If all else fails, lower your standards.
