So if we have more job discrimination you think we can keep all our jobs
Well I certainly feel justified in discriminating against the illiterate.
Way to change that up, from lowering costs due to government regulation to promoting discrimination.
I'd say the same thing about the left and global warming, but they have moved the goal posts so it is climate change and any out of the ordinary weather event is confirming evidence.
At least in your scenario the "Preachers of Hate" would be crushed by proof, There is absolutely nothing that will get a lefty to acknowledge they were wrong.
That came from yesterdays story and actually searching for the numbers. This isn't this devices first test outing, as far as I can see he took the most discreditable data point to attack.
Really why not just sample facebook find a post that says something crazy and then extrapolate to a large group of people.
You might as well complain about the new cult that thinks mankind was created by spaghetti.
The drive may or may not work, pretty hard to mismeasure a newton + of thrust, we will see. There is no doubt it's positively insane to go all guilt by association.
Don't go bringing facts into this.
Science is pure like the love of god, Scientists are people who leave ego behind and selflessly work for the betterment of humanity
Things like studying if cocaine makes quail engage in risky sexual behavior http://blogs.scientificamerica...
Are absolutely needed for your own good, and if you doubt that you are too stupid to understand science, it's settled shut the fuck up.
True enough for the cases where you already have a job and want to keep it. The problem with excessive regulation is that it makes American workers look less desirable for new positions.
Because we can't pander to stupid people who have internalized Republican nonsense. Should we back down every time someone has a stupid belief just because Republicans cherish stupid beliefs?
On a sane site this would be modded troll and flamebait.
The supreme court was also pretty specific about the necessary conditions for a group to be a protected class. One of which is that "They are powerless[ to protect themselves via the political process"
I'm not going to look it up, but I would be surprised if the numbers of voters under 40 outnumbered those over.
still have my gx, which after 18 years of daily abuse through highschool, university, postgraduate and beyond still has not lost one iota in keypress feeling
model M? ha!
Modded and overclocked 41cx here. Really you show me another company that inspired that kind of love for it's calculators.
You really want to bring in her performance as secretary of state ?
There isn't a chance in hell of her getting the nomination. The woman doesn't have a base, but she does have an anti-base ( Voters that will go out of their way to hurt her chances). Donald Trump has a better chance of getting the nomination, and he is more a comedy act than a candidate.
How is it "immoral"?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F...
Freedom of association is the right to join or leave groups of a person's own choosing, and for the group to take collective action to pursue the interests of members.[1] It is both an individual right and a collective right, guaranteed by all modern and democratic legal systems, including the United States Bill of Rights, article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and international law, including articles 20 and 23 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and Conventions 87 and 98 of the International Labour Organization.
Activities and people everyone likes and supports require no protection.
Freedom is the right to be unlikeable and do things that not everyone supports.
"Look! There! Evil!.. pure and simple, total evil from the Eighth Dimension!" -- Buckaroo Banzai
