Comment Re:Probably intentional. (Score 2, Interesting) 543
...and that since video games are primarily played by children...
[citation needed]
you are completely wrong, by the way
...and that since video games are primarily played by children...
[citation needed]
you are completely wrong, by the way
Wow, are you assuming that anyone who criticises this game is a religious nut?
You fail at logic.
Well, I don't hear any other message from any other environmental groups, so what am I supposed to believe?
Probably because you're intellectually lazy and don't bother looking for other environmental groups or doing some basic research about environmental issues. I guess the problem is that you absorb whatever "knowledge" is placed in front of you, without regard to its legitimacy or source.
An amorphous blob consisting of people who know basic physics, physics experts, knowledge gleaned from experiments, and people who observe things beyond the confines of this planet say you're absolutely wrong about everything you discuss on that "nasty little truths" page.
No ad-hominem here. Happy now?
Also, why do you need to know who he is or what he has done in order to defend your claim? It doesn't matter whether a world-renowned physicist or a schoolchild proves you wrong, as long as the rebuttal is based on facts.
they still have the views I pointed out in my post, and are extremely loud and abrasive about them.
...
I agree with you entirely. Most environmentalists do not.
Greenpeace does not even come close to representing the views of "most environmentalists".
Like you said, they are loud and abrasive. So is the Westboro Baptist Church.
Yeah, like we are going to RTFA the farking article.
That's pretty redundant
Sounds to me like if you know so much maybe you were one of the people that helped hack this system.
You are an idiot.
"If I do not want others to quote me, I do not speak." -- Phil Wayne