This is my idea of how IP should work.
It is my opinion.
I will try not to use works like property and owner since they make it seem like it is the same as physical goods.
First it is my guess, though of course I could be wrong, that the US founders, or at least Jefferson, would agree with me.
Second, it is designed such that an artist monopolizes distribution so only he can make money.
He is not entitled to the money though.
He isn't even entitled to profit.
IP is made so he can make more art;
[b]not[/b] so he can make money.
It exists so he doesn't need another job and hence take up time he could use to make more IP.
If he isn't going to make more, for whatever reason, then a job won't take up time he could be using from making more art. He won't anyways.
After his death, for example, a job won't limit his creation time, it is zero already.
For example, MLK's speech "I Have a Dream" is copywritten.
I find it highly unlikely he would want that.
IP laws also won't originally made so works could be inherited or transferred some other way.
Third, it is intended for distribution only. It was not made to prevent you from time or space shifting; nor from backing-up.
The laws weren't even passed to disallow selling, and hence deleting, or the olde-time equivalent, your copy.
If you sell a book you lose both the paper it is made of as well as the text within.
The IP laws, of course, don't apply to the paper and binding but they do apply to the text.
Very few people, well I would hope and guess so, think that the "first-sale doctrine" shouldn't exist.
Ignoring the fact that I could have bought it from someone else instead of the copyright controller, I already gave my money to the artist. I did not prevent them from making money on it, they previously have, though perhaps indirectly though others.
Fourth, I don't think the phrase "intellectual property" should be used. It implies that it is like real property and can be stolen the same way.
Plus the abbreviation is IP which is the same as "internet protocol" and confusing.
I don't know what a good name should be but IP doesn't seem right.
Disclaimer, I do not own any significant IP.
I did make a Tetris program a decade ago but if anyone obtains a copy, such as from my home website, they can do whatever they choose; including de-freewaring it, if the law allows.
Any other stuff I made isn't really completed but the same applies.
P.S. Ironically ,the bottom of /. says, "Comments are owned by the Poster."
Many other sites have similar rules.
I have copied various bits of them for interestingness or humor. I wonder if I could be sued.
I should post them sometimes.
One of my favorites is "It's like a kitten with a tuba, it makes no sense," referring to a useless unique unit in Civ4.
I'm hoping that one catches on.
Everyone who sees this, try to use it yourself and get others to do the same.
If I get good comments I might even try to get it published to the from page of Slashdot.