My comment is moderated redundant?

Maybe it is just me showing my age.
Back in the day, in order to be redundant, you needed to repeat, or re-iterate, in some way, something that some other person had already said.
Since no previous comment had been made on this topic, I am at a total loss trying to understand how my comment can be 'redundant'.

Sigh... I will never get used to modern times where you can be redundant before you speak.

Mod parent up. Ballistic and Cruise are two different animals.

The whole point of a 'Cruise Missile', is that it maneuvers... i.e it is not 'Ballistic'

I believe there were at least 14 models of Cruise Missiles before this that were SuperSonic.

Mod me 'redundant' again, and again...

So my question is 'Redundant'?

How can it be redundant... there is no prior discussion?

Oh, sorry about that... but what is your point?

Seems to me that cruise missiles have been around for a while, and one of the defining properties is that it 'steers'

And Only?

The first?

Damn! I had an aunt with earrings like that! All this time I thought she was just weird... I never suspected she was a Geek girl!

Isn't local storage part of HTML 5?

Why does any company 're-brand' itself?
What was wrong with the old brand?
Finally, does a change in name equate to a change in fact?
Just asking.

The originating TTL of a packet is decided by the application that created it.
Since there is no mandatory original TTL, there is little use in filtering by TTL.

If some ISP decided to start filtering packets based on a low TTL, all application vendors would respond with updates that originated all packets at the maximum TTL.

Except for a few research networks, all V6 traffic runs through the same 'tubes' as V4.
So all else being equal, V6 data rates should be no different than V4.

But all is not equal.

V6 has several refinements over V4, which tend to enhance throughput.

Which begs the question... how many single stack systems are left out there? Is this really an issue?

All current desktop operating systems are dual stack capable.

Most current 'big iron' routers, switches & etc are dual stack capable.

Lower level stuff like dumb switches don't give a damn.

That pretty much leaves the consumer grade DSL and Cable gateway.
Newer ones are dual stack, but most aren't.
However, given the crappy quality of these devices, they will all be doorstops within a couple of years... and replaced with dual stack gateways ( of similar crappy quality).

So should we really be worried about leaving anyone behind?

Uh, Read RFC 1.

December 1969.

I'll agree that Napster immensely popularized the use of P2P tech... but it wasn't the first, not by a long shot.