Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:Well that's a start... (Score 1) 163

I'd love to see an expert system that could take in some form of legal jargon, the details of a specific situation, and spit out an unambiguous application. Of course, then it could lead to all sorts of "hacking" the system. Imagine winning a court case because of an off-by-one error in a law, or a buffer overrun vulnerability in a contract that allowed for arbitrary code execution.

Comment Re:Silly (Score 1) 764

And I wouldn't be surprised to hear someone say they were "proud" to be 5'2" or 6'6". Nobody gets mocked for being 5'10" (at least in a predominantly Caucasian crowd - when I'm the only white guy in a crowd of Pilipino people, I get the occasional comment)

Comment Re:Exact mathematical value isn't the ideal (Score 2) 239

If you are doing any floating point calculations and assuming exact results, you're going to get yourself in trouble. The issue is that FSIN is less accurate than advertised, not that it's not 100% accurate.

Anyone who deals with floating point math very quickly learns about error accumulation and how to deal with it.

Comment Re:Costs (Score 4, Funny) 315

We'd obviously have to situate it off-world and use some sort of electromagnetic beam to send the generated energy to earth. Heck, given the amount of extra power generated, we could just send off the energy everywhere and there'd still be enough hitting the earth. We could then use devices here to convert that energy into electricity.

Comment Re:Catching up with Fedora (Score 2) 644

Yes, you can. Except instead of getting back text, which you then have to parse if you want to do anything with, you get back a stream of .NET objects which will be formatted into a text table if you do nothing with them, but also let you do things like this:

ls | where { $_.Length -gt 5000 }

Comment Re:Sexual selection by the opposite sex. (Score 3, Informative) 190

The explanation I've heard for useless showy features (a la peacock) is that the ability to put resources into giant shiny feathers show that you have the ability to gather enough food to live, and have leftover energy to devote to impressing the ladies. It's not so much the particulars of what the feature is, but rather having resources (or money) to burn indicates that you're successful enough to be a good mate.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.

Working...