Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment What a joke (Score 1) 1719

Gun control? Like they control illegal drugs? Like they control felons getting illegal guns? Please. All they will do is harass people who never do anything wrong. The criminals and wackos will get guns and still do their thing.

Its pretty simple. They either follow the rules and change the US Constitution to remove the 2nd Amendment or go home, because the US Supreme Court keeps over turning gun bans.

Comment Ruin your eyes.... (Score 1) 661

Human eyes either can't see that many pixels crammed onto such a tiny screen, or will eventually ruin their eyesight trying. A smart vendor avoids the inevitable lawsuits.

I used a 1920x1200 15" laptop for a while, and found it unusable long term, especially with Windows. X-windows was doable. Apple has a long history of deciding what the ergonomically correct resolution is for a display size and sticking with it. 13" was 640x480. 16" was 832x624, etc. All of Apple's CRT monitors were fixed resolution with the same display DPI. Even retina displays are only used to make the ergonomic resolution "look better".

Comment Love books... (Score 1) 700

Samson Agonsistes - John Milton
Coriolanus - William Shakespeare
1984, Animal Farm - George Orwell
Philosophy of History - Hegel
18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte - Marx
For Whom the Bell Tolls - Hemingway
Dead Souls - Nikolai Gogol
The Master and Margarita - Mikhail Bulgakov
My First Goose - Isaac Babel
Lives - Plutarch
Origins of Rome - Polybius
The Alternative in Eastern Europe - Rudolf Bahro
Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72 - Hunter Thompson
Requiem for a Dream - Hubert Selby
The Book of Tea - Kakuzo Ukahura
Never Let Me Go - Kazuo Ishiguro
The Economic Consequences of the Peace - JM Keyenes
Eminent Victorians - Lytton Strachey
On the Road - Jack Kerouac

Many too many to list

Comment Did the US actualy win? (Score 1) 429

Has the US actually WON either in Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan? I would think the effectiveness of drones is kind of "iffy" if the US is not strategically winning.

If I recall correctly the use of drones caused Pakistan to cut the US supply lines to Afghanistan (and probably much much worse); that is a major strategic failure in return for the targeted killing of a few hundred alleged terrorists and the civilians in their immediate surroundings. Drones in Yemen basically cause the allied government control of the country. After 10 years, a frigging decade, the most sophisticated, well equipped and trained army in the world can't master 10,000 illiterate tribesmen with 40 year old (or older) small arms, and will probably let the country go back the Taliban.

Comment What a waste of money (Score 1) 183

This is America...the police can walk right up and talk to you, question your friends, hire informants, or simply park outside your house and watch for a lot less money than a single drone flight. Its not like these guys are trying to carry out surveillance in a war zone where hostile people can open fire with automatic weapons at any moment. There are no roadside bombs.

Start militarizing the police and turning the nation into Stalinist USSR and that might change very fast.

Comment Porn has ruined sex (Score 1) 1034

People used to develop their sexual identity in isolation. A person's sexual tastes, fetishes, kinks, and behavior was almost entirely unique. Every one was slightly different. Now they are all the same, as they all see the same thing during their developmental years.

Combine that with a society that infantilizes young adults, and you get a terrible, vapid, boring mix.

Comment Do web ads even work? (Score 1) 215

I think the entire market is a sham. The smart users block every ad, tracking cookie and other marketing tool they possibly can, and I think everyone else mentally blocks they ads that do get placed on pages. I can't recall a SINGLE WEB AD, although I periodically scan my spam box for funny phishing emails or Nigerian scams.

Facebook is worth about $12 a share based on FUTURE potential. That is about it. But that is combined with the inherent risk of a product that could literally implode over night like MySpace or AOL.

Comment And the point is? (Score 1) 264

Large numbers of herbivores, are consistent across the fossil record. As are billions of plant eating insects and zillions of methane producing bacteria. Therefore the methane product should be relatively consistent, and constant element in the climate. Since the climate swings between a relatively defined temperature band, the methane is obviously accounted for in the system making this a non-story.

What the article says is that they assumed dinosaurs produced methane. They assumed the amount of methane. They assumed the climate behaves exactly as it would today. They assumed that their models are correct.

Comment Facebook is for chump investors.... (Score 1) 192

Facebook has already reached maximum growth, and future efforts to monetize the service will only alienate users. This IPO is simply a huge cash payoff to the private investors, the owner and friends of the owner, because Facebook is no longer a "growth" company. The risk is also high. Look at how fast AOL, then MySpace collapsed...it will not take much for Facebook to do the same.

Unless I had access to privileged pre-IPO shares that could be flipped in a few days as the suckers pile in, I'd not touch this IPO.

Comment Yet another government failure.... (Score 1) 556

Ethanol is just the latest in a long line of failed "policies".

In my lifetime, the US, the most powerful & advanced military in the world, has never won a war! Over 20 years I've watched the US government destroy the space program, destroy the housing market, and destroy the public education system. Even the most solar friendly administration in history managed to destroy the US solar market in less than three years. Simply amazing. Granted, European leaders are working just as hard to screw up everything they touch as well, lol.

Comment Most science is wrong, as it should be. (Score 1) 962

Most scientific hypotheses fail. So most scientists are usually WRONG. That is not a bad thing. Proving something does not work is knowledge too. But these days scientists appear more like game show hosts. They will say anything knowing hardly anyone will dispute it, and scientific refutation does not usually get reports. Political correctness takes precedent over the scientific method.

This leads to stories worthy of Monty Python. The most recent I have seen was a scientist who died of plague. He was working with a genetically modified version of plague that should have been non-infectious. So they implemented no bio-hazard controls. Since they really had no clue what they were doing, they actually created a version of plague optimized for the genetic condition common to descendants of plague survivors. The scientist died, and a bio-hazard incident on the campus. Talk about Darwin Awards.

In shot take all pronouncements Deus ex Scientifica with a large grain of sand, and wait a few years for the actual physical proof.

Slashdot Top Deals

He has not acquired a fortune; the fortune has acquired him. -- Bion

Working...