(note: the "Title track" leads off side 2 rather than 1, which is interesting, but it works).

This happens on many albums. Some time ago I read the reason for that, but I forgot what it was. It's not only on vinyl; even on CD the title track is often around track 6-7.

That's exactly what they did. Sadly unsurprisingly the summary got it wrong. See this picture:
http://creativetime.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Disc_001.jpg

All of that is irrelevant, he was asked by the judge to list all previous cases he'd been involved in and he didn't mention this specific one.

Citation please. Can you show exactly where the judge asks that?

As I said, millimeters is exactly the same as liters per square meter.

Still it's not as bad as measuring rainfall in liters per square meter like we do here in Spain.

I'm wondering, what exactly is the problem with that unit? Which alternative would you prefer?

Because if it's mm that you prefer, you're maybe interested to know that liter per square meter is exactly the same as mm:

liter / m^2 = dm^3 / m^2 = (10^-1 m)^3 / m^2 = 10^-3 m^3 / m^2 = 10^-3 m = mm

But imagine what happens if this explosion happens while driving at highway speeds.

Same here. In hearing tests everything is ok, I can still hear relatively high frequencies. But in a loud environment, it is *very* difficult for me to understand what people are saying, and it's also difficult for me to speak myself -- because I can't hear what I'm saying, I guess.

Even in a moderately noisy environment (think busy cafeteria with the background noise of everybody talking and maybe some music playing) it is difficult and tiring, but still doable, to participate in conversations.

The actual provider of the content is not the link. It's what's at the other end of the link, which in these cases is the person claiming to be wronged.

That's incorrect actually. I read the verdict (I speak Dutch), and what happened is that the photos leaked and were uploaded by some unknown person to FileFactory.com and later to other filesharing sites. GeenStijl.nl posted an article saying "hey, Britt Dekker's nude photos are leaked, you can see them OVER THERE".

I don't know how GeenStijl.nl came to know the URL. Got a tip from the person who leaked the photos, I guess.

As someone here said: the case is more nuanced than would appear from the summary, but I don't really know what to think of it.

If that's true, they shouldn't just ban electronic devices but also books, sudoku puzzles, newspapers, magazines, rubikubes, .... And they should have done that even before the proliferance of electronic devices.

But they didn't, and they don't. So that "real" reason can not be a valid reason.

64-bit version of Win7 here, with Firefox 14.01. Scrolls smoothly.

Unfortunately, the answer is yes.

Heineken in bars in Belgium, let alone Heineken-only bars? Where was that?
In Belgium, bars serve beer. That means no Heineken.

Citation please?

Fun fact: wikipedia's side bar provides convenient links to the same article in English (and several other languages).

I think your sig is missing 1101 at the end.