Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×

Comment Re:IMHO solaris has a really bad userland (Score 1) 378

I've bashed Vista and agree with almost everything I've read about it for the single reason; I've experienced all that myself.

I wasn't an early adopter -- my first experience was with my laptop, which I bought before SP1. Horrible startup times, and even though I've taken out all the desktop effects and updated everything it still simply sucks.

Kubuntu on the otherhand simply worked immediatedly after I installed it, much snappier and no IO problems (Vista SP2 still hangs when copying files). With the 9.04 I finally got very fast desktop effects that still enable the desktop to be faster than Vistas (without any effects).

Now days even ACPI sleep/hibernate work well in both operating systems.

I only keep Vista around to enable myself HP's bios/firmware upgrades; there's not even a remote possibility of being able to work with Eclipse in Vista -- not that it's fun in Kubuntu, but the times I need it, it'll do.

To get back to replying to you; Vista hasn't done any progress compared to Kubuntu. Perhaps Windows 7 finally fixes everything (copying files etc.) but I still think I should be getting it for free as an SP it really is; don't really care for the UI or DirectX side. I'm glad I only paid "the microsoft tax" with my laptop, imagine what the people who actually bought a license must feel..

Comment Can't you learn anything from the Scandinavia? (Score 2, Interesting) 510

Go and demand your gsm subscriptions and your mobiles separately.

Easy as that. Unless you are already past the point when there are only these mega corporations (Verizon + AT&T) selling you what ever bigger companies want.

Buy Nokia :) (The cheapest ones, you don't get angry when destroy the damn thing next friday when you're drunk! You don't really need all those fancy features, you just want to make a call, send an sms and every phone can run Opera Mini)

Comment Real impact is close to zero (Score 1) 534

UAVs are to detect hostiles, observe movements (spying if you will) and perhaps engage them. You can't really use the UAV information to kill the ones benefiting from it -- unless someone is stupid enough to observe/admire their own camp from an UAV, which at wartime sounds pretty stupid. As an opposing force member you could see yourself in it's video feed, or gain information that you are not. That information can however be gained other ways too; for example:

  • If the other side knows about you, and have assessed you as a significant threat, they will take action. Nevertheless, you must be prepared to be taken action upon; it's not like any trained militia is going to party high until they are certain they are going to get hit, they'll always keep high alertness. With the modern UAV's carrying air-to-ground missiles you really can't move your terrorist training camp out of the way before UAV operator gets permission to blow you up, even if you knew that they had just learned about you -- there just is not enough time.
  • If the other side doesn't know about you, they can't take any straight action against you. Simple as that.

Information sent by this UAV becomes a problem if it's decode able by the opposing forces while it's landing to or taking off from the airforce base. Then again, there cannot be too much to learn from there. As an opposing force member you most likely already have information (googled up perhaps) about their airforce base, the kind of security they have behind their lines. If someone was decoding your UAV transmissions to learn about your airbase, you'll most likely been already compromised as they ought to be in the visual range as well.

Of course this is mostly from army point of view, intelligence gathering can't be stupid enough transmitting anything unencrypted/unobfuscated.

Comment Re:The real mystery (Score 2, Insightful) 232

I do not think that the problem lies in use of C/C++, but in the horrible way of using it. From what I've gathered around the Internet "why win32 is great" is that they lacked any kind of stable way of creating their (old?) APIs; everyone just created a new standard for return values and parameter handling. And on top of that some crazy macros that make Symbian code look readable in comparison.

I mean, I've only learned how to program in C/C++ (at university) but been working as a Java dev for quite some time now. Still I can almost make sense of mplayer's or ffmpeg's source code but every time I see some "Windows" C++ it's just plain awful because of all the macros and #define constants. If you ever read KDE's or Qt's sources and compare those to something done with win32... There is a massive difference.

Every tool can be miserably misused.

Comment Re:My statement on "fair use" & p2p file shari (Score 1) 393

4. Effect upon economic exploitation of the work - would seem to go against file-sharers. Obviously they aren't buying it! And by sharing it, they may be hurting the owner's ability to sell it, etc.

IANAL but didn't every *AA just have a record year (again), despite of the general downturn? They can blame it on "movies inspiring people when they are poor" but I'm not buying that.

At least my consuming habits have gone up since P2P; I buy the tv-series I watch (if or when they ever are released where I live) and buy the movies I enjoyed watching. Actually I just bought a book too, on which a movie was based.

Comment Re:Like Windows users are gonna care (Score 1) 262

For every new PC (w/ Vista) we buy I instruct their new owners to start getting used to OpenOffice and if necessary, use the Office trial they bundle with it again, only if necessary.

So far I've had 100% (2/2 yei!) success with converting co-workers from Office to OpenOffice. Perhaps the transition from XP to Vista helps with Office to OpenOffice at the same time.. At least the new ribbon interface is so strange to some people that it seems to scare people off.

Small print: these guys were not programmers or writers and only do simple tasks; they most likely had never even (nor will learn in the future) learned how to use styles with word processor.

Comment Re:It's all child pornography. (Score 1) 437

But... since I'm an American.... I would rather let the people go to these sites, determine who is getting their jollies off looking at this stuff, and then let's round up all these sick f--- people and kill them.

That thought has occurred to me as well. Why block these sites when you could presumably get warrants to see who is going to them and actually investigate the people breaking the law instead of trying to impose a censorship scheme that will never work anyway?

Two greatest ideas of the century.

I wonder why not instead blocking these sites officials would attempt to co-operate internationally to hunt down the child abusers?

Sounds like there could be higher chance of random "normal" (as in not-interested-in-children-in-that-way) person seeing some child porn while hunting for his/her kind of free porn from the Internet compared to the chance of someone "just happening to produce child porn and putting it up on the Internet."

In your model the "random normal person" would be thrown to the jail, child abusers getting thanked by the police for giving them yet another sick person stumbling on their site.

What all this boils down to is the politicians thinking that closing their eyes makes the problem go away. The Police officials must know that is not the right way; but they do not have a choice.

Comment Re:SSDs = productivity (Score 1) 480

What if you just bought 8GB ram, or is 64-bit system out of question?

Having worked with eclipse for the past year with mid-level pc (some core2 duo with 32-bit linux, 2GB ram, basic SATA hd) I've been thinking that maximizing the available ram would have the same benefits than SSD in the best scenario (regarding the performance penalty reported in ./ not long ago) and possibly be even a better choice in the long run...

Comment Re:A Strawman for the Symptom (Score 5, Insightful) 723

I do not think TPB is about theft.. Or at least that's not what made it so popular, here's the real deal:

  1. People, in this case, young people who know how to use the Internet got a thought they want to watch the same movies/tv-shows premiering in the USA allaround the world
  2. People search for a legal alternative, which in this case was and still is: wait. There's a chance you can in next N months:
    • Go watch the movie in theaters, if movie is a blockbuster (N < 12)
    • Go rent the movie, if movie is a blockbuster (Ntheater + [1, 6])
    • Hope that your local TV-channel airs the show (N > 12)
    • Hope that you can one day buy the show on your region DVD (N > 18), region 1 (N > 24)*

With this new cool Internet, where news about everything travels at lightspeed, and stuff gets old faster than yesterdays newspaper, people want to see their films now, not in 12 months.

* It's not legal to watch Region 1 DVD's where I live, as I live in Europe. Alas, not even watching DVD's under linux is legal here anymore.

I at least, have contacted for example Fox, on how to view some of their series legally from here, but they didn't even bother. That sends a clear message to me that it's ok to download 24 from bittorrent, hell they do not even want my money, I doubt they are going to sue me if they do not want to make a deal in the first place.

Comment Re:And the *real* useful bandwidth will be? (Score 1) 386

I doubt that it will much of an issue. Having anywhere between 10-100Mbps (up&down) up to what ever and making it really work at that level like a charm will open up a lot of potential to people spreading up around the country and creating jobs as they slowly spread..

I'd work from home, and even better I'd like to move over to a bit more rural area only if I could get a 10Mbit line up there.

Comment Really sad.. (Score 2, Interesting) 284

For years I've felt bad for, well for example Americans for corporations having way too much power over there. Now even at my very own home country, the employer of my many friends of mine pulls shit like this, it's unbelievable.

For what? To spy their employees? What the fuck?!

Does Nokia even have the slightest competitive edge on innovation at any frontier? No it does not. In the past few years they've only managed to start copying others.. So I guess they are afraid their employees sending emails telling everyone that they are now starting to copy Apple or RIM or whoever employs innovative people. That's like sending answers to simple math questions like 1+1=2.

The law itself, so called "Lex Nokia" is bad, it's really bad. Any organization can, after it's passed start surveillance on their employees after filing some stupid form. Police won't have any control over these operations. You aren't even required to fill the god damn form, you can do it later on and pay a small fine!

Can you spell out obscene in some other way? This is ridiculous. I do not want to live here anymore if Nokia gets it's way. To hell with them, Finland would be a much better place without them. Poor, maybe a bit shaken but it surely isn't worth of losing every last sense of law in this country.

Just if someone would make sure to collect them every cent of development grants they've received in the past years before they go.

Comment Re:Windows 7... Is it really that much better? (Score 1) 856

If the upgrade costs more than 1 EUR I can't see myself upgrading, at least legally. Even that 1 EUR would be total ripoff as everyone has pointed out, Windows 7 is Vista the way it should had been, more correctly it's SP3.

Currently I only need Vista to apply HP BIOS upgrade every two years. (I haven't dared to try out that FreeDOS disk of their after it once corrupted one HP's BIOS).

Slashdot Top Deals

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...